Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Is zoophillia cucked?

Akhnai

Akhnai

Christian Incel
-
Joined
Feb 14, 2019
Posts
1,321
"I have sex everyday and i am not a chad! Blackpill debunked!"
images

t Zoophilist boasting about how he had sex everyday-with his pet

Jokes aside,are these animal rapists cucked?
On one hand,men coping with animals,just like men coping with porn or homosexuality or trannyism,are content with the state of the anti-male world since they are sexually satisfied.

On the other hand,these people are absolutely mental and immoral,and some people here thinks that being an immoral degenerate means that you are "based" :feelsseriously:
And they are also some of the most low inhib people on Earth.So i guess that is based?

Thoughts
 
They're on the same level like gays and trannies
 
Raping innocent, defenseless animals instead of roasties who have every right to be raped and have not an ounce of innocence left in them is cucked, yes. Imagine if all the mentally ill copers like furries, pedos and trannies just started raping adult foids instead, the government would have no choice but to acknowledge the incel problem and help us get laid.

Note to FBI: wherever rape is discussed in this post, I'm referring to the act of committing rape in the videogame known as Minecraft. I do not endorse any real-life criminal activity.
 
Zoophilia is just as disgusting as pedophilia, wether you are a woman, a man, whatever, it's disgusting.
 
I think zoophiles are incels who finally snapped and said "fuck it, pussy is pussy" and then went off to fuck a horse.
I personally don't give a shit about animal rights so I would really care if it became legal in the next 20 years.
Knowing how humans are, it'll be legal in 10 years.
But I'd never do it, animals carry disease and I don't want to be patient zero for the next Spanish Flu.
 
zoophilia is repulsive, it is not hygienic and rudely disgusting, and with it all the furry aesthetics that are repulsively bestialized and filthy disgusting, and this is separate from the question of whether it is "cucked" or not, as it is a matter of having a vigorous and noble taste and a rotten taste like zoophilia which is horrible, because attraction to nonhuman animals is repulsive
Zoophilia is just as disgusting as pedophilia, wether you are a woman, a man, whatever, it's disgusting.
define "pedophilia", and how are both things the same? nothing against your point, is your personal, it's just an informative reply
 
Last edited:
"I have sex everyday and i am not a chad! Blackpill debunked!"
images

t Zoophilist boasting about how he had sex everyday-with his pet

Jokes aside,are these animal rapists cucked?
On one hand,men coping with animals,just like men coping with porn or homosexuality or trannyism,are content with the state of the anti-male world since they are sexually satisfied.

On the other hand,these people are absolutely mental and immoral,and some people here thinks that being an immoral degenerate means that you are "based" :feelsseriously:
And they are also some of the most low inhib people on Earth.So i guess that is based?

Thoughts
My dog sucked my cock faggot, fuck you
 
Fucking animals is kinda going too far if you ask me

Bad1
 
The overwhelming majority of men who have sex with animals are having sex with male animals. Straight men really don't fuck animals, it's mostly gays, bisexuals and trannies. They mostly fuck male dogs and occasionally male horses. Members of the lgbtq are more likely to be into it than straight men. There are studies that show that both men and women both prefer to fuck male animals. Just go through this online meetup thread on a zoophile site asking local people from Toronto to get in touch with their sexual interest. Just count how many of the men are either gay, bi or transsexuals. It's like 90 percent of them. One guy identifies as "straight" and then in the same sentence says that he likes to bottom for male dogs. The straight guys just want to watch a girl with a dog and not actually touch or fuck the dog them self.
 
Last edited:
The overwhelming majority of men who have sex with animals are having sex with male animals. Straight men really don't fuck animals, it's mostly gays, bisexuals and trannies. They mostly fuck male dogs and occasionally male horses. Members of the lgbtq are more likely to be into it than straight men. There are studies that show that both men and women both prefer to fuck male animals. Just go through this online meetup thread on a zoophile site asking local people from Toronto to get in touch with their sexual interest. Just count how many of the men are either gay, bi or transsexuals. It's like 90 percent of them. One guy identifies as "straight" and then in the same sentence says that he likes to bottom for male dogs. The straight guys just want to watch a girl with a dog and not actually touch or fuck the dog them self.

Good info. I remember thinking it was weird that the gay aspect was never covered in the Catholic priests scandals. It was always "child" or "sex" abuse, but never just "gay rape." It seems like the conspiracy theory about a gay or gay/jew "illuminati" might have some merit.
 
zoophilia is repulsive, it is not hygienic and rudely disgusting, and with it all the furry aesthetics that are repulsively bestialized and filthy disgusting, and this is separate from the question of whether it is "cucked" or not, as it is a matter of having a vigorous and noble taste and a rotten taste like zoophilia which is horrible, because attraction to nonhuman animals is repulsive

define "pedophilia", and how are both things the same? nothing against your point, is your personal, it's just an informative reply
Both is sexual contact with someone/something that cannot consent, therefore both is disgusting.
 
Evil shit, mental illness.
You have problems if you are fucking your pet.
 
It's pretty disgusting.
 
Both is sexual contact with someone/something that cannot consent, therefore both is disgusting.
what is "pedophilia" then? In my concept, zoophilia is disgusting because nonhuman animals are disgusting and gross, having relationships with disgusting beings like nonhuman animals is disgusting and unhygienic, beastly disapproving, is repulsive and "disgusting" in the literal sense, is gross, although I don't frame the other thing as disgusting for various reasons; so this is your definition of "disgusting", but do you really care about the consent of foids, hence foids? all right then, it's a form of conformation and compassion with these beings that end up degenerate and whores one way or another, your culture: But what is "pedophilia"? The concept of pedophilia is subjective, so is just information
 
This is the only way zoophilia could be accepted.
DVWiwsG
 
Raping innocent, defenseless animals instead of roasties who have every right to be raped and have not an ounce of innocence left in them is cucked, yes. Imagine if all the mentally ill copers like furries, pedos and trannies just started raping adult foids instead, the government would have no choice but to acknowledge the incel problem and help us get laid.

Note to FBI: wherever rape is discussed in this post, I'm referring to the act of committing rape in the videogame known as Minecraft. I do not endorse any real-life criminal activity.

This is a good point. Animals are innocent, as they lack evil. For example, if an animal kills, its because he wants food or something. Animals don't kill out of evil. Only humans kill out of spite and evil. Humans deserve to be destroyed.
 
Zoophilia is a cope, and it works for some.

ngl some animal pussies are toyable tbh

Have you ever saw a horse pussy ?

Looks good af boyo
 
Last edited:
what is "pedophilia" then? In my concept, zoophilia is disgusting because nonhuman animals are disgusting and gross, having relationships with disgusting beings like nonhuman animals is disgusting and unhygienic, beastly disapproving, is repulsive and "disgusting" in the literal sense, is gross, although I don't frame the other thing as disgusting for various reasons; so this is your definition of "disgusting", but do you really care about the consent of foids, hence foids? all right then, it's a form of conformation and compassion with these beings that end up degenerate and whores one way or another, your culture: But what is "pedophilia"? The concept of pedophilia is subjective, so is just information
Pedophilia is not just about touching little girls, but also about touching boys and it goes both ways, dont forget that.
I've seen what pedophilia does to people, and I don't wish it upon anyone. Imo if someone wants to fuck animals or kids, there is something wrong with them
 
Last edited:
Pedophilia is not just about touching little girls, but also about touching boys and it goes both ways, dont forget that.
I was specific about the topic of pedophilia in little girls; And honestly, there's no plausible reason to condemn pedophilia because it "causes trauma in a girl," or literally in a foid: They don't care what they do or did to you, and since they are young, they have the same cheeky, negative nature (and the opposite also varies from personal opinion, so whatever); well, "wrong" and "right" are relative and they are variable constructs, they are mere pieces of speech and rhetoric, but I understand what you mean by that and I am not saying that you are necessarily wrong; This reply of mine is not meant to be against your opinion, but just to make room for a better elaboration on things
 
Last edited:
This is a good point. Animals are innocent, as they lack evil. For example, if an animal kills, its because he wants food or something. Animals don't kill out of evil. Only humans kill out of spite and evil. Humans deserve to be destroyed.
What about dolphins and chimps?
 
What about dolphins and chimps?
They kill, but again it is not out of spite. It is to attract mates, get food and territory. Humans hurt others out of spite, even when they cannot benefit.
 
They kill, but again it is not out of spite. It is to attract mates, get food and territory. Humans hurt others out of spite, even when they cannot benefit.
some more intelligent animals do this too, they're fucked. even chickens attack the weak for no good reason
 
The concept of pedophilia is subjective, so is just information
That is not true lel.Pedophilia means sexual attraction to people who are yet able to develop primary genital characteristics.

There is nothing subjective about that.One might even argue that there is nothing subjective in denouncing pedophilia as evil because pedophilic acts is by nature sterile and counter productive to human evolution
 
This is a good point. Animals are innocent, as they lack evil. For example, if an animal kills, its because he wants food or something. Animals don't kill out of evil. Only humans kill out of spite and evil. Humans deserve to be destroyed.
Only human foids are truly capable of evil.
 
they are giant copers, human female pussy or death
 
idk but its weird and disgusting tbh
 
Note to FBI: wherever rape is discussed in this post, I'm referring to the act of committing rape in the videogame known as Minecraft. I do not endorse any real-life criminal activity.
kek
 

Similar threads

Jailbaitmaxxer
Replies
6
Views
211
Kinkcel1
Kinkcel1
DefeatedIncel
Replies
14
Views
542
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah
FuckNoNutNovember
Replies
45
Views
460
FuckNoNutNovember
FuckNoNutNovember
TheJester
Replies
3
Views
203
Balding Subhuman
Balding Subhuman
joocel52
Replies
13
Views
172
joocel52
joocel52

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top