Serious I've never lost an argument

[Stupid Clown]

I have always been right because I don't base my beliefs on personal observations alone. I only believe something if it's proven and verified by evidence. thus I have almost never actually lost an argument. What's happened is after posting evidence normies simply get angry and sperg out. Yet I have never genuinely lost an argument because I'm not a fucking normie retard or woman who speaks out of their ass

Arguments are useless tho. Most people are too retarded to understand anything

 

[Grodd]

Arguments are useless tho. Most people are too retarded to understand anything

Exactly

 

[SilverBullet]

Arguments are useless tho. Most people are too retarded to understand anything

 

[Logic55]

I only believe something if it's proven and verified by evidence.

this is exactly why i dont believe in race "realism"

 

[SuperKanga.Belgrade]

Same

I once got into an argument about abortion with my sister and she walked off all pissed because she lost the argument

 

[Stupid Clown]

this is exactly why i dont believe in race "realism"

I do believe in it but to an extent that'd annoy the faggots worshiping nords.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Same

I once got into an argument about abortion with my sister and she walked off all passed because she lost the argument

LOL

Similar experience here.

 

[Apokalypse]

Arguments are useless tho. Most people are too retarded to understand anything

 

[logician]

In my opinion, debates should be used to arrive at a truth rather than a battle with a winner and a loser, which is why I try to bring as many arguments as possible to push my interlocutor into a corner to see if he's using sophistry or making concrete points.

It's normie behavior to want to get the upper hand over your interlocutor in order to feel better about yourself.

 

[Stupid Clown]

In my opinion, debates should be used to arrive at a truth rather than a battle with a winner and a loser, which is why I try to bring as many arguments as possible to push my interlocutor into a corner to see if he's using sophistry or making concrete points.

It's normie behavior to want to get the upper hand over your interlocutor in order to feel better about yourself.

Yes.

 

[Todd Thundercock]

I've never had an argument because I don't care what others believe.

 

[RechargedSamsung]

I wish i can be socially intelligent to win a argument

 

[Friezacel]

Most people, especially NT ones will never admit defeat in an argument. Instead when they see that they are losing, they will try to gaslight you, make stuff up and try to make you look like the crazy one, because otherwise their fragile ego would get crushed if they admitted defeat

 

[Stupid Clown]

Most people, especially NT ones will never admit defeat in an argument. Instead when they see that they are losing, they will try to gaslight you, make stuff up and try to make you look like the crazy one, because otherwise their fragile ego would get crushed if they admitted defeat

Yep.

 

[DarkStar]

Arguments are useless tho. Most people are too retarded to understand anything

This, especially online ones

Although you can pick up on signs, you can't fully tell if someone is trolling, baiting, or just wants to argue for the sake of arguing and might not have faith in the beliefs even.

I have always been right because I don't base my beliefs on personal observations alone.

I do agree somewhat, but a lot of the times what you see irl and online can correlate with data

Finding that "sweet spot" between the two is the best imo

Most people, especially NT ones will never admit defeat in an argument. Instead when they see that they are losing, they will try to gaslight you, make stuff up and try to make you look like the crazy one, because otherwise their fragile ego would get crushed if they admitted defeat

Curries love to go on tangents, derail topics, etc.

this is exactly why i dont believe in race "realism"

Theres plenty of telling examples already...

And as said, the scientific community nowadays is heavily biased

 

[Logic55]

And as said, the scientific community nowadays is heavily biased

So are the race "realists" who assert that races are inherently more intelligent than others.

 

[DarkStar]

So are the race "realists" who assert that races are inherently more intelligent than others.

Deflection

They acknowledged that racial differences exist on various biological levels, which would logically assume it extends to IQ & other behavioral forms

I'm busy right now, but I have stuff I could share to add onto this later.

 

[Logic55]

Deflection

They acknowledged that racial differences exist on various biological levels, which would logically assume it extends to IQ & other behavioral forms

I'm busy right now, but I have stuff I could share to add onto this later.

You are the one deflecting from the scientific community by saying that they are biased. They have demonstrated that IQ is a fixed trait and is not determined by race because genes that are linked to Iq are universal, not exclusive to certain races . All humans are genetically similar, about 99% it the estimate, the remaining 1% of genes influence physical Appearance which is why each race looks different.

 

[logician]

You are the one deflecting from the scientific community by saying that they are biased. They have demonstrated that IQ is a fixed trait and is not determined by race because genes that are linked to Iq are universal, not exclusive to certain races . All humans are genetically similar, about 99% it the estimate, the remaining 1% of genes influence physical Appearance which is why each race looks different.

Yup

"Studies over the past 50 years based on IQ tests have suggested that there could be inherent differences in intelligence between racial groups, social classes and between men and women, but these conclusions are undermined by the latest findings, Dr Highfield said."

“We already know that, from a scientific point of view, the notion of race is meaningless. Genetic differences do not map on to traditional measurements of skin colour, hair type, body proportions and skull measurements. Now we have shown that IQ is meaningless too,” Dr Highfield said.

 

[Orzmund]

Socrates IQ