Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

IS LIBERTARIANISM REALLY JEWISH MENTAL SYPHILIS?

  • Thread starter Racial-Identitarian
  • Start date
Racial-Identitarian

Racial-Identitarian

EASTEURASIAN-IDENTITARIAN TKE Enjoyer
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Posts
6,868

Libertarianism
(A) The reality is that Libertarianism covers a fairly broad range of approaches for determining the ideal relationship of the individual to society.

(B) The most extreme form of Libertarianism is very little more than Anarchism under another name. Under extreme Libertarianism, the individual should not be restricted in any way whatsoever for whatever the reason.

(C) Most commonly though, Libertarians will espouse the idea of Laisse-Faire Capitalism as being fundamental to their ideology. When Libertarians speak of "Free markets" what they are really promoting is the unrestrained operation of market forces as being the ideal state of society. The quintessential and most well-known proponent of Libertarianism and Libertarian-adjacent thinking around "Free Markets" was the Jew whose real name was Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum. Alisa Rosembaum was commonly known by the pennames "Ayn Rand" and "Alice O'Connor."

So, common Libertarianism is fundamentally a product of the Jewish mind. Government under this Libertarian philosophy has only one function, and this function is to guarantee the unrestrained play of Market Forces. The unrestrained hegemony of "Market Forces" bearing down on all members of a society is also referred to as "Social-Hypergamy."

Social Hypergamy is an economic dog-eat-dog war of all against all. Libertarianism is just the proverbial governance by Law of the Jungle while people are dwelling in the midst of unrestrained capitalism. The Survival of the Fittest being the end result of Libertarianism. Survival of the Fittest within a Libertarian context is determined by who has the most accumulated wealth and all of the power and prestige that this wealth brings.

In the middle of this Libertarian free-for-all for dominance that takes place among the monied aristocracy, you will see the rich and powerful pool their resources against the middle class and the working class when the situation demands, and this unionization of the upper classes is done in order to keep those with less money in bondage and producing more wealth for the nobility.

Obviously, any Libertarian Society is also going to be highly unstable by its very nature as well as being an absolute anathema to such things as family life, tribes, clans, and racial survival. Libertarianism stands against such things as family life, tribes, and clans, plus Libertarianism stands against racial consciousness because all of these things serve to seriously impede the unrestrained play of market forces that are so beloved by Laisse-Faire Capitalists.

Among Jewicized Libertarians, individual selfishness is seen as not just one of many noble virtues, but instead, selfishness is seen as the Chief Virtue!

(D) The idea of "Ordered Liberty", and Centrist Libertarianism

The Libertarians who espouse the idea of "Ordered Liberty" recognize that Extreme Individualism only guarantees the disintegration of any organized human society. The concept of "Ordered Liberty" simply means that there should be no laws except for those laws that are essential for maintaining an organized society; however, this very limited list of laws must be given iron teeth and these rules need to be strictly enforced if society is to function at all. These "Centrist Libertarians" as they are sometimes called (Centrist meaning Moderate) are viewed as traitors by the more radical Libertarian elements.

1728086172527




1728086527015


1728086540881


THESE "MODERATE" LIBERTARISNS ARE OFTEN CALLED FASCISTS BY MORE RADICAL LIBERTARIANS!! Thing is, this more radical Libertarian way of looking at things is not without a certain amount of merit because these "Centrist Libertarians" consider that the survival of ones Folk has to always take precedence over ones rights as an individual.

"Ordered Liberty" is, and will always be, what The Great One intends for His Folk and those who are aligned with his Folk. When you see members of The Party and the SS talking about fighting for Freedom and Liberty for the German Folk, this is what they are referring to.

When you see National Socialists speaking of themselves as a Democratic Movement, what they are referring to is the idea that The German Folk, who are acting as a Folk, will govern themselves by acting through the NSDAP itself. For National Socialists, Adolf Hitler is their Permanent Leader whom they have freely chosen to lead and speak for them. True Democracy ("Rule by the People") is not this Jewish Counterfeit Democracy that we are currently forced to languish under (where rule by the people means rule by the Jews and their money).​
 
@AsiaCel
@DarkStar
 
Many 20th century political philosophies do, in fact, have Jewish roots in the Frankfurt School, but Libertarianism is not one of them.
 
>if you dont like authoritarianism ur a jooooo!!!!
 
I mean libertarianism as such is a jewish philosophy, especially things like ayn rand's objectivism

but some libertarians are just libertarian because they're pedophiles and want to revoke age of consent laws

and I have no quarrel with those ones
 

Libertarianism
(A) The reality is that Libertarianism covers a fairly broad range of approaches for determining the ideal relationship of the individual to society.

(B) The most extreme form of Libertarianism is very little more than Anarchism under another name. Under extreme Libertarianism, the individual should not be restricted in any way whatsoever for whatever the reason.

(C) Most commonly though, Libertarians will espouse the idea of Laisse-Faire Capitalism as being fundamental to their ideology. When Libertarians speak of "Free markets" what they are really promoting is the unrestrained operation of market forces as being the ideal state of society. The quintessential and most well-known proponent of Libertarianism and Libertarian-adjacent thinking around "Free Markets" was the Jew whose real name was Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum. Alisa Rosembaum was commonly known by the pennames "Ayn Rand" and "Alice O'Connor."

So, common Libertarianism is fundamentally a product of the Jewish mind. Government under this Libertarian philosophy has only one function, and this function is to guarantee the unrestrained play of Market Forces. The unrestrained hegemony of "Market Forces" bearing down on all members of a society is also referred to as "Social-Hypergamy."

Social Hypergamy is an economic dog-eat-dog war of all against all. Libertarianism is just the proverbial governance by Law of the Jungle while people are dwelling in the midst of unrestrained capitalism. The Survival of the Fittest being the end result of Libertarianism. Survival of the Fittest within a Libertarian context is determined by who has the most accumulated wealth and all of the power and prestige that this wealth brings.

In the middle of this Libertarian free-for-all for dominance that takes place among the monied aristocracy, you will see the rich and powerful pool their resources against the middle class and the working class when the situation demands, and this unionization of the upper classes is done in order to keep those with less money in bondage and producing more wealth for the nobility.

Obviously, any Libertarian Society is also going to be highly unstable by its very nature as well as being an absolute anathema to such things as family life, tribes, clans, and racial survival. Libertarianism stands against such things as family life, tribes, and clans, plus Libertarianism stands against racial consciousness because all of these things serve to seriously impede the unrestrained play of market forces that are so beloved by Laisse-Faire Capitalists.

Among Jewicized Libertarians, individual selfishness is seen as not just one of many noble virtues, but instead, selfishness is seen as the Chief Virtue!

(D) The idea of "Ordered Liberty", and Centrist Libertarianism

The Libertarians who espouse the idea of "Ordered Liberty" recognize that Extreme Individualism only guarantees the disintegration of any organized human society. The concept of "Ordered Liberty" simply means that there should be no laws except for those laws that are essential for maintaining an organized society; however, this very limited list of laws must be given iron teeth and these rules need to be strictly enforced if society is to function at all. These "Centrist Libertarians" as they are sometimes called (Centrist meaning Moderate) are viewed as traitors by the more radical Libertarian elements.

View attachment 1284203



View attachment 1284207

View attachment 1284208

THESE "MODERATE" LIBERTARISNS ARE OFTEN CALLED FASCISTS BY MORE RADICAL LIBERTARIANS!! Thing is, this more radical Libertarian way of looking at things is not without a certain amount of merit because these "Centrist Libertarians" consider that the survival of ones Folk has to always take precedence over ones rights as an individual.

"Ordered Liberty" is, and will always be, what The Great One intends for His Folk and those who are aligned with his Folk. When you see members of The Party and the SS talking about fighting for Freedom and Liberty for the German Folk, this is what they are referring to.

When you see National Socialists speaking of themselves as a Democratic Movement, what they are referring to is the idea that The German Folk, who are acting as a Folk, will govern themselves by acting through the NSDAP itself. For National Socialists, Adolf Hitler is their Permanent Leader whom they have freely chosen to lead and speak for them. True Democracy ("Rule by the People") is not this Jewish Counterfeit Democracy that we are currently forced to languish under (where rule by the people means rule by the Jews and their money).​
Libertarianism doesn't work, and even neoliberalism doesn't work. Adam Smith's laws on free competition in the market worked only in the 18th century, when there was no such thing as megacorporations. Today, in order for you to buy, you will give money to the same corporations that may have dozens of soda brands, but the profit will go to one place. If you adapt the laws of the jungle, you will get Latin America, where there have always been either very rich or very poor and there has always been instability due to right-wing military juntas and left-wing communist guerrillas.
 
Libertarianism is complete opposite of anarchism. Anarchism actually requires communist economy, but libertarianism is basically just ultra-capitalism where rich people literally become gods and control every aspect of the lifes of the poor people.

Libertarianism = ultra totalitarism
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top