Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Lookism is REAL: CEO of national coffee chain encourages giving out free coffee to Chads and Stacies

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1783
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 1783

Self-banned
-
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Posts
1,527
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/21/free-pret-coffee_n_7112796.html

Clive Schlee told the London Evening Standard that he has started allowing his staff to give out a certain number of free coffee or food to customers they like — and that apparently includes those employees’ romantic interests.
“The staff have to give away a certain number of hot drinks and food every week,” Schlee said. “They will decide, ‘I like the person on the bicycle,’ or ‘I like the guy in that tie,’ or ‘I fancy that girl or that boy.’”
There’s a limit on how many items employees can give away each week, but Schlee said the new policy will result in 28 percent of customers walking away with something free, Time magazine reports.

28 percent? Demonstrates the 80/20 rule: women find only the top 20% of men attractive, i.e. NOT SUB 8 MEN.

Lookism has real effects. JFL at anyone who claims otherwise. If you're Chad, your coffee will always be free thanks to the barista who wants to ride your dick.
 
Last edited:
A8155342 FD32 4A73 BF3E 786555081AC4
 
Change this from JFL to something more accurate, like Blackpill or ragefuel
 
This is no different than how nightclubs have been letting good looking people in for free and letting them skip the line for years.

It's also no different from how many clothing companies only make clothes that will fit men 5'10"+ (ever try on a shirt that's size "small" yet it hangs down to you mid thighs? Yeah, that's not accidental).

This is the next step in the evolution. Where good looking people will just get free shit for being good looking as a matter of daily routine.

Ever see that episode of Black Mirror where everyone has to "rate" each other all the time, and the higher your score the more shit you qualify for in life?

Yeah, that's it.

No one wants their shit associated with ugly people and everyone wants to reward good looking people. At least this will be honest in that respect. People will learn their places in the hierarchy.
 
Lmao, what a dipshit. This is going to back fire big time. Why the fuck should uglies pay for coffee that Chad gets for free? Most coffee drinkers are wageslaves anyways, so watch what happens.
 
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/21/free-pret-coffee_n_7112796.html



28 percent? Demonstrates the 80/20 rule: women find only the top 20% of men attractive, i.e. NOT SUB 8 MEN.

Lookism has real effects. JFL at anyone who claims otherwise. If you're Chad, your coffee will always be free thanks to the barista who wants to ride your dick.

It's over!

Even average to ugly girls get their names or little hearts drawn on her coffee cup. I remember overhearing this JB chick and her friend talking about how a barista once put some extra whipped cream on the tip of her straw then winked at her.

Guys like us don't even get a dot written on our cup, they legit want us out asap. Good thing I'm not a coffee person and I hate those places. Last time I went into one, it was all awkward and they all looked at me af if they were ready to Raid spray me.
 
Change this from JFL to something more accurate, like Blackpill or ragefuel
Done thanks
Lmao, what a dipshit. This is going to back fire big time. Why the fuck should uglies pay for coffee that Chad gets for free? Most coffee drinkers are wageslaves anyways, so watch what happens.
It also infuriates me when employees make their own free drinks behind their boss's back, yet expect you to pay $7 for an overpriced coffee at the chain.
 
Last edited:
This CEO is trying to virtue signal and show how "caring" he is by giving people stuff for free, but the only people who are going to benefit from this are those who are already privileged.
 
Whoever made that decision needs to be removed immediately from the board
 
Remember when the CEO of Abercrombie and Fitch said he didn't want fat and unattractive people wearing his clothes? He got shit for that (from cucks and normies) but, it's the truth.
 
It makes sense, people want to do what the attractive people do.

Monkey see, Monkey do.
 
There is a caste system in our society that divides attractive and unattractive people. This is one extra step in enabling it.
 
Being ugly in a public space is a crime to normal people. You bring down the coolness and rating of the establishment, and anyone inside it.

All they need to do is figure out how to criminalize being ugly, which is essentially just banning all men with exceptions for the top 10 or 20%.
 
This CEO is trying to virtue signal and show how "caring" he is by giving people stuff for free, but the only people who are going to benefit from this are those who are already privileged.

The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. And that saying doesn't only apply to monetary wealth.

You ever notice how rich famous celebrities always have people giving them free stuff?
 
Lookism now extends to coffee and Danish pastries, what a time to be alive.
 
The constant war against the Uggos continues. :feelsbadman:
Lookism now extends to coffee and Danish pastries, what a time to be alive.
:feelscry:
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. And that saying doesn't only apply to monetary wealth.

You ever notice how rich famous celebrities always have people giving them free stuff?
Fucking hate celebrities, especially when they are panhandling for that stupid Christmas Aid bullshit. These people literally have so much money, Billions on them and yet people still donate because of Lookism. If all celebrities got together and payed for the third world to have things the first world has, poverty would disappear, famine would disappear, war would disappear. All the things bad with the world would be a nightmare and nothing more but no, the reality is that they won't because they are greedy little fuckers. Whenever a celebrity dies these days I can't help but smile to myself.
 
Last edited:
This is no different than how nightclubs have been letting good looking people in for free and letting them skip the line for years.

It's also no different from how many clothing companies only make clothes that will fit men 5'10"+ (ever try on a shirt that's size "small" yet it hangs down to you mid thighs? Yeah, that's not accidental).

This is the next step in the evolution. Where good looking people will just get free shit for being good looking as a matter of daily routine.

