Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Masculine gays are never the problem

Celsior

Celsior

Greycel
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 4, 2024
Posts
474
Unlike trannies that are always inherently misandrist and destructive because toxic femininity (or better yet: the illusion of feminine superiority), masculine gays are actually surprisingly based (at times).

I’ve seen way too many based homos on “our side” with relatively blackpilled takes on r/mensrights. Their hearts in the right place, they just don’t know how (or don’t care enough) to properly support us, because they don’t get half the shit that we do on a daily basis in regard to our specific struggles, especially dating related + why should someone criticize the system when it benefits them?

It’s always the feminine gays who hate you for existing, and they’re the ones who’re worthy of your hatred and homophobia.

The ones that are masculine on the outside but still feminine on the inside don’t qualify for this category and they’re just as bad. They’re just basically gay but are too physically repulsive (and often fat/morbidly obese) to LARP as feminine despite probably wanting to.
 
Content Rule:
  • No gay or LGBT content, unless you're criticising it.

    Stop kissing the ass of faggots. Keep your tongue clean as well as this forum.
 
They’re just basically gay but are too physically repulsive (and often fat/morbidly obese) to LARP as feminine despite probably wanting to.
A good example of this btw would be Nikocado. Even though he was mostly a character, he’s suddenly more feminine and soft spoken now that he’s lost weight.
 
I am criticizing it. Read the post or stfu.
You are saying that masculine faggots are acceptable and feminine gays aren't.
It's grey and 50/50.
 
You are saying that masculine faggots are acceptable and feminine gays aren't.
It's grey and 50/50.
That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying the latter hates you and the former doesn’t. The former usually tends to be more misogynistic, also.
 
That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying the latter hates you and the former doesn’t.
You just reworded what I said. Not replying to you again.
Fag lover.
 
Being 'masculine' and avoiding your biological imperative to reproduce in order to stuff another mans asshole is indeed a 'problem'
 
Being 'masculine' and avoiding your biological imperative to reproduce in order to stuff another mans asshole is indeed a 'problem'
That’s a good point, but masculine as in someone with masculine characteristics and demeanor, not urges. It was used more as an adjective to describe their mannerisms.
 
That’s a good point, but masculine as in someone with masculine characteristics and demeanor, not urges. It was used more as an adjective to describe their mannerisms.
The number one urge of any male creature on this planet procreation, you cannot in any way be 'masculine' while giving up on seeking it.
I'd also never describe someone as 'masculine' if they're genuinely subhuman enough for relationships.

Not only are their lifestyles inherently emasculated, they're openly misandrist due to giving up on the life deservant of a man to pursue degeneracy.
 
Least homosupporting GrAY

I honestly don't care if they "support" incels or not, they are too far removed from our reality to really relate anyways
 
Last edited:
See you in the ban appeals.
You're one of my favorite greycels though so I hope it's not a permaban.
 
Last edited:
The number one urge of any male creature on this planet procreation, you cannot in any way be 'masculine' while giving up on seeking it.
So by that logic, is everyone on here including yourself emasculated by default because they fail to have sex with a woman?

That’s such an autistic way of going about it, because there’s like at least a million prettyboy-tier heterosexual men who have sex with women regularly and they’re all feminine misandrist twinks (and they have sex simply because they’re good-looking). Are they somehow more masculine than you?

Again, I don’t care about their purpose or how they choose to have sex with another man. What I meant by masculine was their attitude. You could argue that homosexuality is inherently emasculative for contradicting your biological programming on your own (and I could even agree with you), but don’t twist my own words.

See you in the ban appeals.
You're one of my favorite greycels though so I hope it's not a permaban.
All I did was write about what I observe. :feelsseriously: If anything, my post was more subliminally homophobic than the average blatant “kys faggot” post, but whatever.
 
Maybe I over exaggerated a little bit, but point being: they differ in that they find our beliefs and ideologies easier to digest. At the very least, they can see where we’re coming from vs. feminine gays who’re just as deplorable as the rest of them and want you dead on arrival.
 
