Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Cope M-muh empty carton of eggs

Angry_runt

Angry_runt

Cursed OGcel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
12,446
MSTOW and redpillers lost another cope. How long can they hold on?

For the first time in U.S. history, more women over the age of 40 are having kids compared to teen moms
Women over 30 accounted for more than one-half of births (51.4%) in 2023, compared to only three in 10 births in 1990.

 
Future generations are going to be fucked thanks to selfish roasties
 
more autists made

Autism1
Autism2


It doesn't seem that strongly related.
The main risk for older mothers is Down syndrome and even that is only 1% and they can abort the pregnancy. Every year in the US there are around 5500 Down syndrome newborns.

Downies
 
Last edited:
Birth defect factory @Stupid Clown
 
Genetic quality decreases even if it doesn’t result in downy babies is what I’ve heard
 
View attachment 1428856View attachment 1428857

It doesn't seem that strongly related.
The main risk for older mothers is Down syndrome and even that is only 1% and they can abort the pregnancy. Every year in the US there are around 5500 Down syndrome newborns.

View attachment 1428858
I'd rather have them pop 2-3 out by 20 and dump them out of the society. Waste of resources.
It's not that they don't conceive, it's that the conceiving gets progressively difficult, incurring more medical cost. I'd rather not have these whores eating and shitting in a society that they don't deserve.
Genetic quality decreases even if it doesn’t result in downy babies is what I’ve heard
Yes. He's just picking and choosing (extreme) examples.

Fucking down syndrome. You're the one coping on foids' behalf.
 
Last edited:
https://www.stanfordchildrens.org/en/topic/default?id=risks-of-pregnancy-over-age-30-90-P02481
The risk for chromosome problems increases with the mother's age. The chance of having a child with Down syndrome increases over time. The risk is about 1 in 1,250 for a woman who conceives at age 25. It increases to about 1 in 100 for a woman who conceives at age 40. The risks may be higher. This is because many statistics only report live births. They do not note pregnancies with chromosome problems that ended due to pregnancy loss.
So, the likelihood of down syndrome rises by ten folds once a roastie reaches 40. And that's just for live births.
Some studies have shown a higher chance of miscarriage (early pregnancy loss) in older mothers. For all women, about half of first trimester miscarriages happen because of a chromosome problem in the baby. The risk of chromosome problems increase with the mother’s age. So miscarriage is also more likely.
Studies show that for 40+ roasties, the chances of a miscarriage can range from 40-50%. It seems most of them happen because of chromosome related issues. So, while they technically can give birth to babies seemingly without problems, even though the baby still inherits some genetic abnormalities which lead to a larger genetic disorder down the line, it comes with massive social and economic liabilities.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2021/maternal-mortality-rates-2021.htm
They are a liability even to themselves. 40+ roasties are 6-7 times more likely to succumb to maternal death.
 
So, the likelihood of down syndrome rises by ten folds once a roastie reaches 40. And that's just for live births.
All that is in the graph I posted. But most foids have those downie kids either because they didn't want to abort them or because they didn't do the test during pregnancy. In countries like Denmark or Iceland that offer free screening, there's only 10-20 downie babies born every year. It's 3x lower rate compared to the US. In the UK in 2010s the number of downie babies dropped by half despite the ever rising average age of the mother.

You're the one coping on foids' behalf.
It's the MSTOW and redpillers who are coping by thinking they'll ever be on the same level as foids of any age. So they make young guys believe they just need to grind and self-improve and bide their time, all the while foids get assisted reproductive tech and ever more attention and SMV. We're all on limited time, but women in their 50s will be having healthy kids before the cure for norwooding will be found.
 
Let the women over 40 have kids that are dysgenic af, and see how that goes since I know from having an old mom that it gives all kinds of issues and many kids from older moms are even more dysgenic than me
 
Genetic quality decreases even if it doesn’t result in downy babies is what I’ve heard
It decreases because the cells of the ovaries, in human foids at least, do not ever regenerate.
From birth and on they stay the same.

So the DNA in the gets corrupted over time, through polution, bad eating habbits, drugs etc. .

This is why it is important to breed them young.
Even incels should not breed with roasties.

If you want to use surrogacy for procreation, make sure that the egg donor is very young.

As young as possible and has lived a healthy life.

Otherwise the chances of making a retard baby are higher.
 
As if a fertility crisis wasn’t enough, the few kids produced will be less healthy than previous generations. That will further increase the burden on the working age population
 
As if a fertility crisis wasn’t enough, the few kids produced will be less healthy than previous generations. That will further increase the burden on the working age population
Not my problem
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
17
Views
1K
erenyeager
erenyeager
Rabbi Schneerson
Replies
10
Views
343
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
TheJester
Replies
10
Views
516
TheJester
TheJester
InMemoriam
Replies
23
Views
2K
VλREN
VλREN

Users who are viewing this thread

  • cutthroat
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top