Hypocrisy Leftists are always bitching about economic inequality, but they never address the issue of inequality in the sexual market?

[wizardcel]

That's the epitome of hypocrisy. Leftists come up with whole theories to explain why some groups of people do better than others. According to them, the reasons for the economic disparity among the social classes are oppression and privilege. Aren't ugly men oppressed? after all we live in a world which values looks above everything else and men are not immune to the chastisement of lookism. In reality, men are more deeply affected by looks than women. It doesn't matter how ugly a woman is; she can get laid at any time. Men don't enjoy the same benefit; it's impossible to find a girlfriend if you're not attractive.

Cucks will say that I should refrain from complaining about it because a lack of sex is not fatally hazardous to my health. I beg to differ. A lifetime without sex, love and companionship hurt your mental well being. The correlation between your mental state with your physical health has already been proven by medicine. I think it's about time society started talking about inequality in the sexual market.

I get it that you can't force women to be with you. But why can't we have affordable legal prostitution? why can't we have our sexbots? why can't women stop shaming men for being short, fat and bald? I think I'm advocating for fair and reasonable things.

 

[Rassimov]

What would be welcome is another sexual revolution of a maoist type to bring down hypergamy levels.

 

[Deleted member 14218]

YOU AREN'T ENTITLED TO RELATIONSHIPS INKWELL

 

[Fiddlesticks03]

Considering the 08 crash caused by Bush caused the tripling in sexlessness, it's a bit weird to blame leftists, however horrible they are nowadays
Economic insecurity and a gap btw income and cost-of-living-independently causes inceldom in wealthy countries, for obvious reasons. Poverty doesn't improve inceldom unless the entire country is third-world-level poor.

 

[ElliotRodgerGod]

Considering the 08 crash caused by Bush caused the tripling in sexlessness, it's a bit weird to blame leftists, however horrible they are nowadays
Economic insecurity causes inceldom in wealthy countries. Poverty doesn't improve inceldom unless the country is third-world-level poor.

Cope, inceldom directly rose as a result of feminism and the growth of smartphone technology allowing foids to have easy access to Chad.

 

[Fiddlesticks03]

Cope, inceldom directly rose as a result of feminism and the growth of smartphone technology allowing foids to have easy access to Chad.

We have always had inceldom and while feminist did probably accellerate it, so did the 08 crash. But we all already agree on feminism, and the Republicans call for a nuclear family + female sexual freedom (sans abortion) is somehow worse than destroying the nuclear family with female sexual freedom.

 

[Deleted member 19756]

Considering the 08 crash caused by Bush caused the tripling in sexlessness, it's a bit weird to blame leftists, however horrible they are nowadays
Economic insecurity and a gap btw income and cost-of-living-independently causes inceldom in wealthy countries, for obvious reasons. Poverty doesn't improve inceldom unless the entire country is third-world-level poor.

Leftists created female economic emancipation, so it's more than fair enough to blame them. A man has to make double what a woman does to have economic value. Most women don't find average men attractive. Economic value was their only hope.

We have always had inceldom and while feminist did probably accellerate it, so did the 08 crash. But we all already agree on feminism, and the Republicans call for a nuclear family + female sexual freedom is somehow worse than destroying the nuclear family with female sexual freedom.

View attachment 158328

What's funny is the graph shows both men and women have more sex during tough financial times. I can't wait for the next recession, I may ascend. JFL.

 

[Fiddlesticks03]

Leftists created female economic emancipation

Womens economic "liberation" did not occur in the 60s. While their were some Stalinist feminists in the early 20th century, the first female suffragetes were elite, bougie pseudo-capitalists like Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Early feminism was almost exclusively educated elite women who defended property rights.

"What's funny is the graph shows both men and women have more sex during tough financial times. I can't wait for the next recession, I may ascend. JFL. "

No that's not what that graph says. It says there was the least inceldom prior to 2008. The crash started in 08, exactly when inceldom started to triple. Social media and smartphones existed before 2008, although they did play a role.

Here's a right-winger agreeing that the inceldom thing nowadays is hugely influenced by economic conditions

 

[TaskManagerDust]

It's just a fact that men are generally more sexually driven than most women. This inevitably leads to men predominantly buying sex, nudes, porn, and attention, from sluts on the internet and in real life. From what I've collected, when women buy sexual things from men (like male strippers), it's for fun, and not for pleasure. A female privilege if you ask me.

