Well, it's almost over, and watching some of this legal proceeding has been somewhat of a learning experience about the nature of civil trail law for Hollywood personalities set in a very un-Hollywood courtroom location of Northern Virginia.
I'm not really discussing long and arduous legal proceedings in the OP but it's interesting to see the various counselor's arguments play out in front of a Fairfax jury. Feel free to offer detailed comments on those proceedings if you wish.
What's worth stating here is that what seems to be a peak into the individual and personal lives of chadlite-Depp's & stacy-Heard's marriage, is actually just an account of cultural malfunction for the "showbiz" variety. We saw the Brian Laundry/Gabby Petito story play out as the cultural malfunction bubbling up to the surface pertaining to the normies variety.
One would think that the sacred privacy of a courtroom should mean journalists aren't able to help to make stars out of litigators, but that's never possible in 2022. In the end it's easy to see just how unstable Western culture has become and how we are all, in some way or the other, a part of it. If you felt you really understood any part of this trial relatively well, then it means you are or were also a part the Western cultural story. The recordings we hear, the nasty things they say to one another, we can see many of those same nasty things being said across every scale of internet and in-real-life interactions.
Some less important (but still relevant) questions as a side bar:
Heard's legal foid: [UWSL]Eliane Bredehoft[/UWSL]
Has she done a good job so far? Are we (or the Jury/Judge) going to be biased because she looks like an old uglier lady?
Depp's legal foid: Ca[UWSL]milla Vasquez[/UWSL]
[UWSL]Has she done a good job so far? Are we (or the Jury/Judge) going to be biased because she looks like a pretty foid? [/UWSL]
[UWSL]My general impression is that Camille Vasquez is the more effective litigator. And due to the various experts and whitenesses it appears to be over for Amber Heard. But it's always hard to predict how the jury perceived the trial until they render their opinion, and if course we come with a whole lot of our outside knowledge which (hopefully) they are privy to. [/UWSL]
I'm not really discussing long and arduous legal proceedings in the OP but it's interesting to see the various counselor's arguments play out in front of a Fairfax jury. Feel free to offer detailed comments on those proceedings if you wish.
What's worth stating here is that what seems to be a peak into the individual and personal lives of chadlite-Depp's & stacy-Heard's marriage, is actually just an account of cultural malfunction for the "showbiz" variety. We saw the Brian Laundry/Gabby Petito story play out as the cultural malfunction bubbling up to the surface pertaining to the normies variety.
One would think that the sacred privacy of a courtroom should mean journalists aren't able to help to make stars out of litigators, but that's never possible in 2022. In the end it's easy to see just how unstable Western culture has become and how we are all, in some way or the other, a part of it. If you felt you really understood any part of this trial relatively well, then it means you are or were also a part the Western cultural story. The recordings we hear, the nasty things they say to one another, we can see many of those same nasty things being said across every scale of internet and in-real-life interactions.
Some less important (but still relevant) questions as a side bar:
Heard's legal foid: [UWSL]Eliane Bredehoft[/UWSL]
Has she done a good job so far? Are we (or the Jury/Judge) going to be biased because she looks like an old uglier lady?
Depp's legal foid: Ca[UWSL]milla Vasquez[/UWSL]
[UWSL]Has she done a good job so far? Are we (or the Jury/Judge) going to be biased because she looks like a pretty foid? [/UWSL]
[UWSL]My general impression is that Camille Vasquez is the more effective litigator. And due to the various experts and whitenesses it appears to be over for Amber Heard. But it's always hard to predict how the jury perceived the trial until they render their opinion, and if course we come with a whole lot of our outside knowledge which (hopefully) they are privy to. [/UWSL]
Last edited:
