
ResidentHell
Veteran
★★
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2022
- Posts
- 1,158
This post is a correction to a previous post:
incels.is
If anything exists other than the ability to think, I am uncertain of its existence (due to a presumption that a Deus deceptor might exist)
Therefore I cannot disprove Statement 1: "Nothing exists, besides the ability to think"
Plus if a Deus deceptor really exists, it would cause Statement 1 to be a potentially true statement
Statement 2: "The only thing in existence that is certain, is the ability to think". If Statement 2 were to be false, then:
(a) The ability to think wouldn't exist, or
(b) There would exist something other than the ability to think that cannot be counterfeited by the Deus deceptor, presupposing the Deus deceptor exists
But the ability to think certainly exists, and there is nothing known to be impossibly deceptive other than the ability to think
Therefore it's just beyond reasonable doubt that Statement 2 is a true statement

Time Doesn’t Exist. All Conceptions of “Beginning” and “End” Are Illusions. Thus, Existence Is Mostly Illusion
Zeno’s Paradox concludes that there is a certain model of casual reasoning that cannot be used to justify the existence of time Zeno’s Paradox is the main dilemma concerning the existence of time. You can summarize the conclusion of Zeno’s Paradox like this: The distance between a “beginning”...

I've decided to agree that time doesn't exist for reasons by @based_meme in previous postYou should narrow your focus and try reformulating your main argument.
If anything exists other than the ability to think, I am uncertain of its existence (due to a presumption that a Deus deceptor might exist)
Therefore I cannot disprove Statement 1: "Nothing exists, besides the ability to think"
Plus if a Deus deceptor really exists, it would cause Statement 1 to be a potentially true statement
Statement 2: "The only thing in existence that is certain, is the ability to think". If Statement 2 were to be false, then:
(a) The ability to think wouldn't exist, or
(b) There would exist something other than the ability to think that cannot be counterfeited by the Deus deceptor, presupposing the Deus deceptor exists
But the ability to think certainly exists, and there is nothing known to be impossibly deceptive other than the ability to think
Therefore it's just beyond reasonable doubt that Statement 2 is a true statement
Last edited: