The people in the comment section completely missed the point. They didn't understand why there was a problem with her being highlighted so much.
she wasn't the leader or face of anything, she was highlighted simply because she was a female
And how do they respond to that? They pulled up the "misogyny" card whilst pointing at guys being the face of a company, whilst claiming that they also don't credit everyone. This completely misses the point seeing katie was never the face of the company/project, she was simply another member of it yet she was highlighted so much based on nothing but her gender.
She didn't do anything that significantly stood out from the crowd, she was never given a leader role within that company, she was never the face of the company, she was simply another member. A member given too much recognition because she was a female.