Is the LMS theory right or wrong?

[Salustio]

LMS Theory

Women are attracted to men with LMS - Looks, Money and Status.

lmstheory.wordpress.com

I have noticed that most incels don't even know what LMS is, that is extremely sad. Someone may say "M&S are only useful to get prostitution-tier relationships", which is absolutely false, proven to be false by both the redpill and even more by the blackpill.

When we are talking about physical attractiveness, we have to consider a lot of variables. What I am asking now, is: Is the LMS theory good or bad? I don't know where the stats come from, but I see no flaws in it, it looks legit to me. I want to ask you if you can disprove the LMS, because I can't.

It's a mix. But of course the face is what matters the most, we are talking about physical attractiveness afterall. Inferring that physical attractiveness is what create couples is not in the LMS theory, because, it's about physical attractiveness, it's not a theory which explains you how couples are created, it only explains you what are the known variables behind the process we call "physical attractiveness". And what's wrong about LMS? I think it's a legit theory, even if it's a PUA theory.

Can you please disprove the LMS if you disagree? Thanks.

 

[Deleted member 15752]

You only need looks to be sure a female is with you for "who you are". If not then money and status means shes with you for materialistic reasons.

In reality its just L

 

[Barnacle]

How can it be wrong?

I mean you could get women with only one of those letters but put together you are the ultimate slayer.

 

[Modus Coperandi]

it's a mathematical paradox, because both money and status are unlimited, while looks aren't.

In reality its just L

 

[Salustio]

You only need looks to be sure a female is with you for "who you are". If not then money and status means shes with you for materialistic reasons.

In reality its just L

Ok, but I want a clear explanation, because I thought that the blackpill was right. But now you came here to tell me that blackpill is completely wrong. I ask: how?

it's a mathematical paradox, because both money and status are unlimited, while looks aren't.

Good point. So, the LMS chart can be disproven? With your premise, I think that maybe we can find a loophole in the LMS.

 

[Deleted member 15752]

Ok, but I want a clear explanation, because I thought that the blackpill was right. But now you came here to tell me that blackpill is completely wrong. I ask: how?

Dude what are you even saying? How did you even come with the thought that my statement leads to the conclusion that the blackpill is wrong?

Both Looks, Money and Status get you laid. But if you are sub 5 and you have money and status you can 100% be sure she is with you just for your money and fame.

 

[sub8male]

LMS Theory

Women are attracted to men with LMS - Looks, Money and Status.

lmstheory.wordpress.com

I have noticed that most incels don't even know what LMS is, that is extremely sad. Someone may say "M&S are only useful to get prostitution-tier relationships", which is absolutely false, proven to be false by both the redpill and even more by the blackpill.

When we are talking about physical attractiveness, we have to consider a lot of variables. What I am asking now, is: Is the LMS theory good or bad? I don't know where the stats come from, but I see no flaws in it, it looks legit to me. I want to ask you if you can disprove the LMS, because I can't.

It's a mix. But of course the face is what matters the most, we are talking about physical attractiveness afterall. Inferring that physical attractiveness is what create couples is not in the LMS theory, because, it's about physical attractiveness, it's not a theory which explains you how couples are created, it only explains you what are the known variables behind the process we call "physical attractiveness". And what's wrong about LMS? I think it's a legit theory, even if it's a PUA theory.

Can you please disprove the LMS if you disagree? Thanks.

LMS is legit but looks are first and foremost. Money and status matter but looks are DEFINITELY the most important.

 

[Salustio]

Both Looks, Money and Status get you laid.

But we are talking about physical attraction, BRO.

And both LMS and the redpill and the blackpill showed us that M&S are part of the equation, regarding the subject of "physical attractiveness".

So, can you disprove it?

 

[BRCel123]

Looks over anything

 

[Player]

LMS

 

[Ugly_equals_Death]

Looks, looks, looks

 

[Deleted member 18214]

You only need looks to be sure a female is with you for "who you are". If not then money and status means shes with you for materialistic reasons.

In reality its just L

 

[PollockCel]

You can get a woman sexually atracted to you through M&S but you have to be a rapper or some sort of a youtuber, some famous person, with looks you dont have to be Brad pitt to be able to attract a female. Just some guy with 200 likes on facebook will do. What i am saying is that all the true atraction that comes from L trumps all the true atraction that comes from M and S combined.

 

[Hate_my_life]

You only need looks to be sure a female is with you for "who you are". If not then money and status means shes with you for materialistic reasons.

In reality its just L

 

[Dregster]

Ok, but I want a clear explanation, because I thought that the blackpill was right. But now you came here to tell me that blackpill is completely wrong. I ask: how?

Good point. So, the LMS chart can be disproven? With your premise, I think that maybe we can find a loophole in the LMS.

What exactly are you asking here?

Looks
Money
Status

In that order determines what is available to you. If you have none, you get nothing.

Looks and your general image opens the door for you, everything else determines where you stand and what you can get.

With money and status, it's possible for a 6/10 man to beat out an 8/10 man who doesn't have the same income.

 

[Glokta]

You either buy women with your face, or you have to pay them with your money.

 

[Deleted member 16455]

L is the most important. i guess you can compensate with money or status, but you will eventually get cucked

 

[Salustio]

What exactly are you asking here?

At least you read the LMS theory, that's something most incels never did.

 

[Dregster]

At least you read the LMS theory, that's something most incels never did.

It's necessary knowledge for someone who seeks to improve their standard of living.

 

[needsolution]

i dont have strong opinion on this