Bangkok or bust
A life of poorer quality due to skull & bones
-
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2018
- Posts
- 4,175
Size 8 to 10 was actually average back in 1950's here in UK.
Some shaming language in the comment section:
weasels, little boys.
I think they're all paedophiles. Size 8 is less than slim. It's prepubescent.
They all bat for the other side surely?
Obviously women can have standards (height, build, face, money, status) but men cannot. All the time women roll their eyes at short men, and they're hardly looking for balding and overweight men. If you want to know who is culling down the dating pool, it's women demanding men be taller than 80 percent of the male population before they'll even look in their direction. Or women who expect men to make more money than they do.
Some shaming language in the comment section:
weasels, little boys.
I think they're all paedophiles. Size 8 is less than slim. It's prepubescent.
They all bat for the other side surely?
Obviously women can have standards (height, build, face, money, status) but men cannot. All the time women roll their eyes at short men, and they're hardly looking for balding and overweight men. If you want to know who is culling down the dating pool, it's women demanding men be taller than 80 percent of the male population before they'll even look in their direction. Or women who expect men to make more money than they do.
The shallow men who refuse to date women over size 8 because they see them as 'lazy', 'not good for my image' and 'sex hungry'
They don’t take care of their health, are lazy and undisciplined and can be too physically dominant in bed. These are just some of the brutal reasons a growing number of young men are giving for no…
www.thesun.co.uk