I
Incel_Because_Short
Veteran
★
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2017
- Posts
- 1,085
I always saw threads or comments on incel communities on Islam and how it would be better for incels.
Telling you right now, that's not true.
First off, hypergamy is built in:
If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.
— Qur'an, Sura 4 (An-Nisa), Ayah 3[1]
Right away, allowing a man to have more than one wife means that there's a very likely chance that not every man in a society will marry.
This seems to be intentional, as it would then create a surplus of unmarried men who can be utilized for warfare or expansion. Historically, Islamic civilization did its best when it waged successful wars. The pent up sexual frustration was channeled into military strength, and as long as the Islamic state kept expanding, the problem could be avoided through conquest.
Likewise, when Islamic civilization settled down and did not expand it deteriorated very, VERY quickly. Why? Because now all the sexual frustration cannot be channeled anywhere so it ended up damaging the societies. When the Sultan and all of his council have four wives and 100 concubines each and war end up in stalemate, guess how many single males are left with no purpose and left to do whatever without having a chance of raising a family?
It happened in virtually every Islamic empire, from the Umayyad to the Abbasid to the late Ottoman empire. It always started with successful conquests, then a stalemate, then very quickly those societies slipped into decay. Homosexuality began to be common, wine was consumed and cities that were peaceful before turned into streets of crime and violence. Almost like clockwork.
Islam's solution for incels? Just fast bro.
Here:
The first hadeeth was narrated by al-Bukhaari (5066) and Muslim (1400) from Ibn Mas‘ood, who said: We were with the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), young men who had nothing of wealth. The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said to us: “O young men, whoever among you can afford it, let him get married, for it is more effective in lowering the gaze and guarding one’s chastity. And whoever cannot afford it should fast, for it will be a shield for him.”
When you create a society that carries within it the conditions that result in potentially 75% of men not having a chance at having a family, yet your only response is, "Just don't eat bro", don't be surprised when a lot of men end up checking out and either being violent (as you see in the Middle East today) or just doing the bare minimum necessary to survive.
Telling you right now, that's not true.
First off, hypergamy is built in:
If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.
— Qur'an, Sura 4 (An-Nisa), Ayah 3[1]
Right away, allowing a man to have more than one wife means that there's a very likely chance that not every man in a society will marry.
This seems to be intentional, as it would then create a surplus of unmarried men who can be utilized for warfare or expansion. Historically, Islamic civilization did its best when it waged successful wars. The pent up sexual frustration was channeled into military strength, and as long as the Islamic state kept expanding, the problem could be avoided through conquest.
Likewise, when Islamic civilization settled down and did not expand it deteriorated very, VERY quickly. Why? Because now all the sexual frustration cannot be channeled anywhere so it ended up damaging the societies. When the Sultan and all of his council have four wives and 100 concubines each and war end up in stalemate, guess how many single males are left with no purpose and left to do whatever without having a chance of raising a family?
It happened in virtually every Islamic empire, from the Umayyad to the Abbasid to the late Ottoman empire. It always started with successful conquests, then a stalemate, then very quickly those societies slipped into decay. Homosexuality began to be common, wine was consumed and cities that were peaceful before turned into streets of crime and violence. Almost like clockwork.
Islam's solution for incels? Just fast bro.
Here:
The first hadeeth was narrated by al-Bukhaari (5066) and Muslim (1400) from Ibn Mas‘ood, who said: We were with the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), young men who had nothing of wealth. The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said to us: “O young men, whoever among you can afford it, let him get married, for it is more effective in lowering the gaze and guarding one’s chastity. And whoever cannot afford it should fast, for it will be a shield for him.”
When you create a society that carries within it the conditions that result in potentially 75% of men not having a chance at having a family, yet your only response is, "Just don't eat bro", don't be surprised when a lot of men end up checking out and either being violent (as you see in the Middle East today) or just doing the bare minimum necessary to survive.