I mean, I guess you could say that each of the sexes just buy what they "need." For example, Roasties purchase labor from big stronk males. So, incels will keep buying sexual favors.

 

[Deleted member 19756]

Womens economic "liberation" did not occur in the 60s. While their were some Stalinist feminists in the early 20th century, the first female suffragetes were elite, bougie pseudo-capitalists like Elizabeth Cady Stanton
"What's funny is the graph shows both men and women have more sex during tough financial times. I can't wait for the next recession, I may ascend. JFL. "

No that's not what that graph says.

Why did more people have sex in 2008 then? Do you need the exact numbers by year for women's labor force participation and college degree attainment? The pill, abortion, and no fault divorce were also instrumental in female liberation.

There have been varying degrees of a feminist movements in America since the founding of the country. What does that have to do with modern day feminism? Young women should have less freedoms than ever considering young men outnumber them substantially. It's just a matter of time before the old hippy dykes die off.

 

[Fiddlesticks03]

Why did more people have sex in 2008 then? Do you need the exact numbers by year for women's labor force participation and college degree attainment? The pill, abortion, and no fault divorce were also instrumental in female liberation.

There have been varying degrees of a feminist movements in America since the founding of the country. What does that have to do with modern day feminism? Young women should have less freedoms than ever considering young men outnumber them substantially. It's just a matter of time before the old hippy dykes die off.

Why did the Occupy movement happen 4-6 years after the crash? Why did the society-wide complaints about economic inequality only start in 2014? According to your logic that all should have had to happened in 2008. It takes a few years to go through the bankruptcy process, lose your home, lose your wife, lose your job. Then for a post-crash society to be built on austerity and for people to realise this is a long term thing with growing wealth inequality and for the reality of the situation to hit psychologically. Economic insecurity is a psychological thing as far as inceldom. Women factor *long term* economic security (compared to previous expectations) moreso than anything into their mating decisions. And one year of bad economic conditions doesn't prove to women it's all over RE: men.
I don't deny feminism and the pill etc play a role.

You brought up early feminism so I responded about early feminism. Early feminists were (mostly) bougies who defended property owners.

I'll have tucker carlson explain it, if you don't trust lefties

 

[Deleted member 19756]

Another feel-good market is booming instead: the market for personal lubricants and sex toys.
Market research in 2009 found that sales of lubricants and sexual-enhancement devices were rocketing in the recession.

Occupy happened in September 2011. It was probably a precursor to BLM and Antifa. All those leftist movements are driven by virtue signaling. The more scarce women become the more some men will engage in tribal like raiding behavior.

 

[Fiddlesticks03]

Occupy happened in September 2011. It was probably a precursor to BLM and Antifa. All those leftist movements are driven by virtue signaling. The more scarce women become the more some men will engage in tribal like raiding behavior.

I'll explain it this way

2007-2008

Boyfriend: "Massive stock crash"

Girlfriend: "Dan, I'm leaving you!"

^doesn't happen like that


What happens is


2007-2008:

News: "Massive stock crash"

Girlfriend: "wow"

2009:

Boyfriend: *loses job*

Girlfriend: "Boy I hope this isn't permanent" (evaluates long-term situation)

2010:

Boyfriend: *still without job, moves in with parents*

Girlfriend: "I'm not really that into you anymore*

2011-2015:

Boyfriend: *Can't find anything except crappy work,

Girlfriend: "You're not the man I thought you were", leaves

[/QUOTE]



We are *still* feeling increased effects from the crash as you can see in the chart above.


Believe it or not, reducing economic insecurity and improving the basic material conditions of men promotes societal cohesion, gets people out of their house, and gets people to mate. And while obviously taking away women's rights (could) solve inceldom, it's much easier just to not let Republicans (and Democrats) keep men from having the most basic material security. There's only one person in the race proposing a housing-for-all program. And it's not a Republican.

 

[Deleted member 4159]

According to them, the reasons for the economic disparity among the social classes are oppression and privilege.

Tall and good looking people make more money. Bluepillers always disprove themselves with their own arguments.

 

[Narazz]

I still live at my folk's place. it sucks but i think life would be much more slave oriented having to work two to three jobs, which even crappy jobs incels have a hard time getting. having nothing to come home to or time to play video games would drive me nuts.