So by that logic, is everyone on here including yourself emasculated by default because they fail to have sex with a woman?
I was emasculataed on the day I was born by the virtue of being a subhuman.

I never said having sex is what made one masculine, procreation and ensuring your offspring lead quality lives is (a factor to take into account).
Again, I don’t care about their purpose or how they choose to have sex with another man. What I meant by masculine was their attitude. You could argue that homosexuality is inherently emasculative for contradicting your biological programming on your own (and I could even agree with you), but don’t twist my own words.
Which part of their attitude is 'masculine'?
 
Unlike trannies that are always inherently misandrist and destructive because toxic femininity (or better yet: the illusion of feminine superiority), masculine gays are actually surprisingly based (at times).

I’ve seen way too many based homos on “our side” with relatively blackpilled takes on r/mensrights. Their hearts in the right place, they just don’t know how (or don’t care enough) to properly support us, because they don’t get half the shit that we do on a daily basis in regard to our specific struggles, especially dating related + why should someone criticize the system when it benefits them?

It’s always the feminine gays who hate you for existing, and they’re the ones who’re worthy of your hatred and homophobia.

The ones that are masculine on the outside but still feminine on the inside don’t qualify for this category and they’re just as bad. They’re just basically gay but are too physically repulsive (and often fat/morbidly obese) to LARP as feminine despite probably wanting to.
My brother in christ, this is the last place to be supporting gay people.
 
There’s no such thing as a masculine gay guy

He might pretend to be masculine. But if you don’t want to breed women, you’re not masculine
 
My brother in christ, this is the last place to be supporting gay people.
How and where did I “support” them exactly? I’m convinced none of you ever read any threads? :feelsseriously:

Honestly, you’re not beating any of the “incels are closeted homosexuals” allegations by being this hyper aggressively homophobic, because any homophobic argument that’s slightly more subtle (like my post) is suddenly met with confusion and a lot of anger.

It’s also interesting, because this forum collectively believes - (and so do I, hence I stand by what I said) - that almost every single child predator/groomer is the most feminine, soft, emasculated, sodomized Reddit tranny that there is (the male feminist stereotype exists for a reason, they are almost ALWAYS feminine from the inside, either by being too spiritually weak and demoralized or too much exposure to left-wing propaganda), but as soon as I say something that’s fully in tandem with this, just in a slightly different way and from a different angle, everyone thinks I’m speaking a different language. Hilarious.
 
But if you don’t want to breed women, you’re not masculine
I don't agree with this at all. A hermit, a monk etc are still "masculine"

The idea that a "real man" is a dude who wants pussy 24/7 was invented by women, so they never run out of betabuxxers.
 
Honestly, you’re not beating any of the “incels are closeted homosexuals” allegations by being this hyper aggressively homophobic, because any homophobic argument that’s slightly more subtle (like my post) is suddenly met with confusion and a lot of anger.
Bro I like you but stuff like this isn't helping your case at all. "Homophobia!!" :soy::soy::soy::feels: lmao
 
The idea that a "real man" is a dude who wants pussy 24/7 was invented by women, so they never run out of betabuxxers.
High IQ. There is a reason THE FIRST thing they do to get under a straight man’s skin (with whom they politically disagree) is to lance into his masculinity by calling him a faggot.

It’s all inclusion and progressivism to them, until it’s your turn, then suddenly being gay is a choice, and suddenly, being gay is execrable and cringeworthy enough to serve as an insult.
 
High IQ. There is a reason THE FIRST thing they do to get under a straight man’s skin (with whom they politically disagree) is to lance into his masculinity by calling him a faggot.

It’s all inclusion and progressivism to them, until it’s your turn, then suddenly being gay is a choice, and suddenly, being gay is execrable and cringeworthy enough to serve as an insult.
Yeah. I hope you're not catching a perma for this dude. You're a good poster.
 
Yeah. I hope you're not catching a perma for this dude. You're a good poster.
Why? It’s literally just a fact? :feelsseriously: IT cucks/leftists do it all the fucking time. Have you guys become brainwashed? What’s going on? :feelssus:
 
I don't agree with this at all. A hermit, a monk etc are still "masculine"

The idea that a "real man" is a dude who wants pussy 24/7 was invented by women, so they never run out of betabuxxers.
A hermit or a monk are volcels. Which is more masculine than begging another man to cum inside your asshole
 
A hermit or a monk are volcels. Which is more masculine than begging another man to cum inside your asshole
My comment has nothing do to with gay shit. I took the quoted statement as it is and responded to it.
 
Last edited:
How and where did I “support” them exactly? I’m convinced none of you ever read any threads? :feelsseriously:

Honestly, you’re not beating any of the “incels are closeted homosexuals” allegations by being this hyper aggressively homophobic, because any homophobic argument that’s slightly more subtle (like my post) is suddenly met with confusion and a lot of anger.

It’s also interesting, because this forum collectively believes - (and so do I, hence I stand by what I said) - that almost every single child predator/groomer is the most feminine, soft, emasculated, sodomized Reddit tranny that there is (the male feminist stereotype exists for a reason, they are almost ALWAYS feminine from the inside, either by being too spiritually weak and demoralized or too much exposure to left-wing propaganda), but as soon as I say something that’s fully in tandem with this, just in a slightly different way and from a different angle, everyone thinks I’m speaking a different language. Hilarious.
I'm not calling you gay, but saying anything less than negative about them here will get you banned.
 
My comment has nothing do to with gay shit. I took your comment as it is and responded to it.
Your argument was that monks and hermits are masculine, and they don’t fuck women.

But they also don’t fuck men. When you refuse to fuck women, your masculinity is questionable. When you WANT to fuck men, your masculinity is factually non existent
 
But they also don’t fuck men. When you refuse to fuck women, your masculinity is questionable. When you WANT to fuck men, your masculinity is factually non existent
Yeah I 100% agree with your statement about fags, not so much with the refusal to fuck women bit. A woman doesn't make a man, again that's foid propaganda.

I took your previous sentence at face value, meaning I interpreted it as being directed at men in general, which is why I brought up hermits and similar examples.

When we're talking about gays it's obvious there's nothing manly about taking it up the ass lol, this wasn't my point. I edited the comment to clarify, but failed :cryfeels:
 
Last edited:
All I did was write about what I observe. :feelsseriously: If anything, my post was more subliminally homophobic than the average blatant “kys faggot” post, but whatever.
I don't think you should get banned for this, greycels & 2024cels just tend to get moderated far more heavily.
 
There’s no such thing as a masculine gay guy

He might pretend to be masculine. But if you don’t want to breed women, you’re not masculine
Faggots can be masculine. Same with femoids. Masculinity is your behaviour not who you are attracted to.
 
Faggots can be masculine. Same with femoids. Masculinity is your behaviour not who you are attracted to.
Good point, but tbh I better get the fuck out of here before I'm catching a ban. This topic is weird af.
 
Faggots can be masculine. Same with femoids. Masculinity is your behaviour not who you are attracted to.
They can pretend to be masculine. But they’re not. They take penis up the asshole and like it. Not masculine
 
 
nigga dont talk about gays at all
 
fag chad mogs me
 
They can pretend to be masculine. But they’re not. They take penis up the asshole and like it. Not masculine
chad is bisexual and gets attention from both male and female
 
I honestly don't care if they "support" incels or not, they are too far removed from our reality to really relate anyways
foids support lgbt because they hate subhumans
 
Being 'masculine' and avoiding your biological imperative to reproduce in order to stuff another mans asshole is indeed a 'problem'
It could be an act of desperation like there could be lack of access of foids and the guy just want to experience sex
 

Similar threads

zalikell.ir.ilxyne:
Replies
15
Views
245
fatass30000
fatass30000
Stupid Clown
Replies
27
Views
261
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
Lurkercel_678
Replies
35
Views
805
Lurkercel_678
Lurkercel_678
J
Replies
26
Views
374
Anarcho Nihilist
Anarcho Nihilist

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top