I just went to the search bar and searched for posts by @Logic55 and he literally only talks about race like he is obsessed
he's doing it for shits and giggles atp, jannies should be harsher on him
He blew up my profile last night
I think he had some good points in some of his threads when i first saw them but then i saw this is all he does. Not hating on him, just funny take it as a joke i hate nobody on here
Racelcels.is would just be currys and whitecels hating on each other lol based tho
That white supremacist incels cope with white supremacy as if 99% of their race doesn't hate them.
This guy clearly won the argument in the original thread imo (https://incels.is/threads/white-sup...are-a-problem-too.713085/page-2#post-16996377)
but this is next level glazing
You do realize most of us are not "supremacists" we're just against immigration & acknowledge race realism
No he has a point, I don't see how it's "glazing" jfl
I respect the dedication
It would be hilariousI can see this already, and by the love of fuck would I actively participate.
Inventing more stuff than another group of people doesn't mean they are superior. It's all about geography, access to resources, community efforts, and other environmental factors. If whites lived in the sub saharan Africa then creating advanced civilizations would not be possible. Using the logic of white Supremacists, Whites are not the superior race because they don't have the highest IQs in the world. Asians are the master race because they have highest IQs.
Genetics doesn't determine your intelligence. This is a basic fact that is rejected by ignorant race "realists".
When you say whites have better access to resources... enviromental factors etc and this is why they are "better" you admit that they are as a whole somewhat superior. I agree, if whites lived in sub saharan africa they would be at around the same advancement africans are today, they are not inherently superior in that regard. But they are racially superior on average, because their race has taller, healthier, and smarter people. This is genetic because of epigenetics. Not because the white race is superior because of their ethnicity. Asians have higher IQ but are not as tall, attractive on average. What do you think?
I am ethnic myself (mixed) and would always put my own race first, but this is just facts.
There is no scientific evidence that whites and Asians are smart because of their DNA. Asians have high iqs because of their culture. Whites were lucky because they lived in a continent where they can trade with other civilizations, has easy access to coal and iron, and they had plenty of fertile soil to grow food. All of these factors made advanced civilizations possible in Europe. Africa was cursed with shitty geography.
Regarding looks, I will admit that society views whites as more physically attractive. Imo, ethnics are better looking than whites. Again, this is my personal belief. I dont expect everyone else to have the same opinion as me.
Last edited:
No i agree i prefer my own race the most. But on average whites are seen as the most attractive race, though this is culturally since historically ethnics seemed to have disliked the appearnce of whites often. But IQ is genetic 100%. It is not determined by race, but when half of india is malnutritioned their offsprings iq will be lower than that of whites in europe who are healthy. Epigenetics man. Also when you said inventions dont mean the race is superior etc did you mean because of the post i linked? did you read my post? i said he is glazing, not that that argument was convincing in particular.
Similar threads
bcroger
Users who are viewing this thread
