Is it true that feminists raised the age of consent to 16 - 18 in order to punish low SMV males?

[dingopuss]

The age of consent in the USA is currently 16, 17, or 18 with laws that apply to minors under 16 or 17.

"Minor" can apply to boys but for all intents and purposes, this is about girls.

I'm not a pedocel, but damn, many if not ~50-60% of foids are sexually active at 14 or 15, yet apparently they don't know what they're doing until 16-18 depending on the state.

For example, in Cuckfornia, the age of consent is 18, with it being a felony if the defendant is over 21 and the minor is under 16. Do you know how many young teens (13-15) intentionally seduce older men? The based part is, if she appears over 18 due to her slutty outfit, fakeup, or "maturity" then Chad walks away scot free, according to the law. I bet that legal defense twists foids' panties in a knot. It triggers PMS, and menopause.

I read that the reason the aoc in Cuckfornicata is 18 instead of 16 like most states is because feminists raised it. This all makes perfect sense. They always try to expand the definiton of rape. Why not make 17 year old post-puberty foids innocent little girls, and furthermore make us believe drunken sex is rape because foid brains completely shut down with miniscule amounts of ethanol, or it's rape because foids are better at lying, when the "she's a minor" card is no longer valid.

However, if you search for statutory "rape" cases, you will never find Chad in orange. All you'll see is ugly men. This tells you that the law punishes ugly men, not actual predators. They made the Yautja hideous for a reason.

 

[Deleted member 1042]

They are fucking ridiculous. I think I read somewhere once brain doesn't fully mature til' age 25. So why stop at some arbitrary number like 18? Why not just go all the way up to 25? Knowing them, they'll do this.

 

[frustratedhapa]

Yes, they did. But I don't really disagree with the age of consent being that high tbh. I actually agree with @BrendioEEE that it should be raised to 25 unless the people get married. If I had a daughter, I wouldn't want her to be able to have sex while she was still in high school and living under my roof, and i would want anyone who fucks her and turns her into a slut to be punished.

 

[dingopuss]

Yes, they did. But I don't really disagree with the age of consent being that high tbh. I actually agree with @BrendioEEE that it should be raised to 25 unless the people get married. If I had a daughter, I wouldn't want her to be able to have sex while she was still in high school and living under my roof, and i would want anyone who fucks her and turns her into a slut to be punished.

That's the best reason to be honest, but the law wouldn't punish Chad fucking your daughter, would it?

They are fucking ridiculous. I think I read somewhere once brain doesn't fully mature til' age 25. So why stop at some arbitrary number like 18? Why not just go all the way up to 25? Knowing them, they'll do this.

Fully developed doesn't apply to everything. Do you have to be 25 to understand that sex can lead to children? Of course not.

 

[frustratedhapa]

That's the best reason to be honest, but the law wouldn't punish Chad fucking your daughter, would it?

Chad would be castrated if he statutory raped someone in my ideal society

 

[dingopuss]

Chad would be castrated if he statutory raped someone in my ideal society

In my ideal society the age of consent would be 18 for practical reasons (legal rights at 18) but if it's 16 everywhere else with little to no degeneracy, then it would be 16. The fact that it's 16 in most states and 18 in others doesn't really make any sense. Either 16, 17, or 18, pick one, legislators. It should be federal law based on biological evidence, not pick and choose.

Since the US wants to protect all its daughters then I believe it should be federal law. When it's up to the states, you get the impression that maturity depends solely on your statehood - when two 17 year olds aren't mature enough for each other in California but 14 year olds are mature enough to get fucked by their 18 year old Chads in (insert state).

 

[frustratedhapa]

In my ideal society the age of consent would be 18 for practical reasons (legal rights at 18) but if it's 16 everywhere else with little to no degeneracy, then it would be 16. The fact that it's 16 in most states and 18 in others doesn't really make any sense. Either 16, 17, or 18, pick one, legislators. It should be federal law based on biological evidence, not pick and choose.

I don't think teenagers should be having sex tbh. If someone still lives at home under their parent's roof, and they have a curfew, and they are not legally allowed to have medical procedures done without parental consent, and they are not allowed to smoke, drink, vote, or join the military, then I don't think they should be allowed to have sex. Sure, teens may be biologically ready to have sex, but they are not mature enough to deal with the consequences. I wouldn't want my teen daughter to be ravaged by tons of Chads because she has poor judgement and then later regret it and cry #MeToo and act like she's some kind of victim. I wouldn't want my teen daughter to get pregnant and then I'd have to pay money to raise her mistake child. etc etc etc. Sex should be treated as something only responsible adults do.

 

[jackwolfskin999]

Yes

 

[NoCopeNoHope]

I don't think teenagers should be having sex tbh. If someone still lives at home under their parent's roof, and they have a curfew, and they are not legally allowed to have medical procedures done without parental consent, and they are not allowed to smoke, drink, vote, or join the military, then I don't think they should be allowed to have sex. Sure, teens may be biologically ready to have sex, but they are not mature enough to deal with the consequences. I wouldn't want my teen daughter to be ravaged by tons of Chads because she has poor judgement and then later regret it and cry #MeToo and act like she's some kind of victim. I wouldn't want my teen daughter to get pregnant and then I'd have to pay money to raise her mistake child. etc etc etc. Sex should be treated as something only responsible adults do.

This is prevented by keeping your daughter locked away from the public. The issue here is that females are required to go into enviroments that allow slut culture to form. Females should stop going to public school when they hit puberty, as middle school is where whores get their start.

The real overall problem is that technologic soceity has rendered many of these control mechanisms obsolete. Unless you live like the Amish or backwards tribals who shun technology, this shit will happen.

 

[Deleted member 19756]

Foids shouldn't be allowed to have sex outside of marriage. And can be married at 14. AOC started changing during the victorian era in England. Those cunts convinced our cunts to change it. I don't think older men should have sex with younger foids outside of marriage. But who values marriage and children anymore? Total fucking free for all! Do whatever the fuck you want.

 

[Deleted member 19236]

Not exactly. They did it to increase their own SMV by regulating the market.
It ended decreasing low SMV males value nevertheless, because more competition among males(Higher SMV winning ofc)

 

[dingopuss]

In my ideal society the age of consent would be 18 for practical reasons (legal rights at 18) but if it's 16 everywhere else with little to no degeneracy, then it would be 16. The fact that it's 16 in most states and 18 in others doesn't really make any sense. Either 16, 17, or 18, pick one, legislators.

I don't think teenagers should be having sex tbh. If someone still lives at home under their parent's roof, and they have a curfew, and they are not legally allowed to have medical procedures done without parental consent, and they are not allowed to smoke, drink, vote, or join the military, then I don't think they should be allowed to have sex. Sure, teens may be biologically ready to have sex, but they are not mature enough to deal with the consequences. I wouldn't want my teen daughter to be ravaged by tons of Chads because she has poor judgement and then later regret it and cry #MeToo and act like she's some kind of victim. I wouldn't want my teen daughter to get pregnant and then I'd have to pay money to raise her mistake child. etc etc etc. Sex should be treated as something only responsible adults do.

Ideally, but in reality many teenagers are having sex and as a result, having their own children. Even if we punish Chad for knocking up 15 year old Stacy, Stacy still has the legal right to give birth to that child. Forced abortion? Sounds degenerate. I mean, plenty of 15 year old girls can be "effective" parents but many can't. What do you think about bringing back chastity belts?

Not exactly. They did it to increase their own SMV by regulating the market.
It ended decreasing low SMV males value nevertheless, because more competition among males(Higher SMV winning ofc)

Notice how older foids always say younger foids (even over 18 but under 25) are stupid and too immature? They love to brag about being "mature" (used up) older women.

 

[needsolution]

yeah, feminist shit doing everything to destroy males, we are only true tower of fight with them

 

[chadlandic]

No it’s the radical feminists and left pushing pedo-sexuality shit. You don’t need a lower age of consent, if I was a father I’d like to be able to punish an older guy who fucked my young teenage daughter.

 

[Teutonic Knight]

The most ridiculous thing is not age of consent in itselt but the close-in-age exemptions aka Romeo and Juliet laws where a 14 year old can have sex with a 17 year old but not with, say, a 22 year old.

This law is basically forcing degeneracy and premarital sex on young people while at the same time portraying it as innocent child love that has to be protected by special laws.

If age of consent was 18 period (with no exceptions), this would effectively ban teenage love and it would actually improve the lives of incels.

Europe is still different though, it's mostly either 14 or 15 here. Some countries don't have close-in-age exemptions and it's technically illegal in some countries for two people who are 14 years old to have sex with each other. Unfortunately it's not enforced.

 

[dingopuss]

No it’s the radical feminists and left pushing pedo-sexuality shit. You don’t need a lower age of consent, if I was a father I’d like to be able to punish an older guy who fucked my young teenage daughter.

Actually if you do your research, you couldn't be any more wrong. The left wants to higher it. No matter what right wingers claim.

You're confusing LGBT rights with pedo rights.

No one wants their children to be used for sex, left or right wing. And pedophilia advocacy can be found on the 3rd side of the political TRIANGLE spectrum: the degenerates.

Remember, what makes you think it was leftist America when good old conservative America's age of consent was 10. Pedophilia knows neither right nor left, all it knows is degeneracy. But the feminists seem to infantilize teens who are clearly not the same as fucking 10 year olds.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

The age of consent in the USA is currently 16, 17, or 18 with laws that apply to minors under 16 or 17.

"Minor" can apply to boys but for all intents and purposes, this is about girls.

I'm not a pedocel, but damn, many if not ~50-60% of foids are sexually active at 14 or 15, yet apparently they don't know what they're doing until 16-18 depending on the state.

For example, in Cuckfornia, the age of consent is 18, with it being a felony if the defendant is over 21 and the minor is under 16. Do you know how many young teens (13-15) intentionally seduce older men? The based part is, if she appears over 18 due to her slutty outfit, fakeup, or "maturity" then Chad walks away scot free, according to the law. I bet that legal defense twists foids' panties in a knot. It triggers PMS, and menopause.

I read that the reason the aoc in Cuckfornicata is 18 instead of 16 like most states is because feminists raised it. This all makes perfect sense. They always try to expand the definiton of rape. Why not make 17 year old post-puberty foids innocent little girls, and furthermore make us believe drunken sex is rape because foid brains completely shut down with miniscule amounts of ethanol, or it's rape because foids are better at lying, when the "she's a minor" card is no longer valid.

However, if you search for statutory "rape" cases, you will never find Chad in orange. All you'll see is ugly men. This tells you that the law punishes ugly men, not actual predators. They made the Yautja hideous for a reason.

cUckSA is an imperialistic feminist shitland.
Age of consent here in Italy is 14

 

[dingopuss]

cUckSA is an imperialistic feminist shitland.
Age of consent here in Italy is 14

It doesn't matter, if you're an incel, all sex would be potential rape by force or rape of an unconscious victim, which carries a much longer sentence than statutory rape (unless the child is a preteen).
I wasn't saying it should be lowered, but 18 just seems a little high considering you don't have to be at least 18 to understand the consequences of sex. And the basis for raising it to 18, other than to protect minors, was to prevent ugly men in their late teens to early 20s from having sex with younger girls; a practice that was common and still is. Nowadays this point is moot since the whole dynamics of sex have changed.

My basis for making it 18 would be "it's not my kids, it's not my problem" philosophy, since teens are more likely to have unwanted kids, and in turn, are unwanted kids for parents.

Bastard prevention - Marriage is more important than age of consent, in case you DO have children, wanted or unwanted. But marriage doesn't mean a damn thing anymore. To sexually active readers who are lurking, if you want sexual pleasure, have oral sex or mutual masturbation. It's not degenerate compared to rampant abortion, the normalization of bastard children, and single motherhood.

 

[FinnCel]

OP is right.
14 year old girl can whore herself around while a man has to stay lonely

 

[dingopuss]

OP is right.
14 year old girl can whore herself around while a man has to stay lonely

Incels* not men.

Since Chad gets to rape toddlers apparently.

What's funny is leftists aren't the ones who condone that shit, it's foids. No man condones that shit, only a sickening number of foids will praise Chad despite being a mass murderer, child rapist, you name it.

Countless examples of serial killers/rapists being worshipped by foids.

14 year old Chads get to do much worse than whoring themselves around. Albeit, foids have the same immunity. They get punished, yeah, a greatly reduced punishment.

 

[Bangkok or bust]

It should be 14 to allow 21yo pubertycels some action. So, yes, its to punish late developing males who are behind their male peers (incel trait).

 

[Cuyen]

Yes

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

However, if you search for statutory "rape" cases, you will never find Chad in orange. All you'll see is ugly men. This tells you that the law punishes ugly men, not actual predators.

no ugliness/baldness, no problem

 

[dingopuss]

It should be 14 to allow 21yo pubertycels some action. So, yes, its to punish late developing males who are behind their male peers (incel trait).

Chances are, a 21 year old is more emotionally stable, regardless of a boyish appearance. 16-18 is ok I guess. The topic wasn't really about the number, it was more about the reasoning behind the laws, and why feminists wanted to raise it.

 

[Bangkok or bust]

Chances are, a 21 year old is more emotionally stable, regardless of a boyish appearance. 16-18 is ok I guess. The topic wasn't really about the number, it was more about the reasoning behind the laws, and why feminists wanted to raise it.

They wanted to price out a good chunk of a females early prime so males can't monoplize them. Everybody knows when girls hit about 18 they go for the more manly look as they enter college and are exposed to hunky athletes, where as at 14-16 a lot of them like the boyish look. You don't understand that people judge males emotional and mental age by how old you look, not what you act like. Thats the true black pill.

 

[dingopuss]

They wanted to price out a good chunk of a females early prime so males can't monoplize them. Everybody knows when girls hit about 18 they go for the more manly look as they enter college and are exposed to hunky athletes, where as at 14-16 a lot of them like the boyish look. You don't understand that people judge males emotional and mental age by how old you look, not what you act like. Thats the true black pill.

Black pills can be hard to swallow.

I try to see things objectively (i.e. 21 year olds are on average more mentally equipped) but with the black pill, you see how society functions. They don't care if ugly young men look boyish, they still treat you as a criminal before you even take a step forward. Your average 14 year old girl doesn't want a "boyish" manlet facecel... whatever the hell that looks like.

 

[Dionysus]

it should be lower