Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

TeeHee man up and raise another mans child private!

  • Thread starter Deleted member 14866
  • Start date
Deleted member 14866

Deleted member 14866

prescriber of dogpills
-
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Posts
14,142
image0.jpg


what do you mean "you almost got your nuts blown off by a landmine"? its too late to use those things soldier.
 
dumb foid, seems like bait though tbh
 
i want to kill that whore
 
Should change the name to "This is some weird shit to believe in"
 
Looks kinda larpy
 
Reminder : this statement used to be impossible, it is now being openly said by a few people, and in a few years it will be said by everyone all the time.
 
gut it out on a landmine or divorce rape? So fucking hell of a decision :waitwhat:
 
She should pay child support if that happens.
 
This woman should be shot with an M4 in GTA: Online
 
Say whatever you want about MGTOW, they do have at least one point right : do not get married in this day and age.
 
Reminder : this statement used to be impossible, it is now being openly said by a few people, and in a few years it will be said by everyone all the time.
Imagine a woman saying this in 1930 lmfao
 
Wait if they're married how is he not forced to finance it? Seems like they're shaming but isn't that the cucked laws?
 
Imagine a woman saying this in 1930 lmfao

She would have been stoned JFL, especially at a time where every man was drafted and sent to a world war.

In 2030, every woman will say it as she wants and all men will be bound to accept, otherwise they are silly inkels that deserve to be hanged!
 
Wait if they're married how is he not forced to finance it? Seems like they're shaming but isn't that the cucked laws?

Not sure. Even in France where paternity tests are banned, they can still happen by court order, which suggests that a judge can take the adultery and non-paternity into account when settling a divorce.

I wouldn't hold my breath, though. It seems that the spirit of the law is primarily the interest of the child (so they say anyway), thus if the "father" can afford to pay, they will make him pay no matter what the actual filiation is.
 
She would have been stoned JFL, especially at a time where every man was drafted and sent to a world war.

In 2030, every woman will say it as she wants and all men will be bound to accept, otherwise they are silly inkels that deserve to be hanged!

Sad part is, it's too late to go back to putting women in their place.
 

Similar threads

Balding Subhuman
Replies
8
Views
510
InternalJizzz
InternalJizzz
E
Replies
9
Views
392
solblue
solblue
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
7
Views
436
Serious
Serious

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top