Ecstasy said:
I've yet to see just ONE of these comicc that doesnt portray us as a neckbeards. It really shows that these people are 30-something old boomers who are completely out of touch with time. This shit is 2012 tier and incels are completely anti-neckbeard.
What even qualifies as neckbeard nowadays? The definition is so vague and twisted, in thanks part to people like these who change its meaning and get that new meaning popular through mass disgust.
Sex will never be seen as a basic need because it requires someone who doesn't want to give to give. The same argument is made to "I don't owe you a job/friends/money/respect/basic human decency" etc. People are still animals out there, they haven't learned empathy and most never will. Until you are willing to give up your happiness to make an unhappy person happy, e.g. a homeless person, a broke redneck about to lose their home, or a criminal stuck in a cycle, you aren't a human in my eyes. Humanity requires sacrifice.
I talk to, help out, wingman, people who are worse off than me in ways because I know their pain as a fellow low-tier person. High-tier people are sore winners and blind assholes who think the world is fair - yeah, it's fair to THEM - it's tilted in THEIR favour, just like how high-metabolism people call low-metas lazy or gluttonous - it's fair to THEM.
The day we remove normie genes from the gene pool is the day people actually accept friendship, sex, and meaningful employment (???) as basic needs. Until then, they call everyone who they are asked to help out "entitled" because helping someone lower on the food chain is not their business (it's nobody's business, so nothing changes!). Obviously a person can try and fail, and they will tell them to keep trying or to give up and move on, ignoring the experiences, ignoring anecdotes, ignoring science, ignoring anything that might force them to accept they are selfish and entitled in turn.
To me, a person who says "I don't have to be your friend because you want friends, I don't like you and nobody owes you it, even if you have nothing to offer and it's not your fault" is subhuman. Worthy of basic human decency and politeness but no respect. Respect is a two-way road and if you won't appreciate those below you, they can't appreciate you for abandoning them. A person who says that line above is just as if not more entitled than the person who asked for help, because they think they don't owe that lower person help, and that thinking is animalistic and anti-human, it's immoral and wrong. You DO owe people help as a higher-tier person. Born a winner, you OWE losers help. It's not their fault nor yours they are losers, but they are putting in their half to fix it - why aren't you? Because you don't have to? There's an old Russian expression: if you don't know, we'll teach you. If you can't, we'll help you. If you don't want to, we'll force you.
Normal people are literally killing us passively by forcing us to be lonely and often unemployed if not homeless, and they feel shocked, disgusted, and offended that we would dare ask or even force them to help us improve in any sense. They feel entitled that they are better than us and don't need to help us.
"Can you help me with x?"
"No, I don't owe you shit. You're entitled AF".
"Well, you're entitled too. You feel entitled to not help me".
"No, I don't owe you shit. That's not entitlement".
"You do owe me, as a fellow human being and as a more successful and happy person".
"No I don't, too bad for you, too good for me".
"You're a sore winner".
"You're a sore loser".
"This wasn't a fair game".
"Too bad. That's nature, animal eat animal, law of the jungle".
"So you confess you're an animal and not a human?"
"What's the difference?"
"Humans have empathy and morals, altruism even".
"No they don't".
"Well then, why is it wrong for me to act hateful or violent then?"
"Because that's wrong, nobody deserves that".
"But I deserve to be lonely?"
"Yes, that's how it is. The strong use their strength to keep the weak in check".
"That's fucked".
"Too bad so sad loser."
"If you're an animal, you only have an animal's rights. Not a human's. No right to life or liberty, or fair treatment and respect".
"No, you have rights to live. You don't have rights to friends or anything past".
"So people who are born medically ill get help to survive, but I'm ill and I don't?"
"You don't need people to survive. Just air and food and shelter".
"Loneliness and joblessness leads to lower life expectancy, misery, and rapid aging etc."
"Too bad so sad".
"Again you're not human, humans use fairness to make up for natural imbalances".
"Only to the extent of staying alive"
"Why not past that? What's the difference?"
"Because it costs enough to raise leeches enough to survive, leave alone give them normal lives"
"So you aren't really helping those people who would die naturally because you're a good person, it's just guilt. You still hate them. You're a bigot"
"You're a bigot. You want to force people to give you things you want but don't need. You don't care about them"
"They don't care about me, they force me to
not have those things, what's the difference, again?"
"The difference is that in nature their way rules and yours doesn't"
"Again, tell me why I should give you human rights when you follow animal morality, or lack therefore of? If you don't owe me human principles, I don't owe you them either"
"Life and liberty is worth more than loneliness"
"Suicide causes and the fact people do crazy things to get and keep friends, dates, and jobs, not to mention family, would disagree"
"I don't need your facts or stories"
"You don't want to accept you're a hypocrite"
"I don't need to deal with this"
"Yes you do, you need to face up to your own double standards. Subtle needs are just as important as blatant ones, you just want to think elsewise because you're lazy and selfish and can get away with the subtle things. Ironic how normies like you tell autists like me to read between the lines when you choose not to yourselves for your own conveniences."
"..."
"Double standard again. Subtle things count when I miss them but when you miss them they're not important".
(They leave, having given up).
^ The above is something I imagined, I've had similar conversations but never word for word.
Maxxer said:
No, it is not. You don't need sex to be alive. You need shelter for proper temperature and protection, you need water for hydratation and food for energy, but sex does not sustain you body. However, being alive is not living, and without sex you're not really living.
Nobody cares. They don't owe you a life, only to be alive. Your happiness is not their problem. They don't care if you're a living husk, they say 'You're alive, my job is done, my morals are satisfied". If you can't be happy on your own, or rather be happy alone in a society that hates you for it despite the fact you can't change it on your own, too bad. They don't care you're unhappy. Too bad so sad. Bad luck. Have fun in your misery! Better luck next time! (aka never because religion is bullshit).
