Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Incels should be able to have standards without being called volcels

Nordicel94

Nordicel94

Pancake-faced viking-cel
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Posts
1,407
If we can't get it up for someone, it's obviously not going to work. It's the mechanical part of male attraction. So the threads about ascending with a 300lbs ogre, if people answer "no", they shouldn't be called volcels. Volcel is someone who passes on foids they could bang but they decide they aren't pretty enough for them.
 
Fully agree with that. Let's recall the "pigwoman experiment": the lower tier normie guys who swiped right and even initiated the conversation were simply desperate (no matches on Tinder for months!), sad and lonely. In reality, they wouldn't be able to perform with a pig like that (I think the images were AI-generated anyway and if you haven't seen them, I'd recommend not to Google for it for your own mental wellbeing).
 
Fully agree with that. Let's recall the "pigwoman experiment": the lower tier normie guys who swiped right and even initiated the conversation were simply desperate (no matches on Tinder for months!), sad and lonely. In reality, they wouldn't be able to perform with a pig like that (I think the images were AI-generated anyway and if you haven't seen them, I'd recommend not to Google for it for your own mental wellbeing).
That rings a bell, I think I've seen that. Sure ~5% of men will fuck anything, but it's pathological at that point.
 
i just want a young virgin foid that isn't corrupted by feminism. idc how she looks as long as she isn't 600 pounds.
 
I disagree. If you have someone interested in you and you just can't get it up for them you are not better than "femcels" who most of us agree aren't proper incels. After all "femcels" could also simply argue that they don't get wet but IMHO that doesn't matter, having some validation is already a completely different experience no having no opportunities.
 
I disagree. If you have someone interested in you and you just can't get it up for them you are not better than "femcels" who most of us agree aren't proper incels. After all "femcels" could also simply argue that they don't get wet but IMHO that doesn't matter, having some validation is already a completely different experience no having no opportunities.
There's gotta be some element of reason to it all, if a 700lbs ogre with Crouzon-syndrome likes you and you don't fuck her, are you then a volcel? I mean if you're so disgusted physically that you can't get it up then how is it supposed to work? It's the same thing as telling a starving person to "just eat dirt". Now telling a starving person to eat a mouldy apple is another thing, they will do that, and so will incels (i.e sleep with unattractive women) but there's gotta be a line drawn in the sand.
 
There's gotta be some element of reason to it all, if a 700lbs ogre with Crouzon-syndrome likes you and you don't fuck her, are you then a volcel? I mean if you're so disgusted physically that you can't get it up then how is it supposed to work? It's the same thing as telling a starving person to "just eat dirt". Now telling a starving person to eat a mouldy apple is another thing, they will do that, and so will incels (i.e sleep with unattractive women) but there's gotta be a line drawn in the sand.
There's a lot of foid worshippers/apologists in the guise of incels. Best to just ignore those filth.
 
if a 700lbs ogre with Crouzon-syndrome likes you and you don't fuck her, are you then a volcel?
Yes. You might not like it, but complaining about "all my options are trash" is what femcels do. I have to admit that I would also not have a relationship with someone with a genetic disease, but for just sex? I think that's different.

And if you physically cannot get it up "normally" idk, maybe you can try viagra. Obviously I have no experience and ig it could make problems. But at least mutual oral sex and sex toy use should be possible anyway and that could lead to an erection and then to proper sex.

And no, I don't think "just eat dirt" is apt, not even telling them to eat a mouldy apple. Because both dirt and mould are health concerns while an ugly, disabled women can just be compared to a food you really don't like, but is still not dangerous. Idk, maybe "clean" fried insects.
 
Yes. You might not like it, but complaining about "all my options are trash" is what femcels do. I have to admit that I would also not have a relationship with someone with a genetic disease, but for just sex? I think that's different.

And if you physically cannot get it up "normally" idk, maybe you can try viagra. Obviously I have no experience and ig it could make problems. But at least mutual oral sex and sex toy use should be possible anyway and that could lead to an erection and then to proper sex.

And no, I don't think "just eat dirt" is apt, not even telling them to eat a mouldy apple. Because both dirt and mould are health concerns while an ugly, disabled women can just be compared to a food you really don't like, but is still not dangerous. Idk, maybe "clean" fried insects.
Femcels literally have millions of options though, of various shapes and sizes, they can literally go on a sex site and have a 5/10 man over to theirs in 30 mins but a man is a volcel for rejecting one singular foid who is immensely unattractive to the point that his body rejects the thought of her?

I highly doubt that you would actually go through with it with a 700lbs foid with Crouzon-syndrome if it came to that.
 
but a man is a volcel for rejecting one singular foid who is immensely unattractive to the point that his body rejects the thought of her?
The issue I am having is simply that it's hard to draw a fair line where every femcel is considered not an incel while normal incels are not considered volcels but still can reject safe opportunities for sex.
I highly doubt that you would actually go through with it with a 700lbs foid with Crouzon-syndrome if it came to that.
I'm not sure, for sex I don't have that high standards. But the main point is that: Even if I would reject her, I still would consider myself a volcel.
 
If a "femcel" refuses to have sex with a sub-8 it's cause she has standarts and isn't just a piece of meat, you inkwell. It does not invalidate her being "celibate" in any way or form you're just too stupid and don't get it.
However If an incel goes past a dead racoon on the sidewalk and doesn't take action, he's clearly a volcel with options counting in billions.
 
i just want to be happy
 
i just want a young virgin foid that isn't corrupted by feminism
My standards as well along with can't be a fatty/slob or have a substance abuse problem
 
That is obvious depending of the female used as example. The nasty landwhales you mention are examples of where saying no to them is totally fine.
 
I disagree, in most cases. Rejecting a morbidly obese deformed landwhale is fine but rejecting a foid who is a bit chubby and ugly makes you a volcel or standardcel. She has to be honey boo-boo levels fat and ugly otherwise, volcel.
 

Similar threads

Nordicel94
Replies
17
Views
268
FishmanBecker
FishmanBecker
Racial-Identitarian
Replies
9
Views
470
illumizoldyck
illumizoldyck
Nordicel94
Replies
29
Views
777
Rationalizer1999
Rationalizer1999
pedrolopezwasright
Replies
23
Views
383
Neucher Koala
Neucher Koala

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top