For radical and violent movements, I would be tempted to say all of them. I think that you can definitely frame ISIS, for example, that way, and surely other radical religious movements too. At a certain level of abstraction, I would guess that the vast majority of violent social upheaval has been caused by young/prime-aged men finding themselves unable to rise to the positions expected of them in society, to fulfill whatever their culture regards as the proper function of men, to attain an acceptable degree of social status, and/or to procreate. Generally people are motivated by tangible, immediate and existential things like that.
To look at mass murderers rather than mass movements, I wonder how many recent mass shootings were committed by men with a loving wife with whom he had a stable, fulfilling relationship? I would guess zero, but am happy to be corrected.
