Theory "Longhouse" a concept that helps us understand the current social structure

[Limitcel]

What Is the Longhouse? | L0m3z

The Longhouse refers to the remarkable overcorrection of the last two generations toward social norms centering feminine needs and feminine methods for controlling, directing, and modeling behavior.

www.firstthings.com

The historical longhouse was a large communal hall, serving as the social focal point for many cultures and peoples throughout the world that were typically more sedentary and agrarian. In online discourse, this historical function gets generalized to contemporary patterns of social organization, in particular the exchange of privacy—and its attendant autonomy—for the modest comforts and security of collective living.

The longhouse is a matriarchal large group of people in a small space highly dependent on the approval of others, in the longhouse the community always takes precedence over the individual, it is how a female system is organized, the feminine (whether as a woman or as a beta) is always very influenced by the judgment of others and always tries to judge too (notice how this behavior is present on all social networks and sjw)

More than anything, the Longhouse refers to the remarkable overcorrection of the last two generations toward social norms centering feminine needs and feminine methods for controlling, directing, and modeling behavior.

I have the impression that large groups of people tend to resemble the feminine, perhaps due to the fact that the father is always one to several mothers, so the mothers end up assuming this position of basing morals

And because they are overrepresented (women) in professions, such as human resource management (73 percent) and compliance officers (57 percent), that determine workplace behavioral norms, they have an outsized influence on professional culture

From early childhood onwards, girls compete using strategies that minimize the risk of retaliation and reduce the strength of other girls. Girls’ competitive strategies include avoiding direct interference with another girl’s goals, disguising competition, competing overtly only from a position of high status in the community, enforcing equality within the female community and socially excluding other girls.

Jonathan Haidt explains that privileging female strategies does not eliminate conflict. Rather it yields “a different kind of conflict. There is a greater emphasis on what someone said which hurt someone else, even if unintentionally. There is a greater tendency to respond to an offense by mobilizing social resources to ostracize the alleged offender.”

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the realm of free speech and the tenor of our public discourse where consensus and the prohibition on “offense” and “harm” take precedence over truth.

Longhouse morality tends to eliminate conflict altogether and lazily rather than fighting itself, often in a state of defeat or complete stupidity but in a way that does not offend the other, a theory as to why women drive badly is due to exaggeratedly "empathetic" behavior, such as braking traffic law to let a person pass and ending up causing an accident

Further, these speech norms are enforced through punitive measures typical of female-dominated groups––social isolation, reputational harm, indirect and hidden force. To be “canceled” is to feel the whip of the Longhouse masters

The emphasis on “feelings” is rooted in a deeper ideology of Safetyism. Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff, in their 2018 book The Coddling of the American Mind, define Safetyism as “a culture or belief system in which safety has become a sacred value, which means that people are unwilling to make trade-offs demanded by other practical and moral concerns.”

While Haidt and Lukianoff focus their analysis on proto-woke novelties like “trigger warnings” and “microaggressions,” the cult of Safetyism is best exemplified in our response to the pandemic. Think of the litany of violations of our basic rights to personal freedom and choice over the last two years that were justified on the basis of harm reduction

something like that

 

[Emba]

Very similar to "the 48 laws of power" by Robert Greene

Always with some super subtle meme shit instead of outright honest violence.

 

[highschoolcel]

Yes, but don’t forget the JEWS

 

[Mayocel]

I disagree on the community over individual part.
The modern problem is that the self is put above others at any cost.
The masses being low IQ is part human nature and part idiocracy where the being the loudest and most aggressive is rewarded, which is the opposite of how most really intelligent people act.
Women have less exceptionally intelligent individuals (they converge more heavily into the mean), which makes them more agreeable, and are more conformist by nature.

More traditional European cultures are focused on the family unit and the village, where the good of the community comes first and marriage is sanctified.

If we isolate the talking points of third wave feminism, we can see selfishness as the primary driver
, e.g. "fuck being a nurturer, you should live for yourself".

 

[Limitcel]

I disagree on the community over individual part.
The modern problem is that the self is put above others at any cost.
The masses being low IQ is part human nature and part idiocracy where the being the loudest and most aggressive is rewarded, which is the opposite of how most really intelligent people act.
Women have less exceptionally intelligent individuals (they converge more heavily into the mean), which makes them more agreeable, and are more conformist by nature.

More traditional European cultures are focused on the family unit and the village, where the good of the community comes first and marriage is sanctified.

If we isolate the talking points of third wave feminism, we can see selfishness as the primary driver
, e.g. "fuck being a nurturer, you should live for yourself".

I get it, but in this case they are different communities
The ancient community was formed by several families of patriarchs
The current one is amorphous, it is as if it were a mass that excretes everything that acts differently

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

cool find although I wouldn't compare a longhouse to modern soyciety

I disagree on the community over individual part.
The modern problem is that the self is put above others at any cost.
The masses being low IQ is part human nature and part idiocracy where the being the loudest and most aggressive is rewarded, which is the opposite of how most really intelligent people act.
Women have less exceptionally intelligent individuals (they converge more heavily into the mean), which makes them more agreeable, and are more conformist by nature.

More traditional European cultures are focused on the family unit and the village, where the good of the community comes first and marriage is sanctified.

If we isolate the talking points of third wave feminism, we can see selfishness as the primary driver
, e.g. "fuck being a nurturer, you should live for yourself".

community when it's time to cancel someone, individuality when it's time to help them