The original theory is called "LMS", acronym for Looks, Money and Status.
Obviously it fails to explain why blind foids prefer Chads, since they can't even see him, so his looks become irrelevant.
It also fails to account for the first 2 million years of human evolution before money was even invented, which happened a few thousand years ago.
It also falls short of explaining why both criminals (low-status scum) and policemen ("society's paladins", high-status) are similarly supplied with pussy; or why enemy invaders ("scourge of the earth", vilified and low status) are sexually sought-after as much as a society's own domestic military ("defenders of civilization", high-status).
Therefore we must either reject or improve the original theory.
From what we all understand of foidish behavior, they are driven towards a triple pursuit:
1--- sperm from Alphas (Chads)
2--- resources from betas (betabuxxer cucks)
3--- avoidance of all responsibility by offloading it on omega males instead (social repercussions for their own actions, shame, moral bankruptcy, etc. if anyone brings any of it up the foid will acuse her critic of being an "incel", that is: she is offloading the responsibility for her own failings onto omega males, stirring up soyciety's hatred for omegas , everyone's favorite scapegoat.).
This is the use foids have had for males, alpha, beta and omega, for millions of years.
It is evident that, today, a foid would seek good looking dudes (1) to inseminate her womb wantonly and with extreme abandon (anonymous hookups in bathrooms being an especially common way to make babies nowadays); then a foid would get "tired" from "playing games" and ask for a "real man" to "step up", that is, a betabuxx with resources (2) in the form of money. They also demand not to be shunned, socially shamed, or reproached for any of their actions (prostitution, single motherhood, pornography, infanticide, lewdness, extremely destructive political views, acquisition and spreading of STDs, being a burden on soyciety by leeching off welfare etc. etc.). -- that is, foids demand a high-status, to remain above any criticism -- her critics are branded "incels", that is: omega males -- against whom she implies all social reproach should be directed instead.
It seems that Looks, Money, and Status fit the above equation. It does, but it is not the whole picture.
A blind cavewoman in the middle of a tribal warfare in the permafrost steppes of central asia a hundred thousand years ago, for instance, would not drive their decisions by considerations about money, which had not been invented back then; nor by the upholding of politically correct opinions, since politics was the purview of the chieftains and elders alone; much less by looks, since she can't even see. What would be the equivalent to LMS for this scenario?
I propose that by "LOOKS" we consider "GENES", which is also signalled by being NT, muscular, tall, healthy, having good skin, smelling nice, having long hair etc. Hair, for instance, is a proxy for male age, and paternal age increases the number of birth defects, therefore foids would prefer semen from an younger mate all else considered. Also, non-NT males are universally reviled by foids to the point that autists have 1/5th of the mean fertility ratio, despite having a higher sex-drive. It can't be that >80% of autists are genetic dead-ends because they were born deformed truecel abominations. What happens instead is that foids are not breeding with normal-looking autists because autism itself is a sign of high mutational load, a characteristic that foids would rather avoid.
I propose that by "MONEY" we consider "RESOURCES" in general: money, but also willingness to do labor, time to listen to her foidspeeches, and things such as comfort, leisure time etc. and especially food -- it is no coincidence that the ritual of betabuxxers "dating" mostly involves taking a foid to enjoy good food.
Even among high-earning foids, only 6% of them save for retirement, an evidence that foids don't care about money or net worth in itself. To foids, money is only ever a means to enjoy resources such as food, comfort, leisure time etc. That is: money is a placeholder for resources she would enjoy, but also time and energy of males to make her comfortable and pampered, so she can avoid exerting herself. Long hairs and nails, especially if polished and painted, are a symbol of idleness. Hardworking foids would keep nails short, and hair out of the way. Foids universally enjoy wasting money on salons to perform ostentatious ornamentations on their keratinized tissues as symbols of her idleness, because an idle foid is more fertile and tends to make healthier babies than a foid who does back-breaking hard labor. Also, it is a fact that foids prefer (for betabuxx purposes) males who are generous with his time, money, energy, who are "good listeners", who are helpful and do trivial things for her, like changing lightbulbs (something any non-paralytic retard can do), answers his messages quickly etc. These "simping" behaviors are signifiers that a male is willing to part with more than his money for the enjoyment of m'lady --- he is also submitting to her as a personal slave, a butler, a person whose time mean nothing if not in service of m'lady. Stingy men are unwanted as betabuxxers, while men who cut her grass for free are kept as orbiter pets. Foids are not looking after money, after all, but after the time and energy and psychological submission of the man being used to provide her with comfort and material resources.
I propose that by "STATUS" we consider "SECURITY", that is: the ability of the man to make a foid feel protected from risk. We can readily notice that foids are attracted to males on the top of any hierarchy: policeman and criminals, both are desired by many foids; likewise foreign invaders and the domestic military are equally showered with pussy; also are loyalist g-men and terrorist dissidents of the regime. All those pairs of men are in opposite sides of any status hierarchy, but foids seek both. What they both have in common is that all of them are skilled violence-users who are perceived to be able to protect a foid in case shit hits the fan.
We also observe frequently men who put foids through risky situations (criminals, but also rebels, adventure sportsmen, such as climbers, hikers, etc., motorcycle riders etc.). These men become desirable because a foid's primitive brain doesn't register the fact that the risk was introduced by the man, it only registers the fact that the man was by her side when she survived it, and therefore she "credits" her survival to him, he becomes her "protector", having had saved her from a risk he, in fact, created. We also see that foids often stay with men who beat her -- her tiny primitive brain doesn't register the beating received as an existential threat, but instead focuses on the fact that a violent thug desires her body, therefore he could protect her in an adverse situation --- paradoxically, a woman feels more protected with a wife-beater than with a wimp. The "status" that foids seek is therefore not found on any social hierarchy, but it is status as a potentially violent and resourceful man who could protect her if and when it becomes the case.
TL;DR: I hereby propose the LMS theory should be better called GRS - genes, resources, security.
Obviously it fails to explain why blind foids prefer Chads, since they can't even see him, so his looks become irrelevant.
It also fails to account for the first 2 million years of human evolution before money was even invented, which happened a few thousand years ago.
It also falls short of explaining why both criminals (low-status scum) and policemen ("society's paladins", high-status) are similarly supplied with pussy; or why enemy invaders ("scourge of the earth", vilified and low status) are sexually sought-after as much as a society's own domestic military ("defenders of civilization", high-status).
Therefore we must either reject or improve the original theory.
From what we all understand of foidish behavior, they are driven towards a triple pursuit:
1--- sperm from Alphas (Chads)
2--- resources from betas (betabuxxer cucks)
3--- avoidance of all responsibility by offloading it on omega males instead (social repercussions for their own actions, shame, moral bankruptcy, etc. if anyone brings any of it up the foid will acuse her critic of being an "incel", that is: she is offloading the responsibility for her own failings onto omega males, stirring up soyciety's hatred for omegas , everyone's favorite scapegoat.).
This is the use foids have had for males, alpha, beta and omega, for millions of years.
It is evident that, today, a foid would seek good looking dudes (1) to inseminate her womb wantonly and with extreme abandon (anonymous hookups in bathrooms being an especially common way to make babies nowadays); then a foid would get "tired" from "playing games" and ask for a "real man" to "step up", that is, a betabuxx with resources (2) in the form of money. They also demand not to be shunned, socially shamed, or reproached for any of their actions (prostitution, single motherhood, pornography, infanticide, lewdness, extremely destructive political views, acquisition and spreading of STDs, being a burden on soyciety by leeching off welfare etc. etc.). -- that is, foids demand a high-status, to remain above any criticism -- her critics are branded "incels", that is: omega males -- against whom she implies all social reproach should be directed instead.
To be clear since we're in an incel forum, when a foid says: "you dislike my infanticidal and pornographic lifestyle because you're an incel", what a foid is really saying is this: "instead of reproaching me, you should offload your frustrations by bullying an omega male, and if you fail to obey this directive, I shall label you as an omega male too.
It seems that Looks, Money, and Status fit the above equation. It does, but it is not the whole picture.