Ever see that episode of Black Mirror where everyone has to "rate" each other all the time, and the higher your score the more shit you qualify for in life?

Yeah, that's it.

No one wants their shit associated with ugly people and everyone wants to reward good looking people. At least this will be honest in that respect. People will learn their places in the hierarchy.

Highest IQ post I’ve seen here in a while.
 
Whoever made that decision needs to be removed immediately from the board

Whoever supports lookism to the fucking point that the company HAS to give items for free to people they like (and guess what, that will depend on LOOKS9 needs to be KILLED.
Ever see that episode of Black Mirror where everyone has to "rate" each other all the time, and the higher your score the more shit you qualify for in life?
.

Holy shit is there an episode like that? Rating was based on looks?
By the way Sticky this post and post it on Braincels. Its a jeremy Meeks level blackpill.

If you don't want to post it on braincels, mind if I do?
 
Last edited:
This is a pretty moronic financial decision by the company. There's not going to be much benefit to giving out free coffee to people based on employee discretion. All this will do is reduce revenues from people getting free coffee and reduce revenues from the people upset at not getting free coffee.
 
This is a pretty moronic financial decision by the company. There's not going to be much benefit to giving out free coffee to people based on employee discretion. All this will do is reduce revenues from people getting free coffee and reduce revenues from the people upset at not getting free coffee.

Also this. Seeing Chad get free stuff when you pay for it? People would actually stop going there to not be compared to Chad in such a horrid way.
 
Honestly, this would be easy to use to fuck over starbucks, even for uggos. Just tell the barista that you’ll tip her half the price of the coffee (or less) if you get your drink for free.

Just saw that there were employee limits... ah well, might still be worth a shot.
 
Where are you now SJWs?
 
The Ceo of this company probably did a field study and it showed him that most men are cucks, so he knows he don't risk any outcry. Remember that most men are deluded about their looks, and consider themselves not as average/below average (which most men are according to women) but as temporarily embarassed chads, so they'll just tell themselves bluepilled lies like "that guy got coffee because he smiles more, i should smile more" "he got a free coffee because he was more confident, i'll just have to emulate him and i'll get a free coffee someday" an average guy will get someday a freecoffee because he's walking a cute dog, and thinks there is no discrimination based on looks while forgetting chad got 20 times more free coffee than him, so instead of provoking an outcry and boycoting the company, i'm afraid men are so cucked they will just roll with it.
 
As if any male but Chad will receive those free items:lul:
 
As if any male but Chad will receive those free items:lul:

We know this, but bluepill men will keep lying to themselves, they won't rebell, and they will be told just to smile more, wear perfume, and take showers to get free coffee. A minority of them would still get free coffee when they meet a barista who is having a good day or because they are walking a cute puppy or having a baby with them, and people will refer to those exceptional cases "look, that average guy still got a coffee, proof it's about personality" without mentioning that 95% of free coffees went only for femoids and chads.
 
fuck this gay eartyh
 
That's why I don't do coffee houses, which is considered odd for a consultant. But fuck, I drive up in a nice car, dressed well, clearly with money, and still get treated like shit. Baristas (especially femoids) sneer at me, I had my orders messed up several times on purpose, plus coffee is shit.

So I said fuck it. When I'm on a job and need a place to sit (either with the clients or alone) it's bars or nothing.
 
LOOKS ARE EVERYTHING JFL AT BEING UGLY FUCK THIS EARTH ALLAHU AHKBAR
 
You will never be desired by anyone.
 
W
Holy shit is there an episode like that? Rating was based on looks?

It wasn't expressly about "looks" but just more about a culture where your popularity and favorability dictates everything else. Yelp on steroids.

Rating was based on everything. People just rated everyone constantly all the time. How nice of a customer they were. How nice of a service. It was basically hell with everyone trying to suck each other's dicks constantly.

And your rating score then affected everything else in your life. Eg. You might not get to rent in a certain apartment unless you had a certain amount of "like" ratings. Because they only wanted the best in each building, etc.

In reality, it would be about looks 90% as we know looks = personality.

This was the episode:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5497778/
 
There is a caste system in our society that divides attractive and unattractive people. This is one extra step in enabling it.

You are only partially correct, it is only MEN who can't be unattractive, as this "lookism" is largely based on SMV, a 3/10 foid has about as much pull as a 7/10 man, or more. Only men have to be good looking.
 
You are only partially correct, it is only MEN who can't be unattractive, as this "lookism" is largely based on SMV, a 3/10 foid has about as much pull as a 7/10 man, or more. Only men have to be good looking.
Oh yeah, absolutely.
 
It wasn't expressly about "looks" but just more about a culture where your popularity and favorability dictates everything else. Yelp on steroids.

Rating was based on everything. People just rated everyone constantly all the time. How nice of a customer they were. How nice of a service. It was basically hell with everyone trying to suck each other's dicks constantly.

And your rating score then affected everything else in your life. Eg. You might not get to rent in a certain apartment unless you had a certain amount of "like" ratings. Because they only wanted the best in each building, etc.

In reality, it would be about looks 90% as we know looks = personality.

This was the episode:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5497778/

Sounds like IncelTears' dream and everyone else's nightmare.

Of course, IT would only consider it a dream because they're delusional enough to think that spending all their time making fun of incels somehow puts them at the top of society. If that situation ever came to pass in reality, those fools would get an unpleasant surprise.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top