it ain't adding up

[HONKLERedux]

How many British colonized India?


The Raj, in Hindi meaning 'to rule' or 'kingdom', was the colonial rule by the British Crown over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 to 1947. During the Raj, around 20,000 British officials and troops ruled over 300 million Indians.




So 20,000 British people over 100 hundreds years is ''invasion and subjection'', but millions of random shitskins and criminals flooding countries by the year isn't an invasion and is somehow just revenge?

@DarkStar

 

[HONKLERedux]

0

 

[kay']

Dnr

 

[HONKLERedux]

 

[DarkStar]

Trvth

All Whites ever did was what non-whites also did to their own people, other non-whites(ie; MENA in East Africa & India), and even Whites at times -such as the Mongols or MENA in Iberia & the Balkans- on a much more large & prosperous scale

The British Left India Richer Than They Found It - Unfortunately It Was Malthusian Growth

India's economy was more than twice the size as the British left than it had been when they arrived. Unfortunately, it was Malthusian growth, an increase in the number of people, not an increase in living standards. As with most economic growth across history, before an industrial revolution.

www.forbes.com

The whole "muh looted India/global south" is by in large, a myth. In fact, they helped many places grow, though in all fairness this was Malthusian which really has just shot us(and Rices also) in the foot.

And then when you add on the fact a lot of the sub-continent was by in large self-governing through princely states:

A princely state (also called native state) was semi-independent and a nominally sovereign[1] entity of British Raj that was not directly governed by the British, but rather by an indigenous ruler under a form of indirect rule,[2] subject to a subsidiary alliance and the suzerainty or paramountcy of the British Crown.

At the time of the British withdrawal, 565 princely states were officially recognized in the Indian Subcontinent,[3] apart from thousands of zamindari estates and jagirs. In 1947, princely states covered 40% of the area of pre-independence India and constituted 23% of its population.[

Princely state - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The whole dogshit thesis of "muh colonialism" "muh immigration as revenge" crumbles

@Koomersarj

 

[DarkStar]

Dnr

What do you actually think of the argument though?

 

[Fluoxymesterone]

watER

 

[kay']

What do you actually think of the argument though?

These shitskins and indians are coming to your own country through the acceptance and greetings of your own governmental laws, most of them work also they arent refugees.

Nobody is forcing uk to take all these foreigners in. Unless someone is really forcing them then idk.

Not comparable to the massacres britain did to those poor indians under colonization.

 

[VλREN]

Don’t think about it Saar

Anyway have you heard muh Ukrainian democracy???

 

[fedded]

All Whites ever did was what non-whites also did to their own people