i don't understand how they do not equate to lookism denial. People just reply 'looks includes race' but don't address the fact you can be ugly enough for it not to work.
JBW even more retarded. 4/10 ugly whites 90% of the time are incel so the theory is meaningless. It's a cope that helps ethnics inflate their incels.is ego. That's it.
That's above and beyond a statistically significant increase, but they don't care about rationality. The idea is if you cope, you can't tell if you're right or wrong, you just think you are right, even if the theory you use is retarded. I see this all over the forum every day with no end.
Race matters yes, average rice is incel. Doesn't prove 'Just be white' it just means it matters, which is not the theory. If an IT member said 'being ugly matters, but is not preventatory', they would be wrong, and we'd call them out. So why is it OK for JBW to not follow the same logic yet still be something people believe?
what i hate most is being in the minority opinion, so having people hate you for saying it, when that is exactly what lookism deniers do to
. As soon as it's a discussion in which we can join the biased side if we are that race, majority of user are biased. Which proves we are no more rational, and thinking it is similarly, another feel good cope. Users consistently hate me for calling out their copes. That is also what bluepillers do to blackpillers. They get mad at the reality because they don't like it.
