TLDR: Proof that if you have non-chad traits, you are more likely to become gay to cope.
Artificial intelligence can accurately guess whether people are gay or straight based on photos of their faces, according to new research. The study from Stanford University – which found that a computer algorithm could correctly distinguish between gay and straight men 81% of the time. When the software reviewed five images per person, it was even more successful – 91% .
The article originally predicts this is because :
1.) The research found that gay men and women tended to have “gender-atypical” features, expressions and “grooming styles”, essentially meaning gay men appeared more feminine and vice versa.
2.) The paper suggested that the findings provide “strong support” for the theory that sexual orientation stems from exposure to certain hormones before birth, meaning people are born gay and being queer is not a choice.
However If you are blackpilled other things clearly stand out:
The data also identified certain trends, including that gay men had narrower jaws, longer noses and larger foreheads than straight men, and that gay women had larger jaws and smaller foreheads compared to straight women.
Millimeters of bone theory proved.
This is actual PROOF that your looks completely influence how you are treated by society and then you go and cope by becoming gay. If It was actually about hormones, You would have studies about hormones and gayness. Instead, you can find out with 90+% accuracy just by taking a picture of the person.
In the end obviously, this kind of research was heavily (((criticized))) and was shut down. This is why you will never have blackpilled studies allowed to become popular or more concrete (better p values and more sample sizes), because anything linking looks to personality is extremely discouraged.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/technol...ether-youre-gay-or-straight-from-a-photograph
Artificial intelligence can accurately guess whether people are gay or straight based on photos of their faces, according to new research. The study from Stanford University – which found that a computer algorithm could correctly distinguish between gay and straight men 81% of the time. When the software reviewed five images per person, it was even more successful – 91% .
The article originally predicts this is because :
1.) The research found that gay men and women tended to have “gender-atypical” features, expressions and “grooming styles”, essentially meaning gay men appeared more feminine and vice versa.
2.) The paper suggested that the findings provide “strong support” for the theory that sexual orientation stems from exposure to certain hormones before birth, meaning people are born gay and being queer is not a choice.
However If you are blackpilled other things clearly stand out:
The data also identified certain trends, including that gay men had narrower jaws, longer noses and larger foreheads than straight men, and that gay women had larger jaws and smaller foreheads compared to straight women.
Millimeters of bone theory proved.
This is actual PROOF that your looks completely influence how you are treated by society and then you go and cope by becoming gay. If It was actually about hormones, You would have studies about hormones and gayness. Instead, you can find out with 90+% accuracy just by taking a picture of the person.
In the end obviously, this kind of research was heavily (((criticized))) and was shut down. This is why you will never have blackpilled studies allowed to become popular or more concrete (better p values and more sample sizes), because anything linking looks to personality is extremely discouraged.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/technol...ether-youre-gay-or-straight-from-a-photograph
