Blackpill It is legal to discrimate against people who are ugly

[CrackingYs]

Every category of trait that you can think of is illlegal to discimate against... except attractiveness.

If any liberal normie soy bluepill faggot lurker thinks they are in the right for denying the blackpill they need to come up with a reason why refusing to hire people based on the attractiveness of their faces and bone structure is a good thing, and why it is routinely used across nearly all facets of life.

What Is Unlawful Discrimination And How Do I Know If I’ve Been Discriminated Against?

Here we look at unlawful discrimination - the 9 protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 - and the 4 types of discrimination

www.truthlegal.com

The protected characteristics are

1. sex / gender
2. marital status (including civil partnership)
3. pregnancy and maternity
4. race, nationality or ethnic / national origins (includes skin colour)
5. religion or belief
6. disability
7. age
8. sexual orientation
9. gender reassignment

No, attractiveness is not on this list, which means its legal and acceptible practice.

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

Lol not if you're a woman sweetie

 

[PPEcel]

I suppose one barrier to legally crack down on discrimination against subhumans like us is that ugliness is harder to define, whereas all of those other protected classes are pretty straightforward.

 

[rope2cope]

It doesn't matter, if you're like one of 20 for a job interview and an Incel walks in he's going to get denied anyway and they certainly won't tell you the real reason why.

Good luck proving it.

 

[Deleted member 22572]

Normies have no empathy. They need to be told what to think. They need to be told what is good and bad so they can virtue signal about stuff. They need to be told that discriminating based on looks is bad.

I've said this before ik but one time I was with a teacher after I beat up someone who bullied me and she asked why (he was making jokes about my face and Makin fun of me being ugly) and the teacher laughed and dismissed it and none of my bullies were given any punishment whatsoever

 

[Personalityinkwell]

I suppose one barrier to legally crack down on discrimination against subhumans like us is that ugliness is harder to define, whereas all of those other protected classes are pretty straightforward.

the real reason is because ugly men suffer far more than ugly women do, that's why lookism is tolerated

 

[PPEcel]

the real reason is because ugly men suffer far more than ugly women do, that's why lookism is tolerated

That's another reason, of course.

But they really should implement affirmative action for the unattractive.

 

[your personality]

I suppose one barrier to legally crack down on discrimination against subhumans like us is that ugliness is harder to define, whereas all of those other protected classes are pretty straightforward.

Racism is just another form of lookism. It's pretty amazing normies don't see how hypocritical and messed up it is to make fun of ugly males but know that it is messed up to make fun of someone because of racial stereotypes of physical features like big lips.
Both are things that can't be controlled but normies see it as fine to make fun of ugly males for the looks they have even though those males can't control how they look just as much as a person being mocked for their race can't control what race they were born as.

It doesn't matter, if you're like one of 20 for a job interview and an Incel walks in he's going to get denied anyway and they certainly won't tell you the real reason why.

Good luck proving it.

From the way people let it slip now and then that nerdy hobbies and subjects are full of incels and make references to how there are so many Chinese and Indian guys in those areas it should be obvious that normies also know inceldom is related to a male's looks and amount of sex appeal from physical characteristics.
It becomes even more clear if incel looking males insist they aren't that bad looking or even attractive. Then normies will let you know where you stand and that looks being subjective is just a feel good dismissal.

 

[ChinaCurry]

I suppose one barrier to legally crack down on discrimination against subhumans like us is that ugliness is harder to define, whereas all of those other protected classes are pretty straightforward.

But a way can be found. In curryland it's illegal to discriminate on skin colour, because otherwise the lightskinned Aryans mog the shitskins too much, and colour is hard to define too.

Agree it's not straightforward, but as the world moves from 80-20 rule to 99-1 and soon 99.9-0.1, it is going to get ever more important.

One approach might be reservations /AA/ quotas for ugly, short, fat, stupid, dark skin people. These generally do work with resetting social norms and mobility, the problem is they get corrupted, and don't get removed when they were supposed to.

Racism is just another form of lookism. It's pretty amazing normies don't see how hypocritical and messed up it is to make fun of ugly males but know that it is messed up to make fun of someone because of racial stereotypes of physical features like big lips.
Both are things that can't be controlled but normies see it as fine to make fun of ugly males for the looks they have even though those males can't control how they look just as much as a person being mocked for their race can't control what race they were born as.


