Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

(Low IQ THREAD MUST HAVE AN IQ BELOW 60 TO POST HERE) How would you fix the middle east?

SyrianSchizoSage

SyrianSchizoSage

Dysfunctional Deracinated Demon
★★★
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Posts
799
Fund every single separatist group like America did.
They really said let these sandniggers compete in a darwinian battle royale typa sheet.

Syria: HTS won for now? They seem to be doing well touch wood to avert the evil eye.

Lebanon: Might quell Hezbollah and absorb it with either Israeli and Syrian help or both.

Iraq still has major issues which might never get fixed ie weak central gov I think SHiite miltias and Kurds are more equipped than the Army but I am not too knowledgeable about this area.

Jordan is under Zog protection.
Turkey is going dictatorship mode no saving it now.

HARD MODE: You can't divide by sect.
 
Nuke the entire ME
 
Nukes would be good but imo middle east deserves to be colonised by china so it can be exploited as much as it can be without having major wars . the Most chinese would is just wipe a specific ethnicity or two , which is better than nuking the whole ME.
 
Nuke the entire ME
why would we nuke the Middle East? All the best combat and gore vids are from there?
Nukes would be good but imo middle east deserves to be colonised by china so it can be exploited as much as it can be without having major wars . the Most chinese would is just wipe a specific ethnicity or two , which is better than nuking the whole ME.
 
So go nuke Curries then?
Nothing entertaining over there
@pizzamaxxer
 
Fund every single separatist group like America did.
They really said let these sandniggers compete in a darwinian battle royale typa sheet.

Syria: HTS won for now? They seem to be doing well touch wood to avert the evil eye.

Lebanon: Might quell Hezbollah and absorb it with either Israeli and Syrian help or both.

Iraq still has major issues which might never get fixed ie weak central gov I think SHiite miltias and Kurds are more equipped than the Army but I am not too knowledgeable about this area.

Jordan is under Zog protection.
Turkey is going dictatorship mode no saving it now.

HARD MODE: You can't divide by sect.
Let one state conquer all the others, that's all. Let Saudi Arabia conquer Iraq, Syria, Jordan, other countries in the region and that's it. No one will fight each other as long as they all serve the same king (tyrant, dictator, emperor, caliph), given that the majority of the region's inhabitants are Sunnis, there will be few problems. As long as people have one common master, they will serve him. Many countries that are currently torn apart by contradictions or civil war were relatively stable as long as they had a common monarch (such as Afghanistan, where there was order before the fall of the monarchy) or Iraq under the Hashemites before the fall of the monarchy. Arab countries are not suitable for secular socialist republics or liberal democracies, they need a monarchy. Just give all the countries and regions, or at least all where the Sunni Arabs are the majority, to one royal family (for example, the Saudis) and everything.
 
Fund every single separatist group like America did.
They really said let these sandniggers compete in a darwinian battle royale typa sheet.

Syria: HTS won for now? They seem to be doing well touch wood to avert the evil eye.

Lebanon: Might quell Hezbollah and absorb it with either Israeli and Syrian help or both.

Iraq still has major issues which might never get fixed ie weak central gov I think SHiite miltias and Kurds are more equipped than the Army but I am not too knowledgeable about this area.

Jordan is under Zog protection.
Turkey is going dictatorship mode no saving it now.

HARD MODE: You can't divide by sect.
This is how such issues have been resolved since ancient times, it's just that a strong tribe and its leader appeared, who forcibly conquered other tribes that had previously constantly fought with each other and then under a common leader they marched in a single army. Damn it, the Habsburgs had in their empire (Germans, Hungarians, Italians, Poles, Croats, Czechs, Ukrainians, Slovaks, Transylvanian Romanians) and despite everything this empire existed, since all peoples had a common monarch and the majority of the empire's population were Roman Catholics. She was a strong family, step by step, through wars or marriages, increasing the possessions and rules of different subjects of different nationalities, simply based on the common title of the monarch of the emperor and the common faith.
 
Fund every single separatist group like America did.
They really said let these sandniggers compete in a darwinian battle royale typa sheet.

Syria: HTS won for now? They seem to be doing well touch wood to avert the evil eye.

Lebanon: Might quell Hezbollah and absorb it with either Israeli and Syrian help or both.

Iraq still has major issues which might never get fixed ie weak central gov I think SHiite miltias and Kurds are more equipped than the Army but I am not too knowledgeable about this area.

