Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Love and lust are evolutionarily adapted in the limbic system for the purpose of enslaving men and limiting their abilities

  • Thread starter Deleted member 35239
  • Start date
Deleted member 35239

Deleted member 35239

Lux Et Veritas
-
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Posts
118
The feelings of lust are arguably equal or in some cases stronger for women, but love isn't. Countless documented historical accounts and modern infidelity horror stories are a testament to the inherently whorish nature of women. The moment a flirtatious male who is sufficiently stronger characteristically appears, emotional affairs begin and then transition to full blown affairs if the opportunity is available. If they aren't able to have a full blown affair due to too much perceived risk, they will begin imagining that they're having sex with them while they're with you, and when their using sex toys on the side.

You can often even see this happen when women discuss A-list celebrities - men who they haven't even met - with their girlfriends, and about how they'd straddle Chris Hemsworth at the first opportunity.

In other words, the only reason why the already ridiculously high affair rate isn't higher is because of lack of opportunity.

Now going back to the title, why are men generally more faithful then women? It's because we're inclined by nature to be more loyal so we can protect the woman and raise (hopefully what is our) offspring with the security we provide. Why do some of them become doormats at the sight of tits, despite their every other interaction indicating they'd act differently? It's because we're wired by nature to have our personalities overwritten when opportunities related to sex and procreation present themselves. Love and lust both unfold in our minds, making us both emotionally attached and desiring of the pleasure sex can provide.

Women are wired differently. They're designed by nature to cling to the man who has closer to what they perceive as ideal characteristics and security, while also desiring the pleasure of sex. Because they can keep pumping out kids, by nature, their emotional attachment isn't as fixed. In order for them to be fully loyal their partner either has to constantly demonstrate superiority over other men, or receive enough pressure from society (like the consequence of severe punishments like reeducation camps) and from strict training.

Men entertaining and supporting the notion that women are equal to us is emasculating, and the very reason why they aren't loyal in the first place.
 
Last edited:
many foids with "loyal" genes were killed in foreign invasions.
 
The feelings of lust are arguably equal or in some cases stronger for women, but love isn't. Countless documented historical accounts and modern infidelity horror stories are a testament to the inherently whorish nature of women. The moment a flirtatious male who is sufficiently stronger characteristically appears, emotional affairs begin and then transition to full blown affairs if the opportunity is available. If they aren't able to have a full blown affair due to too much perceived risk, they will begin imagining that they're having sex with them while they're with you, and when their using sex toys on the side.

You can often even see this happen when women discuss A-list celebrities - men who they haven't even met - with their girlfriends, and about how they'd straddle Chris Hemsworth at the first opportunity.

In other words, the only reason why the already ridiculously high affair rate isn't higher is because of lack of opportunity.

Now going back to the title, why are men generally more faithful then women? It's because we're inclined by nature to be more loyal so we can protect the woman and raise (hopefully what is our) offspring with the security we provide. Why do some of them become doormats at the sight of tits, despite their every other interaction indicating they'd act differently? It's because we're wired by nature to have our personalities overwritten when opportunities related to sex and procreation present themselves. Love and lust both unfold in our minds, making us both emotionally attached and desiring of the pleasure sex can provide.

Women are wired differently. They're designed by nature to cling to the man who has closer to what they perceive as ideal characteristics and security, while also desiring the pleasure of sex. Because they can keep pumping out kids, by nature, their emotional attachment isn't as fixed. In order for them to be fully loyal their partner either has to constantly demonstrate superiority over other men, or receive enough pressure from society (like the consequence of severe punishments like reeducation camps) and from strict training.

Men entertaining and supporting the notion that women are equal to us is emasculating, and the very reason why they aren't loyal in the first place.
Based post is based
many foids with "loyal" genes were killed in foreign invasions.
Huh interesting point yeah
 

Similar threads

Efiliste
Replies
23
Views
658
caineturbat2003
caineturbat2003
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
6
Views
222
Julaybib
Julaybib

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top