Theory Life is based on cruelty

[Damkiller]

<I have no idea with category, is correct please don't punish me>
When you think about even simple things like food, it is always killing living thing, in order to survive. In order to win, the others have to suffer. The fundamental nature of competition, is the same. The best gets most rewards while the worst get none. In order to win, you have to make people lose.Competition is not fair to us, but fair in the rules. How good or bad we are, is only relative to your enviorment and relative vaules do you have. Competition is everywhere fundamentaly, IQ tests, dating, job hunting, and even in people. Good and bad person cannot exist without competition. Because it is all about comparing a set of people, and a set of vaules and selecting based on relative score the good or the bad, better and worse. And because fundamentaly it must exist, here are always losers and winners.

 

[Jud Pottah]

inmendham

Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

www.youtube.com

 

[Damkiller]

inmendham

Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

www.youtube.com

I have no idea what this supposed to even mean

 

[Ubermenschvirtues]

High IQ post i agree with eveything you said.
Wise men decide to not participate in that play.

 

[Jud Pottah]

I have no idea what this supposed to even mean

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQIiUNHRINQ&pp=ygUWaW5tZW1kaGFtIGFudGluYXRhbGlzbQ%3D%3D

 

[Ubermenschvirtues]

Normies are too stupid to realize that in order to live someone gotta suffer or die.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Life truly is a zero-sum game at its core. One’s gain is often someone else’s loss, and competition pervades every facet of existence.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

<I have no idea with category, is correct please don't punish me>
When you think about even simple things like food, it is always killing living thing, in order to survive. In order to win, the others have to suffer. The fundamental nature of competition, is the same. The best gets most rewards while the worst get none. In order to win, you have to make people lose.Competition is not fair to us, but fair in the rules. How good or bad we are, is only relative to your enviorment and relative vaules do you have. Competition is everywhere fundamentaly, IQ tests, dating, job hunting, and even in people. Good and bad person cannot exist without competition. Because it is all about comparing a set of people, and a set of vaules and selecting based on relative score the good or the bad, better and worse. And because fundamentaly it must exist, here are always losers and winners.

Life truly is a zero-sum game at its core. One’s gain is often someone else’s loss, and competition pervades every facet of existence.

Meh. Cooperation is the winning move when it comes to large picture stuff. Individuals vs tribes. Tribes vs Nations. The bigger cooperative unit wins. Even your body is a cooperative effort.

In a sense, men are suffering because we are not part of the winning cooperative meta-organism of our society (wokeness, identity-politics). And that is, at least in part, the fault of men themselves lacking cooperative instincts. If we were a functional interest group, we would stomp the female collective into the ground when it comes to social, financial and political capital.

 

[Ghostface]

I have no idea what this supposed to even mean

grAY moment

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Meh. Cooperation is the winning move when it comes to large picture stuff. Individuals vs tribes. Tribes vs Nations. The bigger cooperative unit wins. Even your body is a cooperative effort.

In a sense, men are suffering because we are not part of the winning cooperative meta-organism of our society (wokeness, identity-politics). And that is, at least in part, the fault of men themselves lacking cooperative instincts. If we were a functional interest group, we would stomp the female collective into the ground when it comes to social, financial and political capital.

I definitely agree with that, and it doesn't necessarily contradict what I originally said. Cooperating to achieve shared goals, albeit in a slightly different way, still leads to a win for some and a loss for others; in the context of men like us, if we cooperate we could "win" and better our own situation, but that would lead to a loss for women and chads.

Regardless, my first statement was just an oversimplification of how I perceive society. Of course not everything is a zero-sum game since there are win-win scenarios in life, but I do believe that in most important aspects of life—for there to be winners there must be losers.