Jordan is under Zog protection.
Turkey is going dictatorship mode no saving it now.

HARD MODE: You can't divide by sect.
Instead of today's Italy and Germany, there would have been many small states if one kingdom, led by its royal dynasty, had not begun to conquer or otherwise take control of other kingdoms. The Kingdom of Piedmont and house of Savoy conquered other Italian states. Kingdom of Prussia and the Hohenzollern family took control of other German kingdoms after defeating France in 1871. If one Arab kingdom led by a dynasty began to conquer other Arab countries step by step, then there would be a single Arab state, the same as Italy or Germany today.
 
who are you gonna hate then, nigger? nah it's boring
I don't hate them but they present an extreme danger to the world also includes traditional medicine chinks who caused countless viruses.
 
Instead of today's Italy and Germany, there would have been many small states if one kingdom, led by its royal dynasty, had not begun to conquer or otherwise take control of other kingdoms. The Kingdom of Piedmont and house of Savoy conquered other Italian states. Kingdom of Prussia and the Hohenzollern family took control of other German kingdoms after defeating France in 1871. If one Arab kingdom led by a dynasty began to conquer other Arab countries step by step, then there would be a single Arab state, the same as Italy or Germany today.
I guess Saddam was trying to attempt that if he neutralized Iran unfortunately he did not succeed.
 
woah there, i'm not a pajeet.
If you want to see the aftermath so badly why not go to more populated countries like India and CHina more casualties no?
 
Instead of today's Italy and Germany, there would have been many small states if one kingdom, led by its royal dynasty, had not begun to conquer or otherwise take control of other kingdoms. The Kingdom of Piedmont and house of Savoy conquered other Italian states. Kingdom of Prussia and the Hohenzollern family took control of other German kingdoms after defeating France in 1871. If one Arab kingdom led by a dynasty began to conquer other Arab countries step by step, then there would be a single Arab state, the same as Italy or Germany today.
You think it might happen in the Middle East maybe even through peaceful means
 
You think it might happen in the Middle East maybe even through peaceful means
I think so, but not by peaceful means, but by military means. Some large and powerful state (for example, Saudi Arabia) could conquer neighboring Arab countries with a Sunni majority and eventually it would become a single nation with a single and common king. I do not know about Iraq, there are too many Shiites there, but the Saudis could include Jordan and Syria, since the majority of Sunni Arabs live there, and there would be no problems, since the language would be common, as well as religion in the form of Sunni Islam. Previous attempts to create a common Arab state were unsuccessful, as dictators from military officers and military juntas, such as Nasser in Egypt, with his attempt to create a united Arab republic of Egypt and Syria, were engaged in this. A monarchy would have handled this better than a republic.
 
I wound nuke every major city
 
Persian Empire Sequel when
 
I think so, but not by peaceful means, but by military means. Some large and powerful state (for example, Saudi Arabia) could conquer neighboring Arab countries with a Sunni majority and eventually it would become a single nation with a single and common king. I do not know about Iraq, there are too many Shiites there, but the Saudis could include Jordan and Syria, since the majority of Sunni Arabs live there, and there would be no problems, since the language would be common, as well as religion in the form of Sunni Islam. Previous attempts to create a common Arab state were unsuccessful, as dictators from military officers and military juntas, such as Nasser in Egypt, with his attempt to create a united Arab republic of Egypt and Syria, were engaged in this. A monarchy would have handled this better than a republic.
interesting Saudis and Levantines are quiet different so I doubt they would form together.
It was unsuccessful because of Nasser but an Arab super state would be interesting
 
Let one state conquer all the others, that's all. Let Saudi Arabia conquer Iraq, Syria, Jordan, other countries in the region and that's it. No one will fight each other as long as they all serve the same king (tyrant, dictator, emperor, caliph), given that the majority of the region's inhabitants are Sunnis, there will be few problems. As long as people have one common master, they will serve him. Many countries that are currently torn apart by contradictions or civil war were relatively stable as long as they had a common monarch (such as Afghanistan, where there was order before the fall of the monarchy) or Iraq under the Hashemites before the fall of the monarchy. Arab countries are not suitable for secular socialist republics or liberal democracies, they need a monarchy. Just give all the countries and regions, or at least all where the Sunni Arabs are the majority, to one royal family (for example, the Saudis) and everything.
@SyrianSchizoSage best possible solution for ME
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top