Akhnai
Christian Incel
-
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2019
- Posts
- 1,321
"If incels are so desperate for sex,why dont they simply fuck each other?"
"If the peasants are so desperate for food,why dont they simply eat grass and leaves?"
"If blacks are so desperate to have equal representations,why dont they simply fuck off to Africa where blacks are represented in the every part of the goverment?"
Leftists would thoroughly support the first statement,but not the other two.
Why?
Because telling peasants to eat grass and deporting blacks to Africa are not effective measures.
Sure the former might reduce starvation among the peasants and the latter will technically give American blacks equal rights,but the core problems still remain:
That there is an unjust,institutionalized and opressive system that keeps peasant hungry and marginalized blacks.
It is this system that caused hunger and segregation in the first place.
The leftists will say that we must destroy this opressive system so that all men can have equal rights.
But why wont the leftists renounce the first statement,even though it has the same vein as the other two?
Why do they keep pushing homosexuality as a way to silence sexual starvation instead of destroying the opressive system that caused said starvation in the first place?
Let me make this clear,leftists.
There is an unjust caste system propped up by women that marginalized men simply because of their genetic traits.It is this caste system that keeps so many incels sexually starving.
And telling men to be homosexual is insulting and retarded.
While fucking homos might reduce the severity of sexual opression experienced by incels;it wont destroy the opressive caste system set upon by foids.
In contrary,homosexuality will enable the caste system,because a huge amount of homosexuals are passive and passive men wont revolt against women.
"If the peasants are so desperate for food,why dont they simply eat grass and leaves?"
"If blacks are so desperate to have equal representations,why dont they simply fuck off to Africa where blacks are represented in the every part of the goverment?"
Leftists would thoroughly support the first statement,but not the other two.
Why?
Because telling peasants to eat grass and deporting blacks to Africa are not effective measures.
Sure the former might reduce starvation among the peasants and the latter will technically give American blacks equal rights,but the core problems still remain:
That there is an unjust,institutionalized and opressive system that keeps peasant hungry and marginalized blacks.
It is this system that caused hunger and segregation in the first place.
The leftists will say that we must destroy this opressive system so that all men can have equal rights.
But why wont the leftists renounce the first statement,even though it has the same vein as the other two?
Why do they keep pushing homosexuality as a way to silence sexual starvation instead of destroying the opressive system that caused said starvation in the first place?
Let me make this clear,leftists.
There is an unjust caste system propped up by women that marginalized men simply because of their genetic traits.It is this caste system that keeps so many incels sexually starving.
And telling men to be homosexual is insulting and retarded.
While fucking homos might reduce the severity of sexual opression experienced by incels;it wont destroy the opressive caste system set upon by foids.
In contrary,homosexuality will enable the caste system,because a huge amount of homosexuals are passive and passive men wont revolt against women.
Last edited: