Discussion Just because 80/20 rule is natural doesn't mean it should be enforced in society.

[Deleted member 25475]

I see quite a lot of people on FDS, old 'femcel' subreddits and here say that since the 80/20 rule is natural, we should only let Chad breed and genocide 80% of men. This is honestly one of the dumbest and hypocritical things someone could say because:

1. By only letting tall Chads live and breed, you're also stopping high IQ incels from breeding who (along with their high IQ kids) could potentially contribute more to society than tall, hunter eyed Chads.

2. Just because its female nature doesn't make it morally right. There are other vile things like rape and murder which are also part of male nature but we established religion and formed a society to suppress, prevent and punish men who did so. Other animals in the animal kingdom still rape and murder other animals all the time. You're a massive hypocrite if you think rape and murder is morally wrong but not the 80/20 rule or female hypergamy just cuz 'it's nature broo '

 

[riceronicel]

I see quite a lot of people on FDS, old 'femcel' subreddits and here say that since the 80/20 rule is natural, we should only let Chad breed and genocide 80% of men. This is honestly one of the dumbest and hypocritical things someone could say because:

1. By only letting tall Chads live and breed, you're also stopping high IQ incels from breeding who (along with their high IQ kids) could potentially contribute more to society than tall, hunter eyed Chads.

2. Just because its female nature doesn't make it morally right. There are other vile things like rape and murder which are also part of male nature but we established religion and formed a society to suppress, prevent and punish men who did so. Other animals in the animal kingdom still rape and murder other animals all the time. You're a massive hypocrite if you think rape and murder is morally wrong but not the 80/20 rule or female hypergamy just cuz 'it's nature broo '

It’s all about foids controlling what men do. I mean it’s biologically natural for men to fuck as many women as possible because from nature men want to spread their seed to as many mates as possible, but no one is going to enforce that shit.

it’s all about control and power. That’s all it is.

 

[Lebensmüder]

I see quite a lot of people on FDS, old 'femcel' subreddits and here say that since the 80/20 rule is natural, we should only let Chad breed and genocide 80% of men. This is honestly one of the dumbest and hypocritical things someone could say because:

1. By only letting tall Chads live and breed, you're also stopping high IQ incels from breeding who (along with their high IQ kids) could potentially contribute more to society than tall, hunter eyed Chads.

2. Just because its female nature doesn't make it morally right. There are other vile things like rape and murder which are also part of male nature but we established religion and formed a society to suppress, prevent and punish men who did so. Other animals in the animal kingdom still rape and murder other animals all the time. You're a massive hypocrite if you think rape and murder is morally wrong but not the 80/20 rule or female hypergamy just cuz 'it's nature broo '

Based, their words are a naturalistic fallacy at its finest (funny that they accuse us of making that mistake while making moralistic fallacies whenever evolutionary psychology/etc. produces results that they don't like).

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

If it's nature want, then look no further than Afghanistan.
The males have all collectively worked together to put women in their place and redistribute the females among themselves.

 

[Deleted member 21230]

Absolutely based, so many incels block themselves because of bullshit moralities

 

[Deleted member 33893]

How is it natural though? Do you really think tribal societies were 80% sexless men who worked and provided for all the women, chads and bastard children.
If men in ancient times were so cucked they would revolt and start mass murdering people. They killed women for cheating.

What the actual fuck would 80% of incels accomplish by remaining in a society where they are denied sex? They would just start their own tribe and raid other tribes for women.

Hypergamy only works in modern day low crime societies where men are super pacified. The same way bashing whites only works today but 100 years ago a newspaper trashing white people would be torched to the ground.

 

[mentally lost cel 1]

I see quite a lot of people on FDS, old 'femcel' subreddits and here say that since the 80/20 rule is natural, we should only let Chad breed and genocide 80% of men. This is honestly one of the dumbest and hypocritical things someone could say because:

1. By only letting tall Chads live and breed, you're also stopping high IQ incels from breeding who (along with their high IQ kids) could potentially contribute more to society than tall, hunter eyed Chads.

2. Just because its female nature doesn't make it morally right. There are other vile things like rape and murder which are also part of male nature but we established religion and formed a society to suppress, prevent and punish men who did so. Other animals in the animal kingdom still rape and murder other animals all the time. You're a massive hypocrite if you think rape and murder is morally wrong but not the 80/20 rule or female hypergamy just cuz 'it's nature broo '

Based and agreed, then men should rape too lol

 

[Deleted member 25475]

How is it natural though? Do you really think tribal societies were 80% sexless men who worked and provided for all the women, chads and bastard children.
If men in ancient times were so cucked they would revolt and start mass murdering people. They killed women for cheating.

8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man

An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.

psmag.com

 

[Deleted member 32183]

in 200 years we will have dark triad 7' 6yr olds with 9x9 cocks

 

[TaciturnCel]

Funny how they always cherry pick and want to implement what benefits them. Them saying only 20 percent of men should breed is basically admitting they only want Chad.

 

[ilieknothing]

If they go with the naturalist argument they should also allow rape and be against child support. If a female of any other animal fucked a male that doesn't want to stay the female is stuck with the kid by itself.

 

[Deleted member 31122]

Just because its female nature doesn't make it morally right. There are other vile things like rape and murder which are also part of male nature but we established religion and formed a society to suppress, prevent and punish men who did so. Other animals in the animal kingdom still rape and murder other animals all the time. You're a massive hypocrite if you think rape and murder is morally wrong but not the 80/20 rule or female hypergamy just cuz 'it's nature broo

If they go with the naturalist argument they should also allow rape and be against child support. If a female of any other animal fucked a male that doesn't want to stay the female is stuck with the kid by itself.

Based, these hypocrites should go back to caves then if they want appeal to nature, nothing in today's world is natural

 

[TheReaper]

women selective mechanism is the same it was in the stone age...
men should create artificial wombs and get rid of these outdated beings.

 

[Deleted member 33893]

8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man

An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.

psmag.com

Yeah and 5000 years ago Europeans were niggers. Then sudden mutation created blonde blue eyed people. The science says so!

They are clearly pushing a narrative you moron. Science won't even admit that Sub saharan Africans on average have lower intelligence than Asians or Europeans

 

[Honeypot]

I see quite a lot of people on FDS, old 'femcel' subreddits and here say that since the 80/20 rule is natural, we should only let Chad breed and genocide 80% of men. This is honestly one of the dumbest and hypocritical things someone could say because:

1. By only letting tall Chads live and breed, you're also stopping high IQ incels from breeding who (along with their high IQ kids) could potentially contribute more to society than tall, hunter eyed Chads.

2. Just because its female nature doesn't make it morally right. There are other vile things like rape and murder which are also part of male nature but we established religion and formed a society to suppress, prevent and punish men who did so. Other animals in the animal kingdom still rape and murder other animals all the time. You're a massive hypocrite if you think rape and murder is morally wrong but not the 80/20 rule or female hypergamy just cuz 'it's nature broo '

Thinking about who contributes more to soyciety is already a mistake, the one who domine society is the one reproducing, that's what females are going for and nature also.

So if you are a powerless incel then you will be virgin all life.

 

[SuccessfulShark]

80/20 isn't natural it's a direct consequence of our retarded society

8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man

An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.

psmag.com

This study doesn't mean anything because if you have warlords like ghengis khan creating a shit ton of offspring does not mean that the average male doesn't reproduce while still creating that diffrence in variability. Also almost all men who did not reproduced died before being able to do so or had their offspring killed.

 

[BITG]

Arguments that appeal to nature are usually fucking stupid as many things in nature would not be best for society. Women are stupid.