From the way people let it slip now and then that nerdy hobbies and subjects are full of incels and make references to how there are so many Chinese and Indian guys in those areas it should be obvious that normies also know inceldom is related to a male's looks and amount of sex appeal from physical characteristics.
It becomes even more clear if incel looking males insist they aren't that bad looking or even attractive. Then normies will let you know where you stand and that looks being subjective is just a feel good dismissal.

Everything you say is true, yes 10% of Nordic and meds are good looking Vs 0.001% of rice and curry men, but racism and lookism are separate.

Firstly, stormfronters will push their muh white race agenda regardless of how the ethnic looks, probably go harder against the good looking ethnic as he's a bigger perceived threat than the ugly, study maxxed, introvert.

Secondly while race pill and lookism are highly correlated, there is always am additional coefficient for race. Roshan, Abraham, Borkan, Fawad khan, Naqvi all have the SMV of a 3/10 JBW outside of their own races, and outside the developed west. This is racepill due to racism, and also the way Arabs, paks, and Indians act

 

[Deleted member 27249]

Lol not if you're a woman sweetie

View attachment 332037

 

[Deleted member 23712]

Every category of trait that you can think of is illlegal to discimate against... except attractiveness.

If any liberal normie soy bluepill faggot lurker thinks they are in the right for denying the blackpill they need to come up with a reason why refusing to hire people based on the attractiveness of their faces and bone structure is a good thing, and why it is routinely used across nearly all facets of life.

What Is Unlawful Discrimination And How Do I Know If I’ve Been Discriminated Against?

Here we look at unlawful discrimination - the 9 protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 - and the 4 types of discrimination

www.truthlegal.com

The protected characteristics are

1. sex / gender
2. marital status (including civil partnership)
3. pregnancy and maternity
4. race, nationality or ethnic / national origins (includes skin colour)
5. religion or belief
6. disability
7. age
8. sexual orientation
9. gender reassignment

No, attractiveness is not on this list, which means its legal and acceptible practice.

Ofc it’s legal, holes do it all the time

 

[Uglymuggly]

A cold and brutal blackpill, once again the reality is as clear as day.

 

[your personality]

But a way can be found. In curryland it's illegal to discriminate on skin colour, because otherwise the lightskinned Aryans mog the shitskins too much, and colour is hard to define too.

Agree it's not straightforward, but as the world moves from 80-20 rule to 99-1 and soon 99.9-0.1, it is going to get ever more important.

One approach might be reservations /AA/ quotas for ugly, short, fat, stupid, dark skin people. These generally do work with resetting social norms and mobility, the problem is they get corrupted, and don't get removed when they were supposed to.

Everything you say is true, yes 10% of Nordic and meds are good looking Vs 0.001% of rice and curry men, but racism and lookism are separate.

Firstly, stormfronters will push their muh white race agenda regardless of how the ethnic looks, probably go harder against the good looking ethnic as he's a bigger perceived threat than the ugly, study maxxed, introvert.

Secondly while race pill and lookism are highly correlated, there is always am additional coefficient for race. Roshan, Abraham, Borkan, Fawad khan, Naqvi all have the SMV of a 3/10 JBW outside of their own races, and outside the developed west. This is racepill due to racism, and also the way Arabs, paks, and Indians act

Imo even though stormfronters might go after good looking ethnics with more malice it still might be rooted in lookism because of the way they dislike the good looking ethnic's skin color not being white and not having the bright eye light or medium dark hair that Europeans have.

Overtime yeah ethnic males have for a variety of reasons been penalized for their looks just because of being rice, curry or sand in a way that transcends how good looking objectively they may look. There is a cultural aspect to the racepill but it is inextricably linked to how rice, curry and sand males look compared to white males. Even if rice, curry and sand males were to change their culture it wouldn't do them any good because what others are really objecting to is the way they look and the kind of presence and smell (or lack thereof) that they impose on others.

 

[PPEcel]

Imo even though stormfronters might go after good looking ethnics with more malice it still might be rooted in lookism because of the way they dislike the good looking ethnic's skin color not being white and not having the bright eye light or medium dark hair that Europeans have.

