mNFwTJ3wz9
This system is contradicting of failing, and yet -
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
- Posts
- 9,506
50/4=12.5
No, you are just a mentally retarded dumb whore.
50/4=12.5
No, you are just a mentally retarded dumb whore.
Me or the redditor?No, you are just a mentally retarded dumb whore.
yeah if there's overlap between the variables (which there definitely is with these) you can't just use 50/4 to find the result. so the ITcel isn't totally wrong in this case, speaking mathematicallyThis is assuming each point is uncorrelated. If there's some correlation between some points then the percentage might be a bit higher.
yeah if there's overlap between the variables (which there definitely is with these) you can't just use 50/4 to find the result. so the ITcel isn't totally wrong in this case, speaking mathematically
I'm not.you're not very bright
50/4=12.5
No, you are just a mentally retarded dumb whore.
P(Normal) = product of all ( 1 - P(problems) )
But from a purely math pov it does check out (1-.5)*(1-.5)*(1-.5) = 0.125
not the r*dditors lolAnyone can see that.
.5×.5= .25
.25×.5= .125
Indeed.This is assuming each point is uncorrelated. If there's some correlation between some points then the percentage might be a bit higher.
50/4=12.5
No, you are just a mentally retarded dumb whore.
allah maths50/4=12.5
No, you are just a mentally retarded dumb whore.
typo"looses too much IQ" was that a joke