A
On the left we have liberal feminists, who identify with communist ideology. On the right, we have gynocentric tradcons (there is a difference between gyno tradcons and patriarchal tradcons), feminism grew from gynocentric traditionalism. Which is basically, covert feminism, same equality + chivalry nonsense. Not many people seem to realize that the suffragist movement predates feminism, it was "traditional" women who did this. So it's basically right wing and left wing feminism. Right wing feminists have basically hijacked much of the MRM, ironically in the name of "men's rights."
Then you have the "centrists," whom are also gynocentric, they are quite dogmatic to their perception of being "egalitarian," but what you will find with them is they white knight a thousand times harder for women than they will for men, most of them are barely if at all even aware of men's issues, at best they say they care to virtue signal and pretend to be objective, but, they will often white knight in a flash over any PERCEIVED women's issues. I see a lot of this among "truthers" too... (I guess I am a truther myself, I'm an anarcho-patriarch and I investigate the occult, freemasons, etc, but that's another topic-- one thing I am not is a gynocentric white knight).
Then you have the "centrists," whom are also gynocentric, they are quite dogmatic to their perception of being "egalitarian," but what you will find with them is they white knight a thousand times harder for women than they will for men, most of them are barely if at all even aware of men's issues, at best they say they care to virtue signal and pretend to be objective, but, they will often white knight in a flash over any PERCEIVED women's issues. I see a lot of this among "truthers" too... (I guess I am a truther myself, I'm an anarcho-patriarch and I investigate the occult, freemasons, etc, but that's another topic-- one thing I am not is a gynocentric white knight).
