Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Incels and Radical Feminists should work together.

mlcurrycel

mlcurrycel

Marxist-Rodgerist
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Posts
6,524
In Maoism, the concept of 'primary and secondary contradiction' teaches Marxists to ally with weaker exploiters against the stronger ones. This is because the weaker exploiter is condemned to annihilation by the stronger, who will then cannablise its fallen opponent. By supporting the weaker while growing stronger to defeat both, a Communist party can avoid being the sole focus of enmity as well as win the trust and honour of the people.

Mao Tse-Tung demonstrated this by working alongside the KMT to fight against Imperial Japan. This diverted enmity from Japan and the KMT away from the CPP momentarily, and convinced the populace to support communism when the KMT backtracked on its promises.

Incels can appropriate this strategy by fighting the common enemies that it shares with Radical Feminism : Fake-Up and Raunch Culture in the media. Radfems and TERFS hate imagery of attractive women and incels hate the propagated norms defining attractive men (Chad and Tyrone versus oreocels, Changs, Hrithiks, Abduls, and assorted ethniccels). Radfems also attack female looksmaxxing such as plastic surgery, fake-up, or staying in a healthy BMI range. By eliminating these two, sub-8 roasties will lose a portion of their SMV, thus decreasing the number of orbiters and cuckbuxxers they can fool.

All Foward the Anti-Rauch United Front! Down with Fake-Up!
 
Is this thread for real ?
 
Radfems wouldn't be willing to ally with us because they hate us. Literally every political group hates Incels.
 
Trust the chinks to revise Marxist theory just in order to write realpolitik into it. Autistic ant-people.
At least third-worldism is bigger-brained than first worldism if you want to get anything done.
 
Radfems wouldn't be willing to ally with us because they hate us. Literally every political group hates Incels.

100% can confirm.
Many radfems talk about their distaste for us, because they think we’re “entitled manbabies”
 
the ugliest foid has an higher SMV than the hottest guy, they live in tutorial-mode and can not understand us
Is this thread for real ?
Radfems wouldn't be willing to ally with us because they hate us. Literally every political group hates Incels.

If /pol/ can astroturf feminists into supporting weird shit, we can astroturf them jnto unknowingly allying with us on issues we agree about. We will never get them blackpilled or to think positively about us, just like Mao never convinced Chiang Hai-Shek to become a communist. What we are attempting to do is to weaken Chad and Stacey by using Bertha against them.
Trust the chinks to revise Marxist theory just in order to write realpolitik into it. Autistic ant-people.
At least third-worldism is bigger-brained than first worldism if you want to get anything done.
Fellow high IQ Biaoist here, encircle the Global City!
 
Last edited:
I deleted the message because this topic has no sense, there is not anything in common between us and them, only bluepilled cuck believe in an hypothetical affinities
 
I deleted the message because this topic has no sense, there is not anything in common between us and them, only bluepilled cuck believe in an hypothetical affinities
The CPP and the KMT were fundamentally incompatible, but the enemy of your enemy is your (temporary) friend. Do you want Fake-Up to be looked down upon?
 
Blank 063c1df39aae3940245cb46c29df9a13
 
It this supposed to be one of those "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" type things? If so it would never work. Stupid idea.
I'm rekt by your facts and logic. They will never accept us, but we can utilise Bertha against Stacey. It worked for Mao and it can work for us.
 
Let's recruit single mothers and some cuckolds! What could go wrong? I'm sure they'd love to help us out!!
 
augustcels at it again
 
In Maoism, the concept of 'primary and secondary contradiction' teaches Marxists to ally with weaker exploiters against the stronger ones. This is because the weaker exploiter is condemned to annihilation by the stronger, who will then cannablise its fallen opponent.

The idea with "primary and secondary contradictions" isn't about allies but about the idea that secondary contradictions (such as racism) are the result of the primary contradiction, which is capitalism. Unsurprisingly, this then lead and leads to debates about which role the fight against racism, for instance, should play in leftist action.

One of the worst things about Maoism, and a total "heresy" from a Marxist-Leninist position, is the idea that poverty itself is "good" in the sense that it radicalizes people and drives them closer towards Socialist revolution. History has proven that this is obviously wrong, this is a romantic illusion. Due to a lack of education and independence, the most oppressed and most poor people are often even the most LOYAL supporters of the oppressing ruling class. This was true for the starving peasants in 18th century French (the revolution was driven rather by the citoyens, the citizens, of the big cities) and it is also true for today if you look at African-Americans, for instance who worship the capitalist and imperialist open border Democrats, and prefer them heavily over so-called "populists" such as Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump.

And I guess this will/is also true for incels. The idea that men will become more radical the more oppressed they are is just not true. They just will become even more beta and even more cucked. Or they become these false-bravado-thug-white-knights who want to literally attack you with knives if you disrespect m'lady. Or shotgun dads. Also, if you look here at the forums .. many here are just mediocre college student types. The REALLY ugly almost disfigured types who are 35 year old NEETS ... many of them are often surprisingly beta and cucked and FAR from becoming radical. Incels are like the citizens/citoyens in revolutionary France whereas the cucked soy boys or disfigured omega types are like the peasants who have defended the Catholic Church.

Anyway. Also, radfems just hate heterosexuality. This is like the modern puritanism or Catholicism to stay in that metaphor with the French Revolution. "Sexist" and "unchaste" basically mean the same thing: "not being ashamed of the desire to have sex for pleasure especially as a low-status man." No coalition with them.
 
Thank you.

Worst outcome, we create more division.
The idea with "primary and secondary contradictions" isn't about allies but about the idea that secondary contradictions (such as racism) are the result of the primary contradiction, which is capitalism. Unsurprisingly, this then lead and leads to debates about which role the fight against racism, for instance, should play in leftist action.

One of the worst things about Maoism, and a total "heresy" from a Marxist-Leninist position, is the idea that poverty itself is "good" in the sense that it radicalizes people and drives them closer towards Socialist revolution. History has proven that this is obviously wrong, this is a romantic illusion. Due to a lack of education and independence, the most oppressed and most poor people are often even the most LOYAL supporters of the oppressing ruling class. This was true for the starving peasants in 18th century French (the revolution was driven rather by the citoyens, the citizens, of the big cities) and it is also true for today if you look at African-Americans, for instance who worship the capitalist and imperialist open border Democrats, and prefer them heavily over so-called "populists" such as Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump.

And I guess this will/is also true for incels. The idea that men will become more radical the more oppressed they are is just not true. They just will become even more beta and even more cucked. Or they become these false-bravado-thug-white-knights who want to literally attack you with knives if you disrespect m'lady. Or shotgun dads. Also, if you look here at the forums .. many here are just mediocre college student types. The REALLY ugly almost disfigured types who are 35 year old NEETS ... many of them are often surprisingly beta and cucked and FAR from becoming radical. Incels are like the citizens/citoyens in revolutionary France whereas the cucked soy boys or disfigured omega types are like the peasants who have defended the Catholic Church.

Anyway. Also, radfems just hate heterosexuality. This is like the modern puritanism or Catholicism to stay in that metaphor with the French Revolution. "Sexist" and "unchaste" basically mean the same thing: "not being ashamed of the desire to have sex for pleasure especially as a low-status man." No coalition with them.
High IQ post. Are you a Hoxhaist? Lenin said that in face of the labour aristocracy, Marxists should radicalise the lower and more exploited working class. Mao said that the peasants were going to rise up anhways, and that he was only making the best of an underdeveloped situation. Stalin said that the revolution in China required the peasants.

You are 100% right about radfem TERF lesbos viscerally hating heterosexuality. That's why I want to use ideological ju-jitsu to use their hatred against Chad and Stacey instead of us.
 
Marxist teachings? Joining with radfems? This thread:


DumpsterFire2
 
Radical feminists are women who never got laid with Chad. They are basically the closest females can get to inceldom, since women have no problem getting sex but they suffer like incels if they cannot get Chad.

Because of this, all their lives are devoted to exact revenge on men and maleness in general, with incels being particularly odious to them because those are the class of men which nature expect them to mate with, and they can't stand that. Incels making an alliance with feminists makes as much sense as blacks making an alliance with the KKK.
 
