Venting I've never thought that love was made by fate/ by cosmic will/ by something special like the spirit.

[Pinpoint]

It's made from material substance resources.
Most people's hearts/ love/ spirit who would love the girl better htan the person with the material susbtance she wants don't even get a cahnce.
That's not divine/ cosmic/ romantic fairytale...
That's raw primality that women don't even care to recognize. BIOLOGY runs this world, not the heart/ benevolent nature of the universe lmao. Nothing is produce through the beauty/ grace of the world. Everything we see artound us was brutally refined... not gracefully.
Their hormones take precedence over ideals.
Putting ideology/ fact/ moral shame in front of their faces is like putting lettuce in front of a pit bull when cooked steak is behind it.
You'll just piss it off.

Most people in life who get anythign are those who have mateiral substance. Women think if you try and ocmpensate with humor (usually sometimes) or personality, religion, etc. etc. that you're just full of shit/ charlataning. Women have a reptillian brain oriented attention span. You're not safe around women. You're in a tank full of electric eels when you walk among them. Humanitarian society though won't tell you so.

 

[Lifeisbullshit95]

200 IQ

 

[janoycresva]

cope

 

[Pinpoint]

If you ever think that women care about anything that's not material you're sadly mistaken.
The people who could be the best suited for eahcother if you isolate their personalities, tastes, humor, interests are irrelevant because they are reptillian brain oriented attention spanned. They want appearance, dominance, status, power, beauty, etc.
Men have hobbies revolving around being dominant, cool, muscular, combative, etc.
Everything about a woman is about allurement, taking the best out ofh te bunch fo guys.
Men win women wherever they can find them which opens up more avenues for women to be taken. We're less picky and more horny.
Women are more judgmental/ frigid/ selective. Maybe even less superfcial than us. Halo effect talks more about a persons' identity than their expression does.
(Men are superficial, as are women. However I'd say it's about just as rare for women to be not superficial as men are. Both are equally, but women are more superficial/ selective... but the superficiality of the body structure of a male is far more important, because they can only have one mate, whereas men must have many) (I used to believe women were less superficial. In some ways they can be more sensible. But I believe that men choose to be not superficial when they want a companion. Women choose not to be sueprficial when they're sapiosexual, which is rare, and also a strenuous substance to secure amongst the masses.)
THERE'S SO MUCH about socializing that has so many pitfalls based on superficiality that we shouldn't even want to socialize. But we do because we want to do it for our ego. people are too dark/ mean/ cruel to ever have the main appeal of socialization to be for bonding with people. It's the novelty, and what the vanity value we have says about us.

The core of all real relationships is vanity. It's not communality.
If people wanted communion then they wouldn't want to be around people for the sake of how attractive, dominant, selective, hard to get they would be.