I used my highschool classmates as reference. I excluded people I didnt know enough about.
In this first graph, I compare looks (y-axis) with dating success (x-axis). The looks rating was subjective 60% looks, 30% height, 10% physique. For the dating success rating I did the following: Total-Weeks-Dated × (1 + 0.15×Foids-Dated) /220.
Then in this second graph, I compare perSOYnality (y-axis) with dating success (x-axis). Personality was: 20% intelligence, 20% emotional intelligence, 20% fun, 20 hardworking and 20% extroversion with this results:
I did not do any regression lines or anything but I think we can clearly see that personality is bullshit and looks is everything. The average personality of a virgin was 6.46 vs 6.6 for sex-havers. Meanwhile, the average looks of a virgin was 3.4125 vs 7.65 for a sex-haver.
In this first graph, I compare looks (y-axis) with dating success (x-axis). The looks rating was subjective 60% looks, 30% height, 10% physique. For the dating success rating I did the following: Total-Weeks-Dated × (1 + 0.15×Foids-Dated) /220.
Then in this second graph, I compare perSOYnality (y-axis) with dating success (x-axis). Personality was: 20% intelligence, 20% emotional intelligence, 20% fun, 20 hardworking and 20% extroversion with this results:
I did not do any regression lines or anything but I think we can clearly see that personality is bullshit and looks is everything. The average personality of a virgin was 6.46 vs 6.6 for sex-havers. Meanwhile, the average looks of a virgin was 3.4125 vs 7.65 for a sex-haver.
