R
1 Out of Africa migrants from Ethiopia went to india around 65 k years ago.
<<The9 appearance of the inhabitants is also not very different in India and Ethiopia: the southern Indians are rather more like Ethiopians as they are black to look on, and their hair is black; only they are not so snub-nosed or woolly-haired as the Ethiopians; the northern Indians are most like the Egyptians physically.<<
Ancient Greek historian recorded them as being similar to Ethiopian which is located in horn the Caucasoid section of Africa.
Further leading this thesis would be the fact according to (Raghavan and Bulbeck) Most Modern day curries share affinities of caucasoid.
>>If there were an Australoid “substratum” component to Indians’ ancestry, we would expect some degree of craniometric similarity between Howells’ Southwest Pacific series and Indians. But in fact, the Southwest Pacific and Indian are craniometrically very distinct, falsifying any claim for an Australoid substratum in India."<<
Most likely this would mean The indigenous Indians of curry land were north African's or Ethiopians called Caucasoid by anthropologists.As we know the migration roots occurred from Northern Africa.
Evidence Against the Australoid hypothsis.
www.independent.co.uk
Evidence against the hypothsis we are a proxy for negrito is ruled out by the findings of (Raghavan and Bulbeck)
So from both ancient greek writing and even modern scholars confirms were similar to the Ethiopians than Australoid or the dreaded aboriginals.And it would make sense as the skulls used had broadly Caucasoid characteristics.
2 45,000–20,000 Years ago the first Indians start accumulating advanced technology so the population booms and increases.
This lead to increased technology and a overall increase in the standards of living.And by this time period south asia was the largest population of that time period.
3 ~ 7000 BCE in the Mehrgarh at the foot of the Bolan Hills in Balochistan agricultural settlements began it was a largest connection point between the Mediterranean and the indus civilization who were most likely already caucasoid as they were from the horn of Africa.Most likely they would have intermixed with med's.
4 7000–3000 BCE: Migration of Iranian agriculturists from the zagros mountains came and mated with with the peoples of the Indus civilization.
5 2300–1700 BCE: >>The period of the Bactria–Margiana Archaeological
Complex (BMAC), a civilization centred on the Oxus river (also called
Amu Darya) and covering today’s northern Afghanistan, southern
Uzbekistan and western Tajikistan. e BMAC had close trade and
cultural relations with the Harappan Civilization.<<
Since we know south asia at this point was the most inhabited place in the entire world it is safe to assume some genetic admixture occured. We also got indo European culture from them.Further adding to thesis that India is in general has always been connected to middle east some what.
6 <<2000 BCE: Two major waves of migrations with their origin in China – after
it had gone through the farming revolution and the resultant population
surge – reshape south-east Asia. e rst one brings Austroasiatic
languages, new plants and a new variety of rice to India after 2000 BCE.>>
Around 2000 BC we got admixture from china bringing in the Asiatic culture adding to Asiatic influence but note it's very little minute amounts.
7>>2000–1000 BCE: Multiple waves of Steppe pastoralist migrants from central
Asia into south Asia, bringing Indo-European languages and new religious
and cultural practices.<<
The last migration gave us some steppe extra steppe genes.
Overall most Indians tend to have Caucasoid genes but northerners have the highest european connection.
Over all south asia is more connected with the middle east and for the north european.
<<The9 appearance of the inhabitants is also not very different in India and Ethiopia: the southern Indians are rather more like Ethiopians as they are black to look on, and their hair is black; only they are not so snub-nosed or woolly-haired as the Ethiopians; the northern Indians are most like the Egyptians physically.<<
Ancient Greek historian recorded them as being similar to Ethiopian which is located in horn the Caucasoid section of Africa.
Further leading this thesis would be the fact according to (Raghavan and Bulbeck) Most Modern day curries share affinities of caucasoid.
>>If there were an Australoid “substratum” component to Indians’ ancestry, we would expect some degree of craniometric similarity between Howells’ Southwest Pacific series and Indians. But in fact, the Southwest Pacific and Indian are craniometrically very distinct, falsifying any claim for an Australoid substratum in India."<<
Most likely this would mean The indigenous Indians of curry land were north African's or Ethiopians called Caucasoid by anthropologists.As we know the migration roots occurred from Northern Africa.
Evidence Against the Australoid hypothsis.
Aboriginal Australians 'have been genetically isolated for 50,000 years'
DNA study says there is no direct evidence they ever intermarried with South-East Asians as some had suggested
www.independent.co.uk
Evidence against the hypothsis we are a proxy for negrito is ruled out by the findings of (Raghavan and Bulbeck)
So from both ancient greek writing and even modern scholars confirms were similar to the Ethiopians than Australoid or the dreaded aboriginals.And it would make sense as the skulls used had broadly Caucasoid characteristics.
2 45,000–20,000 Years ago the first Indians start accumulating advanced technology so the population booms and increases.
This lead to increased technology and a overall increase in the standards of living.And by this time period south asia was the largest population of that time period.
3 ~ 7000 BCE in the Mehrgarh at the foot of the Bolan Hills in Balochistan agricultural settlements began it was a largest connection point between the Mediterranean and the indus civilization who were most likely already caucasoid as they were from the horn of Africa.Most likely they would have intermixed with med's.
4 7000–3000 BCE: Migration of Iranian agriculturists from the zagros mountains came and mated with with the peoples of the Indus civilization.
5 2300–1700 BCE: >>The period of the Bactria–Margiana Archaeological
Complex (BMAC), a civilization centred on the Oxus river (also called
Amu Darya) and covering today’s northern Afghanistan, southern
Uzbekistan and western Tajikistan. e BMAC had close trade and
cultural relations with the Harappan Civilization.<<
Since we know south asia at this point was the most inhabited place in the entire world it is safe to assume some genetic admixture occured. We also got indo European culture from them.Further adding to thesis that India is in general has always been connected to middle east some what.
6 <<2000 BCE: Two major waves of migrations with their origin in China – after
it had gone through the farming revolution and the resultant population
surge – reshape south-east Asia. e rst one brings Austroasiatic
languages, new plants and a new variety of rice to India after 2000 BCE.>>
Around 2000 BC we got admixture from china bringing in the Asiatic culture adding to Asiatic influence but note it's very little minute amounts.
7>>2000–1000 BCE: Multiple waves of Steppe pastoralist migrants from central
Asia into south Asia, bringing Indo-European languages and new religious
and cultural practices.<<
The last migration gave us some steppe extra steppe genes.
Overall most Indians tend to have Caucasoid genes but northerners have the highest european connection.
Over all south asia is more connected with the middle east and for the north european.
