grimreaperec8
Abrogate
★
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Posts
- 30
Forget about chad. Forget about looks. Forget about status. females don't care about males. Their priorities focus on one thing: getting attention.
When attention is cheap, better yet, when it is free, female interest and female investment in any kind of real relationship drops. Many revert to
casual sex because they no longer need a personal male(tm) to stroke their egos and provide validation for their existance.
I personally know *some* women in relationships, many even going steady, but all of those that are are tradcon or found a top tier male.
There is an entire generation of 14-24 females right now who have essentially reduced their dating needs down to a bare minimum.
Women are OK with sharing chad to get sex only once in a month, especially if the other 29 days are spent on instagram posting.
Sex, romance, relationships, those things are just tremendously less important to females than they are to males. And it should be kind
of obvious. rom flicks and romantic books are popular when females get older and long to discover something in themselves that they
have always underexpressed and repressed for other interests. captain obvious here: Women are not naturally romantic.
The incel trend is being vastly underreported. For every 1 male that is reporting as an incel, there are 20 more right now who are writing off
current difficulties in their sex life as being blamed on some classical lack of effort. The incel count is going to EXPLODE in the next 5 years
as this silent majority come to terms with their reality and begin seriously searching for answers to a problem they can't escape.
Lads, I personally feel the answer to many of our problems is rather simple:
outlaw selfies.
I know this answer does not appeal to a lot of incels. It's really kind of deflating, it isn't a challenge we can get our egos around.
It would be so easy to accomplish that we feel it is impossible that this is the solution given how intense and complex the problem is.
*Caveat: I know this doesn't in any way neutralize the truth of the blackpills that status is important, that foids are broken monsters,
that looks are 100% correlatory with attraction. But it would make the incel epidemic much less of an epidemic.
There is some natural 1-5% of the male population that is sexless. And it doesn't even begin to speak to the incel epidemic in the east.
Their blackpill is far more ruthless and far more simple: there simply isn't enough women.
Here in western civilization, however, the vast majority of males (the upper 80%), while they may not have slayer or chad tier looks, are still
acceptable in their appearance. Women may naturally crave men who are above their looksmatch but to what degree has the economics
of male-female attraction factors been shifted by ready and free access to the attention from those men on social media, regardless if they
can have sex with them directly or not?
When attention is cheap, better yet, when it is free, female interest and female investment in any kind of real relationship drops. Many revert to
casual sex because they no longer need a personal male(tm) to stroke their egos and provide validation for their existance.
I personally know *some* women in relationships, many even going steady, but all of those that are are tradcon or found a top tier male.
There is an entire generation of 14-24 females right now who have essentially reduced their dating needs down to a bare minimum.
Women are OK with sharing chad to get sex only once in a month, especially if the other 29 days are spent on instagram posting.
Sex, romance, relationships, those things are just tremendously less important to females than they are to males. And it should be kind
of obvious. rom flicks and romantic books are popular when females get older and long to discover something in themselves that they
have always underexpressed and repressed for other interests. captain obvious here: Women are not naturally romantic.
The incel trend is being vastly underreported. For every 1 male that is reporting as an incel, there are 20 more right now who are writing off
current difficulties in their sex life as being blamed on some classical lack of effort. The incel count is going to EXPLODE in the next 5 years
as this silent majority come to terms with their reality and begin seriously searching for answers to a problem they can't escape.
Lads, I personally feel the answer to many of our problems is rather simple:
outlaw selfies.
I know this answer does not appeal to a lot of incels. It's really kind of deflating, it isn't a challenge we can get our egos around.
It would be so easy to accomplish that we feel it is impossible that this is the solution given how intense and complex the problem is.
*Caveat: I know this doesn't in any way neutralize the truth of the blackpills that status is important, that foids are broken monsters,
that looks are 100% correlatory with attraction. But it would make the incel epidemic much less of an epidemic.
There is some natural 1-5% of the male population that is sexless. And it doesn't even begin to speak to the incel epidemic in the east.
Their blackpill is far more ruthless and far more simple: there simply isn't enough women.
Here in western civilization, however, the vast majority of males (the upper 80%), while they may not have slayer or chad tier looks, are still
acceptable in their appearance. Women may naturally crave men who are above their looksmatch but to what degree has the economics
of male-female attraction factors been shifted by ready and free access to the attention from those men on social media, regardless if they
can have sex with them directly or not?
Last edited: