data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/100f0/100f0ed3b7568f2f089345df07abb63374a34df8" alt="Choler"
Choler
Officer
★★★
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2025
- Posts
- 767
''this one exception to the rule disproves your theory, you incel bigot!!''
God I hate plebbitors and normies with every fibre of my being
Until "that one exception" is in something inconvenient, e.g., that Chinese guy who broke the 10 second barrier. Then libtards turn full racist.''this one exception to the rule disproves your theory, you incel bigot!!''
''this one exception to the rule disproves your theory, you incel bigot!!''
God I hate plebbitors and normies with every fibre of my being
literally famous people
''this one exception to the rule disproves your theory, you incel bigot!!''
God I hate plebbitors and normies with every fibre of my being
foids are dumb and retarded as fuck jflAnd why do foids seem to be under the impression that being short is the only barrier? In addition to being short many if not most of us are mixed race/non-White, neurodivergent, dark hair and/or eyes, deformed face etc. all of that adds up it's not just one attribute.
They certainly are.foids are dumb and retarded as fuck jflusing a lot of white good looking celebrities to say height doesn't matter
![]()
autist detectedThose are acception and btw, bluepilled content is not allowed
kautist detected
What?Until "that one exception" is in something inconvenient, e.g., that Chinese guy who broke the 10 second barrier. Then libtards turn full racist.
As usual, IT is relying on anecdotal evidence rather than population-wide trends. Outliers don’t disprove general patterns—while some short men succeed, studies consistently show that taller men have higher dating success. Survivorship bias makes IT notice exceptions more than the rule. One person’s experience doesn’t change the overall statistical preference, just like knowing a smoker who lived to 100 doesn’t disprove that smoking reduces life expectancy.
Just be a millionaire actor theory
This is valid. Completely indisputableBare minimum for foids = 5’7 HTN or status maxxed moneymaxxed mtn
As usual, IT is relying on anecdotal evidence rather than population-wide trends. Outliers don’t disprove general patterns—while some short men succeed, studies consistently show that taller men have higher dating success. Survivorship bias makes IT notice exceptions more than the rule. One person’s experience doesn’t change the overall statistical preference, just like knowing a smoker who lived to 100 doesn’t disprove that smoking reduces life expectancy.
Just be more confident bro
Study Findings
Additional Information
- Observed Couples: 720 couples were studied.
- Female Taller: In only 1 out of 720 couples was the female taller than the male.
- Expected by Chance: The probability of a female being taller than a male in a randomly paired couple was estimated to be 2 out of 100 (2%).
- Deviation from Chance: The observed rate of females being taller (1 out of 720, or approximately 0.14%) was significantly lower than the expected rate (2%).
Key Points
- Height Difference: The average height difference between males and females in the study was 15 cm (approximately 6 inches), with males being taller.
- Height Preferences: Females, on average, preferred males to be about 16.8 cm (6.7 inches) taller. Males, on average, preferred females to be about 11.3 cm (4.5 inches) shorter.
- The study provides strong evidence that there is a social norm for males to be taller than their female partners.
- The observed rate of females being taller than their partners was significantly lower than what would be expected by chance.
- Both males and females expressed preferences for the male to be taller in a relationship.