some universall laws of logic:
|A|:
if u want to convince someone to belive a lie, its better to use cherrypicking, because:
if u dont:
it means u try to proove something with at least one false argument. And for them to appeal as true arguments, you need to invent new lies and so on and on and at some point there wont be enought details to lie about, causing a contradiction
|B|:
from |A| we know that in discussions, you should proove something with real arguments, not convincening statements, cuz it could cause later on a contradiction
|C|:
one thing can have severall causes, make sure to use |D| RULE to make sure its specifically those few or only one cause you belive it is
|D|:
To proove something is true, you also can proove everything else is false
|E|:
Words, like normal etc. are descriptions for things(arguments), not arguments themselfes. Also: they can be caused by different facts and it obviously makes more sence to judge the cause, not by description
|F|:
I know that it could sound obvious for the first time you hear it, but hear me out
Something is a pro-Argument, if it prooves, that it makes you feel better, because:
Everything we do is cuz AGREE with the automatically offered decision, because we belive it will make us feel longterm or shortterm better(depends on what you value conciouly and unconciouly more in total)
Even if you try to disproove |F| in the comment section you will do it, because you want others approval, attention, make them percieve you intelligent, higher your status, cuz you belive, all the things will give you happiness
|G|
credits: Ted J. Kaczynski
Wokism is becoming even more stupid( for example: believing there are more than 2 genders) because:
The core idea of wokism, is to fight un-woke things, meaning that only those can be activally woke, who belive in the existance of un-woke things.
As un-woke thing A becomes technically dead, there are 2 options:
1. percieve normal things as un-woke
2. look for other un-woke things
As all actually un-woke things die technically out only option 1 is left, meaning that for example:
2 gender concept needs to be seen as un-woke, otherwise the wokist, wouldnt be woke-active anymore
Woke people also are mostly in industrialised terrains, because:
1. : everyone has a goal, proove:
everyone makes decisions
2. : as basic needs, like food, housing, water etc. become satisfied, other things need to be percieved as needed goals, like killing homophobia, racism etc.
|A|:
if u want to convince someone to belive a lie, its better to use cherrypicking, because:
if u dont:
it means u try to proove something with at least one false argument. And for them to appeal as true arguments, you need to invent new lies and so on and on and at some point there wont be enought details to lie about, causing a contradiction
|B|:
from |A| we know that in discussions, you should proove something with real arguments, not convincening statements, cuz it could cause later on a contradiction
|C|:
one thing can have severall causes, make sure to use |D| RULE to make sure its specifically those few or only one cause you belive it is
|D|:
To proove something is true, you also can proove everything else is false
|E|:
Words, like normal etc. are descriptions for things(arguments), not arguments themselfes. Also: they can be caused by different facts and it obviously makes more sence to judge the cause, not by description
|F|:
I know that it could sound obvious for the first time you hear it, but hear me out
Something is a pro-Argument, if it prooves, that it makes you feel better, because:
Everything we do is cuz AGREE with the automatically offered decision, because we belive it will make us feel longterm or shortterm better(depends on what you value conciouly and unconciouly more in total)
Even if you try to disproove |F| in the comment section you will do it, because you want others approval, attention, make them percieve you intelligent, higher your status, cuz you belive, all the things will give you happiness
|G|
credits: Ted J. Kaczynski
Wokism is becoming even more stupid( for example: believing there are more than 2 genders) because:
The core idea of wokism, is to fight un-woke things, meaning that only those can be activally woke, who belive in the existance of un-woke things.
As un-woke thing A becomes technically dead, there are 2 options:
1. percieve normal things as un-woke
2. look for other un-woke things
As all actually un-woke things die technically out only option 1 is left, meaning that for example:
2 gender concept needs to be seen as un-woke, otherwise the wokist, wouldnt be woke-active anymore
Woke people also are mostly in industrialised terrains, because:
1. : everyone has a goal, proove:
everyone makes decisions
2. : as basic needs, like food, housing, water etc. become satisfied, other things need to be percieved as needed goals, like killing homophobia, racism etc.
Last edited:
