He is almost there, now he needs to start hating women.
Lack of self awareness:zero
Finally they accept blackpill
They finally looked at themselves in the mirror.
no shit sherlock! Foids and white pussies talking about us, they cannot focus on their pathetic lifes
Foids aren't "normal people"
Posted without any apparent irony on a sub reddit with hundreds of thousands of users.
Every IT member deserves to be spaded and neutered so they don't spread their shit intelligence. Looks aren't the only genes that matter.
Finally they accept defeat.
“Incels aren’t ugly! “
Average incel supposedly:
“Average incel supposedly:
He's on the right path. IMO there are two halves to the blackpill
1. Women are instinctively, genetically programmed to seek out mates with certain characteristics: height, face, race, wealth or some other manifestation of power.
2. If you don't have all (or at least most) of those desirable characteristics, it's over for you.
That IT user is showing some basic appreciation of (2).
But as an active redditor he will be a long way away from understanding or admitting to himself that (1) is true.
So he's just jumped to the conclusion (2) that anyone can observe, even without much real understanding of the reason (1).
That's not blackpilled (IMHO.) But it is the beginning of it. He's on the right path, maybe we'll see him join here one day.
Holy fuck look at the comments. IT is retarded as shit
“It doesn’t matter if incels are ugly! “ Yes, let’s ignore the multiple studies that analyze how lookism affects ugly people in multiple areas of life. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lookism
Lookism, the prejudice or discrimination based on physical attractiveness, casts a long shadow across society, subtly influencing our interactions, opportunities, and even our perceptions of reality. While often overlooked compared to more widely acknowledged forms of discrimination like racism and sexism, lookism has profound and far-reaching consequences. This essay will explore the nature of lookism, its impact on individuals and society, and the ethical and legal considerations surrounding this pervasive prejudice.
The article highlights the "what is beautiful is good" stereotype, where physical attractiveness is associated with positive qualities like intelligence, competence, and social success. This "halo effect" benefits attractive individuals, often leading to preferential treatment in various aspects of life, from dating and social circles to employment opportunities. Conversely, those deemed unattractive may face significant disadvantages, including limited social opportunities, lower self-esteem, and even increased vulnerability to certain crimes.
Research suggests that lookism is deeply ingrained, with preferences for attractive faces evident even in infants. This innate bias, combined with societal reinforcement, perpetuates a culture that places undue emphasis on physical appearance. The pressure to conform to idealized beauty standards can have detrimental effects on mental and emotional well-being.
The article also delves into the political implications of lookism, noting how it can influence voter perceptions and electoral outcomes. Attractive candidates may enjoy an unfair advantage, while less conventionally attractive individuals may face heightened scrutiny and criticism. This phenomenon, coupled with the objectification of both men and women in politics, underscores the need for a more nuanced understanding of how appearance impacts political discourse and representation.
While some argue that judgments based on appearance are natural and even beneficial for survival, the article raises critical ethical questions. Is it justifiable to discriminate against individuals based solely on their physical appearance? How can we create a society that values individuals for their character, abilities, and contributions rather than their looks?
The article concludes by examining the legal landscape of lookism. While some protections exist, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act in the United States, comprehensive legal frameworks addressing discrimination based on appearance are largely absent. This lack of legal recourse leaves individuals vulnerable to the pervasive and often insidious effects of lookism.
In conclusion, lookism is a significant social issue with far-reaching consequences. By acknowledging its existence, understanding its impact, and challenging the societal norms that perpetuate it, we can strive towards a more equitable and inclusive society where individuals are valued for their inherent worth and not solely based on their physical appearance.
“ Yes, let’s ignore the multiple studies that analyze how lookism affects ugly people in multiple areas of life. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LookismLookism, the prejudice or discrimination based on physical attractiveness, casts a long shadow across society, subtly influencing our interactions, opportunities, and even our perceptions of reality. While often overlooked compared to more widely acknowledged forms of discrimination like racism and sexism, lookism has profound and far-reaching consequences. This essay will explore the nature of lookism, its impact on individuals and society, and the ethical and legal considerations surrounding this pervasive prejudice.
The article highlights the "what is beautiful is good" stereotype, where physical attractiveness is associated with positive qualities like intelligence, competence, and social success. This "halo effect" benefits attractive individuals, often leading to preferential treatment in various aspects of life, from dating and social circles to employment opportunities. Conversely, those deemed unattractive may face significant disadvantages, including limited social opportunities, lower self-esteem, and even increased vulnerability to certain crimes.
Research suggests that lookism is deeply ingrained, with preferences for attractive faces evident even in infants. This innate bias, combined with societal reinforcement, perpetuates a culture that places undue emphasis on physical appearance. The pressure to conform to idealized beauty standards can have detrimental effects on mental and emotional well-being.
The article also delves into the political implications of lookism, noting how it can influence voter perceptions and electoral outcomes. Attractive candidates may enjoy an unfair advantage, while less conventionally attractive individuals may face heightened scrutiny and criticism. This phenomenon, coupled with the objectification of both men and women in politics, underscores the need for a more nuanced understanding of how appearance impacts political discourse and representation.
While some argue that judgments based on appearance are natural and even beneficial for survival, the article raises critical ethical questions. Is it justifiable to discriminate against individuals based solely on their physical appearance? How can we create a society that values individuals for their character, abilities, and contributions rather than their looks?
The article concludes by examining the legal landscape of lookism. While some protections exist, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act in the United States, comprehensive legal frameworks addressing discrimination based on appearance are largely absent. This lack of legal recourse leaves individuals vulnerable to the pervasive and often insidious effects of lookism.
In conclusion, lookism is a significant social issue with far-reaching consequences. By acknowledging its existence, understanding its impact, and challenging the societal norms that perpetuate it, we can strive towards a more equitable and inclusive society where individuals are valued for their inherent worth and not solely based on their physical appearance.
Last edited:
IT is heartless so they disagree with this
NO SHIT!
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
