Hypocrisy It's funny how normies think that attractiveness is subjective, but they give us the same objective advice on how to get a girl.

[ordinaryotaku]

I've been reading a book about arguments and fallacies and those sorts, and I just realized that there is a big one that has not been pointed out yet, so I'd like to try this out with my newfound knowledge.

Normies start out by saying "girls are attractive to ALL types of guys! Nerdy, fat, average, short, it doesn't matter," or by saying that "attractiveness is subjective, and not necessarily physical either!", which is basically the same thing.

And then they give you a list of things you have to do, in their objective thought, which they think will help you get a girl. Now watch me use these examples (that I personally have been told) clearly, and notice how I can basically use what they said to turn their original argument against them.

"Get a haircut bro!"

And not to mention, the haircut they have in mind always looks something like this, making it objectively the best haircut to get girls, apparently. They don't give a fuck about what your face shape is and how it can pertain to the way your haircut looks on you, their suggestions always have to be some neo-Hitler Youth looking ass haircut:

I can just turn this argument around and say "What if girls aren't attracted to guys with haircuts? What if they don't like that specific haircut? Girls are attracted to all types of guys, right? And attractiveness is subjective?"

And what about showering? They always say that we have to shower, but since they say that women can be attracted to all types of men, I can just say:

"Well, some girls might not be attracted to guys who shower. Attractiveness is subjective to girls, you said so yourself. Some girls might be attracted to guys who smell like a perfect trifecta of feces, urine, and ejaculate!"

And what about general hygiene?

"Well, women can be attracted to guys who have severe cystic acne and don't brush their teeth, attractiveness is subjective, isn't it?"

Why do normies state that there is an objective way to get women even though attractiveness in their eyes seems to be subjective? It's such interesting normoid hypocrisy.

 

[Deleted member 2686]

have a high IQ bump

 

[Deleted member 19546]

their suggestions always have to be some neo-Hitler Youth looking ass haircut

 

[Deleted member 19756]

If most men aren't attractive to foids then obviously these characteristics weren't widely selected throughout evolution.

When you look at most animals you see homogeneous aesthetics. But humans have varying body sizes and faces.

The more homogeneous an ethnicity becomes the more they start to look similar. Any female in a tribe would never be able to go outside that tribe.

The aesthetic choices of modern females are entirely based on abundance of choice. If males had unlimited choice of females we would naturally select the best looking ones.

But because the male sexual drive being so intense we are forced to select increasingly down.

 

[Deleted member 1042]

extraordinaryotaku

 

[KingOfRome]

Devil's advocate here:

Attractiveness may be subjective, but some features have a wider appeal than others, so although there are certain features you should adopt for yourself to increase your chances as much as possible, that doesn't make attractiveness objective.

Of course, the correct rebuttal to the above statement is the most important features are genetically determined, and are based on ratios and proportions that have been figured by and known to the art world for centuries down to the number. The golden ratio mask being the most obvious example of this. Faces that fit the golden ratio mask are objectively more aesthetic than faces that don't.

 

[ordinaryotaku]

Devil's advocate here:

Attractiveness may be subjective, but some features have a wider appeal than others, so although there are certain features you should adopt for yourself to increase your chances as much as possible, that doesn't make attractiveness objective.

Of course, the correct rebuttal to the above statement is the most important features are genetically determined, and are based on ratios and proportions that have been figured by and known to the art world for centuries down to the number. The golden ratio mask being the most obvious example of this. Faces that fit the golden ratio mask are objectively more aesthetic than faces that don't.

This is true and high IQ tbh.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

I'm a baldcel, so the best haircut I can get to please a foid would be for my facial hair and pubes... Both would look like this:

 

[GeneticFilth]

The haircut shit is so fucking annoying. I've had female family members tell me that if I got a haircut girls would like me. They think because of the failo effect I've always had long hair because I'm ugly and wear glasses. I've literally have had every hairstyle from shaved hair to shoulder length hair and it doesn't matter. I get treated like shit and girls are repulsed by me no matter the hairstyle.

 

[needsolution]

normies = lack of logic and stupidity.