Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL ITcel/foid looses too much IQ after consuming soy.

mNFwTJ3wz9

mNFwTJ3wz9

This system is contradicting of failing, and yet -
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Posts
9,506
"Sex doesn't mean you have a happy marriage, ":soy:
 
This is assuming each point is uncorrelated. If there's some correlation between some points then the percentage might be a bit higher.
 
This is assuming each point is uncorrelated. If there's some correlation between some points then the percentage might be a bit higher.
yeah if there's overlap between the variables (which there definitely is with these) you can't just use 50/4 to find the result. so the ITcel isn't totally wrong in this case, speaking mathematically
 
yeah if there's overlap between the variables (which there definitely is with these) you can't just use 50/4 to find the result. so the ITcel isn't totally wrong in this case, speaking mathematically

P(Normal) = product of all ( 1 - P(problems) )
But from a purely math pov it does check out (1-.5)*(1-.5)*(1-.5) = 0.125
 
No Chad dick for a few days really messes up with a hole's brain.
 
And they think the reason we want to replace them with robots is so we can abuse the robots... it's so our souls aren't abused by biofoids.

Waifubots and artificial wombs are the only way to save the world.
 
P(Normal) = product of all ( 1 - P(problems) )
But from a purely math pov it does check out (1-.5)*(1-.5)*(1-.5) = 0.125

Anyone can see that.

.5×.5= .25
.25×.5= .125
 
look at the mathematicians in the comments. every incel mogs them so hard they geek out over the most retarded shit
 
From what I understand the math is wrong tho

Let's call the property of "foid has backup man" as A, "sex once per week" as B and "divorce" as C

Now it's not 50% of 50% of 50% (12.5%) of the number of marriages, all three take from the same "pool" (which is the number of all marriages)

So first you have 50% of marriages with A and 50% with notA

Then you have another 50% of B that could totally overlap (all that A, also do B), partially overlap (some A also do B, some B also do A, some do both, some do none) or not overlap at all (if A, then notB and if B then notA), this last one is actually the worst one because it means that all marriages have one problem be it either A or B, while in the first case all that had A also had B leaving 50% of good marriages

Then you have C, again it could overlap totally or partially with A and B, if doesn't overlap at all with both it means that A and B left that 50% of "free space" (first case scenario with B) but it doesn't matter because C would occupy the remaining 50% making all marriages bad anyway

Basically, best case scenario: all three overlap and 50% of marriages are good, while the other 50% have A,B and C
Worst case scenario (reality): A,B and C partially overlap between them or don't overlap at all filling the whole "space" of marriages with at least one bad thing
 
"looses too much IQ" was that a joke
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Ubermenschvirtues
Replies
2
Views
202
hopeless_cel
hopeless_cel
RechargedSamsung
Replies
23
Views
601
Wolnir
Wolnir
RealSchizo
Replies
21
Views
297
Rapist
Rapist
NeverGetUp36
Replies
19
Views
504
NeverGetUp36
NeverGetUp36

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top