Caesercel
Take a look to the sky just before you die.
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2020
- Posts
- 22,429
You know what I'm talking about
What do they even do with all that ramIt is. But in the future you may want to consider upgrading to 32 because modern gayming is headed in that direction.
They keep upgrading graphics and shit. The stories get shittier and shittier, but the graphics get more and more realistic. The average normie cuck, who the companies pander to, thoroughly enjoys that.What do they even do with all that ram
the size gets bigger and bigger, true goyslopeThey keep upgrading graphics and shit. The stories get shittier and shittier, but the graphics get more and more realistic. The average normie cuck, who the companies pander to, thoroughly enjoys that.
I have 40You know what I'm talking about
Why abt 2416gb are ok if you don't play the latest slop
better than 16 but i haven't seen 24gb kits nor laptops with such amount, it's important to have dual channelWhy abt 24
Sometimes more RAM can cause problems to one game. Say a game that plays well with 2GB of DDR3 RAM, you switch that to 4GB, and you start seeing slow downs in performance for whatever reason. As it was in the case of Age Of Empires Gold.better than 16 but i haven't seen 24gb kits nor laptops with such amount, it's important to have dual channel
if it's single channel then sure it will have slowdownsyou start seeing slow downs in performance for whatever reason.
There are very sensitive games, if its not the RAM, it is cpu clock speed.if it's single channel then sure it will have slowdowns
Fuck's a single channelif it's single channel then sure it will have slowdowns
best compromiseWhy abt 24
nah people been testing it and difference is minimal it's just a myth, 1-2% difference is nothing you can just oc memory and get perf backif it's single channel then sure it will have slowdowns
YesYou know what I'm talking about
Depends on your CPU. With AM4, there's a significant 5-10% gain running dual channel. For Intel, I suppose it's not worth it.if it's single channel then sure it will have slowdowns
This is really only for older games with 32 bit limitations (I've even had some with 16 bit installers)Sometimes more RAM can cause problems to one game. Say a game that plays well with 2GB of DDR3 RAM, you switch that to 4GB, and you start seeing slow downs in performance for whatever reason. As it was in the case of Age Of Empires Gold.
Nothing is as it seems.
I shouldn't expect a drop in performance using 16gb in something like Ragnarok right?It's passable for gaming now but 24 or 32 is much better
16 is perfect for general pc use
I'm not sure if there are 2x12 ddr5 kits, i know there are 2x24 and 2x48
Well of course, but those same problems remain unless someone Patches the thing in an unofficial way. Because, the original devs took a forever trip to Miami Vice.This is really only for older games with 32 bit limitations (I've even had some with 16 bit installers)
Looks like that's an older game so it probably wouldn't matterI shouldn't expect a drop in performance using 16gb in something like Ragnarok right?
I shouldn't expect a drop in performance using 16gb in something like Ragnarok right?
Looks like that's an older game so it probably wouldn't matter
Nigga I have a 10 year old backlog in games and Ragnarok still sounds fresh in my mind. Just how much has changed in a few years for 16 bg to be outdatedLooks like that's an older game so it probably wouldn't matter
I wouldn't worry about it then as long as you're not playing recent CPU heavy games.Nigga I have a 10 year old backlog in games and Ragnarok still sounds fresh in my mind. Just how much has changed in a few years for 16 bg to be outdated
Like?recent CPU heavy games.
Helldivers 2, Space Marine 2, Dragon's dogma 2, and TarkovLike?
Tarkov doesn't even look that graphic intensiveHelldivers 2, Space Marine 2, Dragon's dogma 2, and Tarkov
Games like MMOs with a lot of NPCs and stuff the CPU has to a lot do. Usually not the most graphically impressive games either, that's where GPU matters more. Also games like Cyberpunk that finally take advantage of using more cores. These are largely games I don't play, so.Like?
Some 3rd world poorfags
And yet freezes my pc that has 16gb and stutters like crazy for no reason. Those idiotic russians are insanely lazy with their optimization, Space Marine 2 was also made by ruskies and it runs like shit and is extremely blurry. I'm playing Enlisted and they can't fix the simplest bugs that were in the game for years and modders fixed it for them in a week or two and yet they refuse to listen and implement that Slavs are almost as bad as the indians if you ask me.Tarkov doesn't even look that graphic intensive
A guy on reddit told me that a ps5 is stronger than an rtx 4060 lappy cuz the ps5 can run 60fps on 4k but the 4060 can'tAnd yet freezes my pc that has 16gb and stutters like crazy for no reason. Those idiotic russians are insanely lazy with their optimization, Space Marine 2 was also made by ruskies and it runs like shit and is extremely blurry. I'm playing Enlisted and they can't fix the simplest bugs that were in the game for years and modders fixed it for them in a week or two and yet they refuse to listen and implement that Slavs are almost as bad as the indians if you ask me.
He is an idiot, PS5 can only run 4k in menu or indie games. PS5 uses temporal AA (like FSR 2) to stretch 480p-1080p (sometimes 1440p) image into 1440p/4k while in reality it's never a real 4k, it results in a very blurry image but they are too blind to notice that, i bet they never played on PS3 or any old game which was sharp as razor especially on PC.A guy on reddit told me that a ps5 is stronger than an rtx 4060 lappy cuz the ps5 can run 60fps on 4k but the 4060 can't
normies are consoooooomerThey keep upgrading graphics and shit. The stories get shittier and shittier, but the graphics get more and more realistic. The average normie cuck, who the companies pander to, thoroughly enjoys that.
No unreal engine 5 needs atleast 32 gb or ram on dual channelsYou know what I'm talking about