Ask the institute to make you a synth gf bro.
Wuold reply with truth but don't wanna get suspended for bragging again.
Back when I was blue pilled I prevented the rape of four foids.
Now I wonder how many I am owed to balance the scales.
But that’s not the way it works.
It should though. We must preserve the livelihood of an inherent reward/ punishment system. Equilibrium must be maintained.
If you were punished with bad genes then you are exempt from the moral code in order to make things equal for you. Cast a more overshadowing system of fairness over the moralistic system that we've been bombarded with.
If you are a model citizen, but you are cursed with bad genes then the universe stopped you from giving a good influence. It stopped you form doing what was necessary and good. So you must punish nature by making certain human civilization succeeds in ruling over it.
The God of Delicate Sensibilities can only be prominent if we eliminate nature, the insensible and the judgmental like the foids who critique us based on looks.
Abusing foids is just instilling respect and gratitude over the freedoms that people end up using for vanity.
If you have freedom for people they end up just having vanity (western culture is just the biological consequence of freedom). However giving people the means to want rightness to be FORCED by people with a truly delicate sensibility receptive mentality is MORE important than anything.
How did you stop their rape lol.
IMO putting the vain and judgmental/ primal down is okay. You're just the victim'd underdog trying to instill cosmical equilibrium on the world. If life were unfair to you, then you have permission and the green light to be immoral to those who were treated more fair.
Being nice to them just allows them to keep gravytraining life. You do NOT want that to happen. At least if you want female entitlement to END.
I don't think ugly men must be willingly evil, but a certain amount of light cheating (like tax evasion) seems tolerable in their case, as a way to reequilibrate things in their favor after the horrible hand they were given.
I don't pretend to speak for God, though. Traditional religious morality is often "one size fits all" and the law is sacred.
The one size fits all morality is a veiled tyranny. It allows for one standard to govern all, and to expect this sacred rule to be seen as of God. But it will benefit some others more and then leave those it detriments to rut, and it's sacred rule established by "God" that those advantaged by it keep going.
It's not willingly evil.
It's just knowing that morality isn't one dimensional.
And realizing that sometimes, equity is more important than equally endorsed ethics.
Equally endorsed ethics as speaking of one unifying condition are reductionistic and narrow minded.
You will need equity for those less biologically enfrnachised by privileging them with waht they need to get even.
It's what political correctness promoted when they protested the rule of law set down by whites in the latter half of the 20th century.
So why shouldn't it apply to incels?
There are unspoken rules out there that humanity doesn'T want to take into account because typically the morals that are set in place are bluepill brainwashing, and the powerful devise them, and people aren't mentally strong enough in the mainstream to really make a society changing statement.
