Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Maybe the reason there’s no intelligent alien life, is because just like here, hypergamy went wild

coping_manlet

coping_manlet

Admiral
★★★★
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Posts
2,823
Eventually women’s standards get so high they refuse to breed with anything other than a man with hyper masculine features so exaggerated that it would be genetically impossible to produce naturally. Or women will just disregard men as a whole entirely (kind of like that one Rick and morty episode with the woman planet, except women aren’t smart enough to enslave men and leave earth).

This will make it impassible for our species or any other to reproduce at a rate necessary to sustain a working population large enough to produce and operate interstellar vehicles at large
Basically women might be responsible for the Fermi paradox in
 
Your name say it all
 
That's illogical. Hypergamy exists because it's a more successful reproductive strategy than not being hypergomous.
 
That's illogical. Hypergamy exists because it's a more successful reproductive strategy than not being hypergomous.
Women don’t know how to make spaceships :feelsthink:
 
women don't want men, even gigachad but their naturally drawn to him
 
That's illogical. Hypergamy exists because it's a more successful reproductive strategy than not being hypergomous.
lolwut? Hypergamy exists because it's successful? Its own existence justifies its existence? That's a short bus level logical fallacy right there. You can use that excuse for anything. Incels, manlets, autists, Down syndrome babies...they all exist. Does the mere fact of their existence "prove" that their existence is "good" or "justified"?

Hypergamy is like strip mining. It feels good for the foid or the corporation that's doing it, but it's unsustainable. The hypergamous, feminist gynocracy we live in is temporary. Foids, especially feminist ones, always brag about how "caring" they are and how "supportive" they are of other women, but their great-granddaughters will most likely go back to being chattel once the gynocracy collapses thanks to foids' unsustainable hypergamy and the pendulum shifts. But females are "le empathetique genderino" JFL.
 
lolwut? Hypergamy exists because it's successful? Its own existence justifies its existence? That's a short bus level logical fallacy right there. You can use that excuse for anything. Incels, manlets, autists, Down syndrome babies...they all exist. Does the mere fact of their existence "prove" that their existence is "good" or "justified"?

Hypergamy is like strip mining. It feels good for the foid or the corporation that's doing it, but it's unsustainable. The hypergamous, feminist gynocracy we live in is temporary. Foids, especially feminist ones, always brag about how "caring" they are and how "supportive" they are of other women, but their great-granddaughters will most likely go back to being chattel once the gynocracy collapses thanks to foids' unsustainable hypergamy and the pendulum shifts. But females are "le empathetique genderino" JFL.
Exists as in, has survived over time, not literally "physically exists in this universe".
It's successful by virtue of surviving natural selection. Breeding with strong males produces strong offspring. Weak males = weak offspring.
If hypergamy wasn't a good breeding strategy then people with hypergamous traits would have died out and their traits along with them.
it's unsustainable
It's been sustainable so far for billions of years in every species.
 
Exists as in, has survived over time, not literally "physically exists in this universe".
It's successful by virtue of surviving natural selection. Breeding with strong males produces strong offspring. Weak males = weak offspring.
If hypergamy wasn't a good breeding strategy then people with hypergamous traits would have died out and their traits along with them.

It's been sustainable so far for billions of years in every species.
You're a delusional fucking retard. Every species? Chadworship is solely a (retard) human thing, do you really think that "chad" bacteria exist? Just unironically kill yourself already.

And what about shitty FEMALE genes? Who's getting rid of them? They keep breeding generation after generation and creating more incels.

You're probably a libtard cuck from cucktears who's trolling with "muh just world" crap. Fuck off and die of cancer, you basement-dwelling loser. RIGHT WING INCEL POWER FOREVER
 
Chadworship is solely a (retard) human thing
No, it demonstrably isn't. The simplest example is any animal with a harem - monkeys or lions. Only a minority of males get the opportunity to reproduce.
It's not a solely human thing because the reason isn't solely human.
A male can have a potentially unlimited amount of offspring since a male can reproduce several times a day - that's why males aren't picky about who they reproduce with. It doesn't cost anything to fuck a weak female.
A female can only have a small number of offspring in her lifetime - that's why she has to be picky about who she reproduces with. If a female reproduces with a weak male, she will likely have weak offspring that is unlikely to survive. And during the entire gestation period the female can't reproduce.
This is basic very very obvious darwinism.
 
That's illogical. Hypergamy exists because it's a more successful reproductive strategy than not being hypergomous.
Take away the ((())) and see what happens to the """"strategy""""
 
No, it demonstrably isn't. The simplest example is any animal with a harem - monkeys or lions. Only a minority of males get the opportunity to reproduce.
It's not a solely human thing because the reason isn't solely human.
A male can have a potentially unlimited amount of offspring since a male can reproduce several times a day - that's why males aren't picky about who they reproduce with. It doesn't cost anything to fuck a weak female.
A female can only have a small number of offspring in her lifetime - that's why she has to be picky about who she reproduces with. If a female reproduces with a weak male, she will likely have weak offspring that is unlikely to survive. And during the entire gestation period the female can't reproduce.
This is basic very very obvious darwinism.
Once again, kinda cherry picking with the lions. Also only roughly 1 in 8 male lions survive to adulthood, opposed to 50% of females due to their high aggression.

Chimps on the other hand actually aren’t hypergamous at all. In fact they’re the opposite of humans with monogamy. They just sleep with whoever constantly, extremely promiscuous with no standards.
 