A blind cavewoman in the middle of a tribal warfare in the permafrost steppes of central asia a hundred thousand years ago, for instance, would not drive their decisions by considerations about money, which had not been invented back then; nor by the upholding of politically correct opinions, since politics was the purview of the chieftains and elders alone; much less by looks, since she can't even see. What would be the equivalent to LMS for this scenario?
I propose that by "LOOKS" we consider "GENES", which is also signalled by being NT, muscular, tall, healthy, having good skin, smelling nice, having long hair etc. Hair, for instance, is a proxy for male age, and paternal age increases the number of birth defects, therefore foids would prefer semen from an younger mate all else considered. Also, non-NT males are universally reviled by foids to the point that autists have 1/5th of the mean fertility ratio, despite having a higher sex-drive. It can't be that >80% of autists are genetic dead-ends because they were born deformed truecel abominations. What happens instead is that foids are not breeding with normal-looking autists because autism itself is a sign of high mutational load, a characteristic that foids would rather avoid.
I propose that by "MONEY" we consider "RESOURCES" in general: money, but also willingness to do labor, time to listen to her foidspeeches, and things such as comfort, leisure time etc. and especially food -- it is no coincidence that the ritual of betabuxxers "dating" mostly involves taking a foid to enjoy good food.
Even among high-earning foids, only 6% of them save for retirement, an evidence that foids don't care about money or net worth in itself. To foids, money is only ever a means to enjoy resources such as food, comfort, leisure time etc. That is: money is a placeholder for resources she would enjoy, but also time and energy of males to make her comfortable and pampered, so she can avoid exerting herself. Long hairs and nails, especially if polished and painted, are a symbol of idleness. Hardworking foids would keep nails short, and hair out of the way. Foids universally enjoy wasting money on salons to perform ostentatious ornamentations on their keratinized tissues as symbols of her idleness, because an idle foid is more fertile and tends to make healthier babies than a foid who does back-breaking hard labor. Also, it is a fact that foids prefer (for betabuxx purposes) males who are generous with his time, money, energy, who are "good listeners", who are helpful and do trivial things for her, like changing lightbulbs (something any non-paralytic retard can do), answers his messages quickly etc. These "simping" behaviors are signifiers that a male is willing to part with more than his money for the enjoyment of m'lady --- he is also submitting to her as a personal slave, a butler, a person whose time mean nothing if not in service of m'lady. Stingy men are unwanted as betabuxxers, while men who cut her grass for free are kept as orbiter pets. Foids are not looking after money, after all, but after the time and energy and psychological submission of the man being used to provide her with comfort and material resources.
I propose that by "STATUS" we consider "SECURITY", that is: the ability of the man to make a foid feel protected from risk. We can readily notice that foids are attracted to males on the top of any hierarchy: policeman and criminals, both are desired by many foids; likewise foreign invaders and the domestic military are equally showered with pussy; also are loyalist g-men and terrorist dissidents of the regime. All those pairs of men are in opposite sides of any status hierarchy, but foids seek both. What they both have in common is that all of them are skilled violence-users who are perceived to be able to protect a foid in case shit hits the fan.
We also observe frequently men who put foids through risky situations (criminals, but also rebels, adventure sportsmen, such as climbers, hikers, etc., motorcycle riders etc.). These men become desirable because a foid's primitive brain doesn't register the fact that the risk was introduced by the man, it only registers the fact that the man was by her side when she survived it, and therefore she "credits" her survival to him, he becomes her "protector", having had saved her from a risk he, in fact, created. We also see that foids often stay with men who beat her -- her tiny primitive brain doesn't register the beating received as an existential threat, but instead focuses on the fact that a violent thug desires her body, therefore he could protect her in an adverse situation --- paradoxically, a woman feels more protected with a wife-beater than with a wimp. The "status" that foids seek is therefore not found on any social hierarchy, but it is status as a potentially violent and resourceful man who could protect her if and when it becomes the case.
TL;DR: I hereby propose the LMS theory should be better called GRS - genes, resources, security.
Send the message to FaceAndLMS to update his channel to FaceAndGRS 
Thanks to all who took time to read my blackpills.
Thanks to all who took time to read my blackpills.
Last edited:
