Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy [KEKfuel] Cuckqueers tries to use Psychological research to back up their claims, fails miserably.

ProudIncelistani

ProudIncelistani

Son of Incelistan
-
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Posts
4,301

As they haven't linked the article/essay, and the fact that I cannot find it, I shall refrain from the whole thing and tackle what I've been presented with.

In the article, the key word is: Compensation. Compensation. Compensation, as in "I'm ugly, so I'll just get as much money as I can (I though women weren't gold-diggers?!) and betabux for a woman!".

Nowhere in here does it mention the concept, duration, strength or even TYPE (betabux =parasitism, true love = mutualism) of love present in here. they only mention if a relationship exists or not.

They don't even mention they the requirements for each relationship type! (Alpafux = good genes, while Betabux = $$$ and '''''pewsownawity!!!11!!''''').

All this research tells me is that for Alphafux, women want FACE, and for Betabux, women want $$$ and '''''pewsownawity!!!11!!'''''. In both case, a relationship is established, but their types, love dedicated, duration, and intents are all VERY different. Both of the requirements are complex and vast, but the real CONTENT of those relationships are vastly different!

Don't understand me? I'll use this example:

Take the most currently accepted method of taxonomic classification (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomic_rank for more details). Two animals may of the same genus, but if they aren't of the same species, they cannot interbreed and produce healthy offspring. That's why the Panthera Leo and Panthera Tigris are considered different species but are of the same genus! Just like this, Alphafux, Betabux, and True Love are all 'relationships' at a quick glance, but when we get into the specifics, they are of totally different points of existence!

Need another example? I got you!

r/Braincels and r/IncelTears are both subreddits, but with completely different specific parts! r/IncelTears, r/Cuckold and r/The_Donald are same subreddits with the same community. r/IncelTears and Stormfront are of different platforms, but of same content. In this way, both Alphafux and Betabux are relationships, but their CONTENTS are VERY different!

A third example? Well, I guess that third time's the charm!
Take a look at this Java method:

public static void relationship(int Looksrating, int Height, double totalCash, boolean goodpersonality){
if(Looksrating >= 8 && Height >=6){ // Height >= 6 as in 6 foot!
if(totalCash > 1000000 && goodpersonality ){
System.out.print("I LOVE YOU SO SO SO SO SO SO SO MUCH HONEY!!! :heart::heart::heart::heart:");
} else {
System.out.print("I love you so much! You're the best!");
}
} else {
System.out.print("Hey you fucking piece of shit where's my cash!? I'm going to fuck your best friend tonight even though you don't want me to!");
}
}

This takes in different parameters and returns a result. Despite being complex, it takes the parameters given and returns different results based on those parameters. Similarly, a woman will take in the parameters of a person and return they type of relationship given. Ugly and Short? Hand your $$$ over NOW while I cheat on you! Handsome and Tall? We'll find out in bed!

In short, Cuckqueers fails again at utilizing reseach.

GOOD YARD!
INCELISTAN ZINDABAD!
 
Last edited:
It's almost sad to see how stupid they are. Incelistan Zindabad!
 
if they believe that, they should have a chad and an ugly fucker with a good personality go out and try to pick up chicks and see who gets more.
 
What are your guy's thoughts? Can someone find the original article BTW? It'd be interesting to see it!
if they believe that, they should have a chad and an ugly fucker with a good personality go out and try to pick up chicks and see who gets more.
Exactly! In-depth Quantitative analysis > Blunt Qualitative Analysis!
 
Man, does anyone have the link to the original research and not just a paragraph or two?
 
Are there actually any Incels here who actually study psychology here in university?
 

Similar threads

B
Replies
37
Views
927
ratk
ratk
iraniancel
Replies
8
Views
352
SuperKanga.Belgrade
SuperKanga.Belgrade
ThisSongGoesVerHard
Replies
60
Views
2K
Izayacel
Izayacel
N
Replies
6
Views
362
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
The Scarlet Prince
Replies
111
Views
4K
The Scarlet Prince
The Scarlet Prince

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top