Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Male attractiveness distribution is tight

S

strange_to_be

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Posts
398
Men Compensate based off their attractiveness level. I know far more 5'9'' and less gym goers than 6'0" and similarly for ugly vs attractive faces. Post high school athletes tend to let themselves get chunky. Men with no success with women may try to lose weight to reach a level of rapport.

I think there's a gravitational pull towards average. Men that are low genetic advantage work out and eat less. Men that are naturally large aren't motivated to eat healthy or exercise. There are long tails because some genetically advantaged men have healthy habits.

To me this means most people should be able to hit above average which means achieving a wall hitting woman should be possible. The lack of appeal is that the top 15%, where women actually want to have sex with men, is still out of reach or only achievable through an absurd lifestyle for genetically disadvantaged
 
the point your making is wrong even though everything you said is somewhat true
 
7 years on here and yet still so bluepilled
definitionally it's true that everyone can hit above average. 50% of people are above average and 99% of men don't hit their physical and success potential. The average male body fat percentage in the US is 28%, so if they all the ones over 28% dropped to 12% a significant portion of that 50% would move above the previous average level.
 
definitionally it's true that everyone can hit above average. 50% of people are above average and 99% of men don't hit their physical and success potential. The average male body fat percentage in the US is 28%, so if they all the ones over 28% dropped to 12% a significant portion of that 50% would move above the previous average level.
No gym for your height
 
No gym for your height
That's fine because height isn't the real metric. The real metric is lean body mass. What you don't understand is that 1 inch of height is 5 free pounds of lean body mass so you have to be committed to the gym for years to overcome 6 inches of height difference and 8 inches is pretty much unsurmountable
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top