 

[Deleted member 25475]

Yeah and 5000 years ago Europeans were niggers. Then sudden mutation created blonde blue eyed people. The science says so!

They are clearly pushing a narrative you moron. Science won't even admit that Sub saharan Africans on average have lower intelligence than Asians or Europeans

Mirin the level of coping here. You don't even have a valid argument. Just pure unadulterated cope lmao. Whos 'they' and what would they get from pushing this 'narrative'?

 

[Deleted member 33893]

Mirin the level of coping here. You don't even have a valid argument. Just pure unadulterated cope lmao. Whos 'they' and what would they get from pushing this 'narrative'?

Who knows but I can prove that "science" is used to push a narrative. James Watson for example was scrutinized for daring to mention the racial difference. Modern science denies genetic racial difference in intelligence. Modern science also claims that gender dysphoria is not a mental illness and that trannies are actually women.

So you can take modern "science" with a grain of salt.

You and the "scientists" are free to give me an example of how a society would work with 16 out of 17 men being virgins, or 94.1% of the population. And who took care of children birthed by 17 women. And how the hell did a small tribe control so many sexless men and prevent them from raping women. You're seriously telling me that in a tribe of 51 men and 51 women, 3 men managed to prevent 48 men from murdering them and raping their women.

 

[SneakPower611]

If hypergamy is natural, then rape is also.

 

[Deleted member 25475]

Who knows but I can prove that "science" is used to push a narrative. James Watson for example was scrutinized for daring to mention the racial difference. Modern science denies genetic racial difference in intelligence. Modern science also claims that gender dysphoria is not a mental illness and that trannies are actually women.

So you can take modern "science" with a grain of salt.

You and the "scientists" are free to give me an example of how a society would work with 16 out of 17 men being virgins, or 94.1% of the population. And who took care of children birthed by 17 women. And how the hell did a small tribe control so many sexless men and prevent them from raping women. You're seriously telling me that in a tribe of 51 men and 51 women, 3 men managed to prevent 48 men from murdering them and raping their women.

Genuinely the most retarded argument I've ever heard.

Who knows

So basically you don't even know who or why someone would try to push the narrative that you're talking about. You don't even know what you're talking about lmfao.
"Your study is wrong....because it is wrong teehee"

Modern science denies genetic racial difference in intelligence. Modern science also claims that gender dysphoria is not a mental illness and that trannies are actually women.

There are research papers which prove the opposite as well that come under 'modern science'.

You can't dismiss science as a whole just because there were a few studies being used to fuel someones political agenda. The study I posted holds water until individually proven otherwise.

 

[Deleted member 33833]

That's also retarded and ironic because that ''kill the uglies'' rule would apply to women as well, and 100% the totality of all FDS users, which are entitled below average landwhales.

 

[Simulacrasimulation]

natural rule argumenet of the SJW brigade is a farce, is absolute bollucks

herr derr natural law when it suits us herrr derrr society protect me when the law of nature doesn't align with m'a'ams own self interest

complete wang

I am bigger than 95% of people i see on the streets heavier more muscle, I could by natural law take what I wanted from women and society and even chads by force at any stage if herrrrrrrrr derrrrr its just nature bro, surviuval of the fittest bro

but IF I do this , nononono bro its a metaphor bro survival of the fittest is not literal bro its the new millenium bro survival of the fittest means using your brain bro, its the survival of the socially fittest bro, what did you think it means bro

its pure redefinition of terms after the game has begun, which for anyone with morals is a big no no, any binding contract you do not get to renegotiate after you sign on the dotted line. Its like signing for a job and then the employer in the first week saying nonnonononon that wage nonononono its not in pounds silly its in dollars NOW FUCK OFF INKWELL

ITS MORALLY BANKRUPT

every douche and self serving person in history fixes and ammends definitions of the terms of engagement WHILE THE GAME IS OCCURING THEY NEVER STICK TO DEFINITIONS AGREED BEFORE THE START OF THE GAME.