Chimps on the other hand actually aren’t hypergamous at all.
From wiki:
A community's dominant males sometimes restrict reproductive access to females. A male and female can form a consortship and mate outside their community. In addition, females sometimes leave their community and mate with males from neighboring communities. These alternative mating strategies give females more mating opportunities without losing the support of the males in their community.
And here's another one.
[...] low-ranking males sired more offspring than predicted. Low-ranking males sired offspring with younger, less desirable females and by engaging in consortships more often than high-ranking fathers.
While our work confirms that male rank typically predicts male chimpanzee reproductive success, other factors are also important; mate choice and alternative male strategies can give low-ranking males access to females more often than would be predicted by the model.
Like human betas, chimp betas also use "alternative strategies". Isn't nature beautiful.
 
No interstellar species with rampant degeneracy can physically exist. If a species is smart and powerful enough to conquer the stars, you can rightfully assume they aren't complete idiots.
 
Exists as in, has survived over time, not literally "physically exists in this universe".
It's successful by virtue of surviving natural selection. Breeding with strong males produces strong offspring. Weak males = weak offspring.
If hypergamy wasn't a good breeding strategy then people with hypergamous traits would have died out and their traits along with them.
Jfl @ you insisting every Chad Foids fuck is a genetic adonis because they’ve got “face gud”. The men women choose to fuck is not based off of nature it’s based off of carnal lust, and having a good face doesn’t mean the rest of their genes are gonna make up for their faults.
Exists as in, has survived over time, not literally "physically exists in this universe".
It's successful by virtue of surviving natural selection. Breeding with strong males produces strong offspring. Weak males = weak offspring.
If hypergamy wasn't a good breeding strategy then people with hypergamous traits would have died out and their traits along with them.
Hyper gamy is a shit breeding strategy. They choose men that they are only attracted to because of their face. There’s tons of gymcels who have amazing genes but can’t breed because Stacy wants to fuck skater Chad.
Women have an awful way of choosing mates because they inevitably end up settling with the desperate guy they neglected for years when they should of talked to him in the first place instead of fucking around with unstable sociopaths
You give women way too much credit
 
Last edited:
I think the big oil and gas industries are far more responsible for the so called Fermi Paradox than anything else. :feelsohh:
 
not based off of nature it’s based off of carnal lust
"Carnal lust" is "nature". You don't get to pick what you find attractive. What you're attracted to is a trait that's been passed down to you by your ancestors.
Why do you think males find young women more attractive than old ones? Because they're more fertile and mating with them yields more success. Any male line that finds older less fertile women more attractive than young ones is bound to go extinct.
having a good face doesn’t mean the rest of their genes are gonna make up for their faults
What we subjectively think is a "good" trait doesn't matter. If a "good" trait can't survive natural selection - it's not good. Nature will sieve out the unsuccessful genes and there's no arguing with it.
 
What we subjectively think is a "good" trait doesn't matter. If a "good" trait can't survive natural selection - it's not good. Nature will sieve out the unsuccessful genes and there's no arguing with it.
You don’t understand though, it’s not true natural selection. The environment we live in is artificial and has many safety nets preventing nature from taking control. If we grew up similar to animals then hypergamy would have 0 room because men who were smart or had more character to them than “face gud” would be busy hunting and smashing peoples faces in
 
From wiki:

And here's another one.


Like human betas, chimp betas also use "alternative strategies". Isn't nature beautiful.
Congrats on doing some deep research on chimps. Once again, chimps are also our closest relatives and are highly intelligent. Your point doesn’t still stand,

it seems life in this universe, when it reaches an intelligent level, reproduction will lean towards hypergamy. Which in the long run is favorable to one gender only and dissallows species to work undivided towards conquering the cosmos. And instead keeps them focused on uh, well posting twerking videos on Tik Tok and making fun of incels apparently while the other half of the species rots
 
If we grew up similar to animals then hypergamy would have 0 room because men who were smart or had more character to them than “face gud” would be busy hunting and smashing peoples faces in
What do you mean? In those ancient times hypergamy was far more rampant than now. Less than half of human males got to reproduce. The alphas siring countless offspring.
"Face gud" isn't the only factor, obviously. Hypergamy doesn't mean "mate only with the most attractive man" but "the best man available". The alpha of the tribe might look like a goblin, but the resources he commands may compensate for it - making him the target of hypergamy.
 
What do you mean? In those ancient times hypergamy was far more rampant than now. Less than half of human males got to reproduce. The alphas siring countless offspring.
"Face gud" isn't the only factor, obviously. Hypergamy doesn't mean "mate only with the most attractive man" but "the best man available". The alpha of the tribe might look like a goblin, but the resources he commands may compensate for it - making him the target of hypergamy.
I’m speaking about lookswise not overall status
 
it seems life in this universe, when it reaches an intelligent level, reproduction will lean towards hypergamy.
We and all other animals are like that. How is that even a question. Every animal is programmed to want the best partner possible to have the best offspring possible.
Just look at the schizo trad larpers on this website who unironically post shit like "i want a teen virgin waifu" - that is an example of hypergamy, they want the best partner possible. Even incels have this instinct in them.
 
it seems life in this universe, when it reaches an intelligent level, reproduction will lean towards hypergamy. Which in the long run is favorable to one gender only and dissallows species to work undivided towards conquering the cosmos. And instead keeps them focused on uh, well posting twerking videos on Tik Tok and making fun of incels apparently while the other half of the species rots
Seems the highest form of human life according to OP consists of mainly feminists and weak men who are afraid of the media
 
Seems the highest form of human life according to OP consists of mainly feminists and weak men who are afraid of the media
Is that not who all the cuck libtard niggas in Silicon Valley who own all the big tech companies are?:feelshaha:
 
My theory is that since Women are selecting the genes. They will keep getting breeded by low iq chads creating low iq offspring who are technically unfit according to Darwinian theory.

Before any fit man could rape a woman. Less fit men whether chad or incel would die.

So yeah women will breed low iq retards and stop Humanity's growth
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top