What's your opinion .
240 fps or death
It's definitely my bare minimum. As someone who's always been a poorfag I can tolerate 30fps but 60 is ideal for me.
Depends on the game. Slower genres like RPGs are fine at 30. Competitive shooters, I'd want at least 120.
What abt single player titles like god of war, elden ring or last of us
those games were designed with 60fps+ in mind, everything is going to look like shit without it
I think refresh rate is more important, 144hz bare minimum for a pc monitor
Elden Ring is locked at 60, or was. I'm fine with 60 in single player games like that, but if you can get more, great.
Is that so. But they are also available on 0s5 which is 30fps
What abt lower
normie games? nah thanks not doing that me personally
60 yes, but more is questionable
ive played on 60 and 240. I need the screens next to each other to even see the difference. after a few seconds apart I don't notice. My reflexes just aren't fast enough
ive played on 60 and 240. I need the screens next to each other to even see the difference. after a few seconds apart I don't notice. My reflexes just aren't fast enough
It is not necessary, but it makes for a pleasant experience.
I've been a poorcel and I got used to gaming to 30-40 fps.
I've been a poorcel and I got used to gaming to 30-40 fps.
My monitor has 60 hertz, so 60 fps has always been enough for me, but I do not know if this is due to the lack of other experience for comparison.
Ive 170, I will die, But its better than 60hz
For the most part yes, but there are some engines that feel ok with 40-50fps. For example 60fps in counter strike are barely playable, while 60fps in GTA 5 are comfortable to play.
just build 3 thousand dollar PC and turn on upscaler and frame generator bro
DLSS?
yes, DLSS, FSR.
Below 40 looks noticeably worse and 30 seems like lagging non stop. Unless in pvp shooters or fighting game pvp, 50-60 is enough for anything.
On switch i have 60fps mod for my games so the games run fine, You need simplemodmanager then files from gamebanana tho, For example i run red dead redeption 1 on 60fps with different mods as ive posted before
Thats impressive for a handheld to run 3d games on 60fps. On my vita most 3d games are visibly low fps, dipping in my observation under 25fps.On switch i have 60fps mod for my games so the games run fine, You need simplemodmanager then files from gamebanana tho, For example i run red dead redeption 1 on 60fps with different mods as ive posted before
Yeah i get 0% lag with the mod, I think switch has a 4gb nvidia tegra so it is possible
NVIDIA Tegra
NVIDIAによるARM系の省電力統合型プロセッサのシリーズ
The Nintendo Switch, a hybrid gaming console, uses the NVIDIA Tegra X1 system-on-chip (SoC). Specifically, it features a Tegra X1 processor with:- 4GB of LPDDR4 memory
- 25.6GB/s memory bandwidth
- Shared VRAM (not dedicated)
Nice. One day im gonna buy one.
Get otheros and athmosphere with sigpatches so you can play all games, And RCM loader from ebay
I wont have money for months, since now goes my 3 month break from neetbux. Once i have money. Thanks for help.
Completely Arbitrary
Really noticeable when you are playing those types on the Switch. So in that case, yes.
60 is the minimum acceptable framerate only exception are old console games that are fps locked since you don't have other options and they are rarely worth playing. 144fps and above are always preferable. I will be not buying your game if i can't achieve at least 60fps/1080p on mid end hardware.
60 fps is too little
D
Anything under 150 is not worth playing
Do you think a 3050 (mobile) can achieve that on a 12th gen i5 for those games
Last edited:
R
I don't like 30FPs but it works for some games as long as the frametime is good. Been playing silent hill remake at 60-80FPs and it's pretty good.
depends on the game but no since ton of people play on console
Im used to play games between 80 and 144fps
Switch is just ps3 pro
my monitor supports 144 hz and my pc is capable of 144 fps so for me 160 fps is the sweet spot, I may overclock my monitor but I recently bought it in July so I'm gonna hold off until I get a better one. I can't afford a 240hz monitor but my dream is to buy a 240 hz 1440p monitor with <1ms response time
60 fps on a 60 hz monitor is okay but it entirely depends on what hz my monitor is
30 fps on a 60 hz monitor is bad but it entirely depends on the monitor
30 fps is fine, but 60 is appreciated. I play on console primarily, but used to have a gaming PC. Depends on the game though.
anything 3d, 144 minimum
I'm fine with 40
stable 60 mogs all other garbage
the steam discussions tards that say 540hz only, can very rarely actually get that as stable fps
the steam discussions tards that say 540hz only, can very rarely actually get that as stable fps
I finally bought myself an cheap-ish(100 usd) led monitor, 27". It has 75hz refresh rate and i cant see any difference between 60 and 75. While difference between 30 and 45 is huge. Back when i had r7 260x which could run witcher 3 on ~30fps, dipping below 30 looked awful. Then i upgraded to r9 270 and had ~45fps. I would say for OK good experience 1080p and 40 fps is enough.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