Overtime yeah ethnic males have for a variety of reasons been penalized for their looks just because of being rice, curry or sand in a way that transcends how good looking objectively they may look. There is a cultural aspect to the racepill but it is inextricably linked to how rice, curry and sand males look compared to white males. Even if rice, curry and sand males were to change their culture it wouldn't do them any good because what others are really objecting to is the way they look and the kind of presence and smell (or lack thereof) that they impose on others.

I don't understand why the in"cel"s on this forum give escortcels a harder time than they do Stormfront faggots -- the latter are every bit as lookist as femoids.

 

[your personality]

I don't understand why the in"cel"s on this forum give escortcels a harder time than they do Stormfront faggots -- the latter are every bit as lookist as femoids.

I guess it's just because not everyone lives in an area where escortceling is cheap and not illegal.
Also there are some ethnic male users here that sympathsize with stormfrontcels because they have seen how diversity and multiculturalism has largely been a failure for ethnic males to the benefit of white males and ethnic females. There are also other users who see the self proclaimed anti-racist social justice left as in general the main group going after incels. But if you've seen the discussions on MRA and mgtow boards many conservative tradcucks would also crack down on incels if they had the power to do so but it isn't that apparent right now so to many people here stormfronters are the lesser of evils.

 

[PPEcel]

I guess it's just because not everyone lives in an area where escortceling is cheap and not illegal.
Also there are some ethnic male users here that sympathsize with stormfrontcels because they have seen how diversity and multiculturalism has largely been a failure for ethnic males to the benefit of white males and ethnic females. There are also other users who see the self proclaimed anti-racist social justice left as in general the main group going after incels. But if you've seen the discussions on MRA and mgtow boards many conservative tradcucks would also crack down on incels if they had the power to do so but it isn't that apparent right now so to many people here stormfronters are the lesser of evils.

Those fuckers don't just think "Stormfronters are the lesser of evils", they're dyed-in-the-wool honorary niggers who unironically have shit personalities.

 

[TheHopefulBeliever]

A cold and brutal blackpill, once again the reality is as clear as day.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Normies have no empathy. They need to be told what to think. They need to be told what is good and bad so they can virtue signal about stuff. They need to be told that discriminating based on looks is bad.

I've said this before ik but one time I was with a teacher after I beat up someone who bullied me and she asked why (he was making jokes about my face and Makin fun of me being ugly) and the teacher laughed and dismissed it and none of my bullies were given any punishment whatsoever

we should have our attractiveness rated by AI, and then see if the distribution in the company matches that of the general population. If it doesn't, we need attractiveness quotas like race quotas.

 

[MaxZM98]

looks are in the eye of the beholder bro

 

[Deleted member 22572]

looks are in the eye of the beholder bro

Wtf does that even mean? When normies say that what do they mean?

 

[MaxZM98]

Wtf does that even mean? When normies say that what do they mean?

they mean beauty is subjective, i.e: it depends on who's judging whether you are good looking or not. there's no such thing as objetively good looking.

 

[Neggr]

Lol not if you're a woman sweetie

View attachment 332037

Just be foid

 

[grondilu]

It is, because aesthetics is difficult to measure, and thus aesthetics discrimination is almost impossible to prove in court, and laws against it are very hard to enforce.

On second thought though, it seems to me that race is difficult to assess too. There are so many mixed-race people that the lines are very blurry. After all, this is the very argument some people make to claim the mere concept of race does not exist (which is ironic btw, if race doesn't exist, why such a fuss about it ?).

I would even go as far as saying that the concepts overlap. A mixed-race person can be aesthetically pleasing, but because his appearance doesn't conform to conventional beauty imposed by racial stereotypes, he will be treated exactly as if he were ugly. I'm mixed-race myself and I don't consider myself ugly though, so I am biased, ngl.

 

[FUCKITALLREEE]

Normies have no empathy. They need to be told what to think. They need to be told what is good and bad so they can virtue signal about stuff. They need to be told that discriminating based on looks is bad.

I've said this before ik but one time I was with a teacher after I beat up someone who bullied me and she asked why (he was making jokes about my face and Makin fun of me being ugly) and the teacher laughed and dismissed it and none of my bullies were given any punishment whatsoever

ERfuel ngl.

 

[Deleted member 24529]

I suppose one barrier to legally crack down on discrimination against subhumans like us is that ugliness is harder to define, whereas all of those other protected classes are pretty straightforward.

1. Not really if you are into lookism
2. Whatever they would look like, bullying and disciminating for looks would be treated the same way as discriminating agains weekend gays and raging homos is treated, the same

 

[CrackingYs]

looks are in the eye of the beholder bro

But attractiveness is easily testable. For example, just post a Tinder profile and count the number of matches.

 

[MaxZM98]

But attractiveness is easily testable. For example, just post a Tinder profile and count the number of matches.

hey sweetie if you don't get matches on tinder it's because you just took a bad picture. also women get more matches than men because they are just better picture-takers than men!

 

[PPEcel]

1. Not really if you are into lookism

Point is that that is harder to define than race or disability or gender.

 

[Deleted member 24529]

Point is that that is harder to define than race or disability or gender.

Barely. There were threads about a research that proved that foids for example need something like 12 miliseconds to tell if a man is ugly or not.

 

[grondilu]

One thing about discrimination, is that I've always thought it was something that is prohibited for the law makers, not for individuals.

By this I mean that we're all supposed to be equal before the Law : no Law can ever explicitly mention inherent characteristics, or be applied differently depending of such characteristics.

But apparently that's not enough. Not only we're supposed to be equal before the Law, but we're also supposed to treat each other equally. It's not just the Law that is regulated to prevent discrimination, it's human behavior in its entirety.

I guess there are good reasons for that. Discrimination, even when it's not explicitly enforced by Law, can be just as powerful if it's sufficiently prevalent. That's usually how minorities are persecuted wherever they are.

But FFS we should not go from one extreme to an other, to a point where we deny that any inherent characteristics should have any weight in social interactions. It seems even more insane to me. Especially if in order to counter discriminating behavioral trends, you make Law explicitly discriminatory, as with say affirmative action.

Take for instance "pregnancy and maternity" : a business owner should have the right not to hire a pregnant woman. He knows for a fact that she's going to take a maternity leave and that will cost him. It's just a reality, it's his business and he should not be forced to lose money over this.

 

[PPEcel]

Barely. There were threads about a research that proved that foids for example need something like 12 miliseconds to tell if a man is ugly or not.

You're missing the point. Of course attractiveness is measurable and can be defined. But it's just not as clear-cut as other protected classes (which are discrete variables)

 

[Deleted member 24529]

You're missing the point. Of course attractiveness is measurable and can be defined. But it's just not as clear-cut as other protected classes (which are discrete variables)

Only to the normies maybe because they have been living a lie.

 

[PPEcel]

Only to the normies maybe because they have been living a lie.

You are still missing the point.

 

[Deleted member 24529]

You are still missing the point.

No, I am not. You are implying that it's either physically more difficult to tell an ugly person from good/normal looking one which is totally not true. First of all on first glance you can tell if someone is ugly, 2nd of all, all the physical attributes that make person ugly are also possible to point out each time. Only bluepilled copers deny this.

 

[PPEcel]

No, I am not. You are implying that it's either physically more difficult to tell an ugly person from good/normal looking one which is totally not true. First of all on first glance you can tell if someone is ugly, 2nd of all, all the physical attributes that make person ugly are also possible to point out each time. Only bluepilled copers deny this.

I'm not talking about how physically difficult it is, I'm talking about how legally difficult it is.

 

[incels.REEEE]

Every category of trait that you can think of is illlegal to discimate against... except attractiveness.

If any liberal normie soy bluepill faggot lurker thinks they are in the right for denying the blackpill they need to come up with a reason why refusing to hire people based on the attractiveness of their faces and bone structure is a good thing, and why it is routinely used across nearly all facets of life.

What Is Unlawful Discrimination And How Do I Know If I’ve Been Discriminated Against?

Here we look at unlawful discrimination - the 9 protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 - and the 4 types of discrimination

www.truthlegal.com

The protected characteristics are

1. sex / gender
2. marital status (including civil partnership)
3. pregnancy and maternity
4. race, nationality or ethnic / national origins (includes skin colour)
5. religion or belief
6. disability
7. age
8. sexual orientation
9. gender reassignment

No, attractiveness is not on this list, which means its legal and acceptible practice.

Water is wet. Legal for anyone but socially acceptable to do to men only.

 

[Deleted member 24529]

I'm not talking about how physically difficult it is, I'm talking about how legally difficult it is.

Right, but in a blackpilled society it wouldn't have been.