GoffSystemQB
Nefarious Dark Overlord of I.N.C.E.L. aka mod
-
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
- Posts
- 5,324
This is along the same lines of the nonsense redpill/PUA cope crap that "women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are the gatekeeprs of relationships." NO women are the gatekeepers of BOTH.
Here's the data on women being unattractive having ZERO EFFECT OR A POSITIVE EFFECT ON OBTAINING A LONG-TERM PARTNER.
The Juggernaut law seems to show in marriage rates. For example, Kanazawa, Hu & Larere (2018) conducted an analysis of the The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health data consisting of a sample of 20,745 adolescents. The authors concluded that 'very unattractive' women were more likely to be married or cohabitating then merely unattractive or even average to good looking women, and their spouses tended to earn more than their better-looking female counterparts. They inferred that intelligent men have a preference to marry or mate with very unattractive women,[4] which may also be evidence of a typical betabux scenario.
A Spanish study, on the other hand, only found evidence for the weak Juggernaut law:
“Being unattractive reduced the probability of mating for males by between 15 and 17 points, when compared to the more attractive group, and 10 points compared to those with an average attractiveness level. There was a statistically significant difference between the most attractive group and the normal group in favor of the former, which included education level, age and social class of origin.” “Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. There were no statistically significant difference between them in terms of their attractiveness.”[5]
FEMCELS DON'T EXIST AT ALL. NOT EVEN BY THEIR OWN REWRITTEN DEFINITION OF CELIBACY.
Last edited: