Maybe I misspoke. Whites may be more k-selective in the sense that they don't multiply like insects, but the sexual dynamics of curry and sand countries are
far more tradcucked compared to white countries and it's largely always been that way. Look at how much promiscuous sex is being had in white countries compared to curry and sand ones; 'jeets and sandnigs largely touch pussy only to make kids (obviously many sands are capable of adapting to the sexual dynamics of countries like Germany and France, but that's only because they're physically the closest race to whites). If you need metrics you can look at things like the average age of virginity loss in different countries; Turks (most liberal MENA population and more liberal than any curroids) on average lose their virginity at 18.3 years old, while Poles (arguably the most conservative European population, even if said conservatism applies only to men) lose their virginity on average at 18.8 years old. Barely a difference between the two, and you can find far more extreme examples; the average age of virginity loss in Anglosphere countries is around 17-18 and in Scandi countries it's around 15-16, while in literally every curry country it's about 20-fucking-4
I have one planned which will explore the social/sexual racial hierarchy from an interesting angle that myself and other users here have touched on but not in the proper depth.
@Stupid Clown I was actually inspired to do so by a thread I saw from you yesterday about that Asian guy on twitter getting dogpiled on by Western normoid cunts for saying that Lindy Liu chick or whatever her name is doesn't fit Asians' beauty standards
Arranged marriage has been the dominant marriage institution in East Asia, South Asia, and MENA for many centuries (though it's collapsing now), so most ethnics have evolved to lack the height, frame, physical prowess, mate-guarding instinct, and natural charisma required to succeed in dating markets with free mate choice. In a way, we've always been incels
@Destroyed lonely
@wereq