'Let's attack female privilege using Feminists'
"omg CUCK CUCK CUCK :soy:"
Radical feminists are women who never got laid with Chad. They are basically the closest females can get to inceldom, since women have no problem getting sex but they suffer like incels if they cannot get Chad.

Because of this, all their lives are devoted to exact revenge on men and maleness in general, with incels being particularly odious to them because those are the class of men which nature expect them to mate with, and they can't stand that.
Women are always backstabbing each other and talking shit about each other. You think Bertha doesn't hate Stacy and Becky? Foids use low value men against men, so we need to fight fire with fire.
 
If anything alliance with the right is much better. Many far righters are incels in denial and they're one step away from calling themselves incels.
Leftists? No way in hell.
 
If anything alliance with the right is much better. Many far righters are incels in denial and they're one step away from calling themselves incels.
Leftists? No way in hell.
Take the blinders off. No one wants to call themselves incels because their ego is too high and it means social suicide. When the news article claiming alt-right members lose virginity later in life came out, were alt-cels bonding together? No, they attacked it as Soros propaganda and denounced it as an ad-hominem. Just because a few neo-nazis in your favourite discord server ranted about women does not mean that the alt-right isan incel friendly force.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn
Right wingers of all stripes would rather let Chadolf cuck incels than give incels enforced monogamy. You just think they support you because they complain about HR sluts, but they would backstab you in a heartbeat, just like radfems.
 
National Socialism? Enforced Monogamy?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn
Is this supposed to be bad? I'm very aware of this, it's complete lifefuel. No more incels would be born in Hitlers world. No more suffering.
Take the blinders off. No one wants to call themselves incels because their ego is too high and it means social suicide. When the news article claiming alt-right members lose virginity later in life came out, were alt-cels bonding together? No, they attacked it as Soros propaganda and denounced it as an ad-hominem. Just because a few neo-nazis in your favourite discord server ranted about women does not mean that the alt-right isan incel friendly force.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn
Right wingers of all stripes would rather let Chadolf cuck incels than give incels enforced monogamy. You just think they support you because they complain about HR sluts, but they would backstab you in a heartbeat, just like radfems.
The programs of the NSDAP relating to increasing birthrates were the perfect counter to the Kalergi plan and forced migration efforts by globalist Jews. They saved their society from degenerate sluts and sexual promiscuity. German men could date their looksmatch in Hitlers germany, no more hypergamy. And yet you think they are the enemy. Fool.
 
Last edited:
Is this supposed to be bad? I'm very aware of this, it's complete lifefuel. No more incels would be born in Hitlers world. No more suffering.
Are you crazy? Have you forgotten that Hypergamy causes women to shoot for the top 20%? You think an unequal economic system won't lead to statusmaxxers to cuck other men? Have you forgotten that getting into the SS required passing a photographic test were Himmler would look for 'slavic' (sub8) traits? Do you think that if Chadolf is fucking extra women, that's not cucking the lowest tier of men? Do you think that the ethnic slave force of the Nazis wouldn't be incel males?

If incels really have no ego, they need to abandon the 'never apologise, never explain' principle of mass media and debate in good faith. If you're actually a Nazi, answer the questions of a fellow incel camarade. If yoh're 'trolling', keep that bullshit to Off-Topic or r/Braincels .
 
Are you crazy? Have you forgotten that Hypergamy causes women to shoot for the top 20%? You think an unequal economic system won't lead to statusmaxxers to cuck other men? Have you forgotten that getting into the SS required passing a photographic test were Himmler would look for 'slavic' (sub8) traits? Do you think that if Chadolf is fucking extra women, that's not cucking the lowest tier of men? Do you think that the ethnic slave force of the Nazis wouldn't be incel males?

If incels really have no ego, they need to abandon the 'never apologise, never explain' principle of mass media and debate in good faith. If you're actually a Nazi, answer the questions of a fellow incel camarade. If yoh're 'trolling', keep that bullshit to Off-Topic or r/Braincels .
Hypergamy is a result of a promiscuous society. Hypergamy was not a problem in the past. Ethnic solidarity was key to unity in NSDAP's Germany, of course they didn't let ethnics into the most elite army of its time, the SS. Ethnics could have joined the Wehrmacht or the african legion if they wanted in that bad.

You are ignoring the fact that inceldom as a problem would be reverted under National Socialistic rule, traditionalism and traditional families did NOT have a hypergamy problem in the past. Reverting to traditionalism is the only way to overcome the degenerate slut-loving society that has been forced into existence in the present day.

And no, I'm not trolling.
 
Hypergamy is a result of a promiscuous society. Hypergamy was not a problem in the past. Ethnic solidarity was key to unity in NSDAP's Germany, of course they didn't let ethnics into the most elite army of its time, the SS. Ethnics could have joined the Wehrmacht or the african legion if they wanted in that bad.

You are ignoring the fact that inceldom as a problem would be reverted under National Socialistic rule, traditionalism and traditional families did NOT have a hypergamy problem in the past. Reverting to traditionalism is the only way to overcome the degenerate slut-loving society that has been forced into existence in the present day.

And no, I'm not trolling.
You're clearly more redpilled than blackpilled if you believe that. Let's clear something up : If in Islam, Abdul takes four wives, and in Nazi Germany, Chadolf fucks more than one woman, doesn't that logically lead to some man somewhere missing out on pussy? Beyond that, why did you change the ethniccel question to that of non-white soldiers? Nazis believe in following the example of the Iberians in Latin America and the English in North America and India by using a foreign labour force to strengthen the war machine and living standards back home. You are a traitor to ethniccels.

Also, you're a low iq brainlet if you believe fascist paligenesis = tradition.
 
You're clearly more redpilled than blackpilled if you believe that. Let's clear something up : If in Islam, Abdul takes four wives, and in Nazi Germany, Chadolf fucks more than one woman, doesn't that logically lead to some man somewhere missing out on pussy? Beyond that, why did you change the ethniccel question to that of non-white soldiers? Nazis believe in following the example of the Iberians in Latin America and the English in North America and India by using a foreign labour force to strengthen the war machine and living standards back home. You are a traitor to ethniccels.

Also, you're a low iq brainlet if you believe fascist paligenesis = tradition.
I'm not ethnic, I'm white. How can I be a traitor to something I'm not apart of?
Besides, I believe National Socialism should be the global standard, regardless of race. E.G; a predominately black country could adopt National Socialism, and encourage an increase in birth rates of desirable black traits, and enforce a moulded version of the 25 NS tenets, and base it around their race.
In National Socialism, ideally "Chadolf" takes 1 virgin wife, no sexual promiscuity for men either.
Traditionalism is not palingenesis.
How am I more redpilled than blackpilled? Looks=everything. But traditionalism can change that, and make it how it used to be.
Was there hypergamy in 1940s Germany? No.
Hypergamy in 2018? To the point even chadlites have to date at least 3 points lower.
 
Last edited:
Radfems wouldn't be willing to ally with us because they hate us. Literally every political group hates Incels.

Radfemincels hate us the most. They think we're the very paragon of toxic masculinity and misogyny.

I can tell you that for a fact now. They hate Escortcelling coping Incels with a hatred unparalleled in the whole feminism sphere.

Siding with those scum is equivalent to slitting my own throat.
You're forgetting that the modern foid only seeks to further advance itself. Bertha won't let us utilize her, the closest you'd get is bertha trying to utilize you without any help from her. Even then, that's still unlikely. These foids would sooner advance themselves on their own than even consider helping us. Foids have us where they want us. At the bottom and feeling like absolute shit.
Radical feminists are women who never got laid with Chad. They are basically the closest females can get to inceldom, since women have no problem getting sex but they suffer like incels if they cannot get Chad.

Because of this, all their lives are devoted to exact revenge on men and maleness in general, with incels being particularly odious to them because those are the class of men which nature expect them to mate with, and they can't stand that. Incels making an alliance with feminists makes as much sense as blacks making an alliance with the KKK.
Also, radfems just hate heterosexuality. This is like the modern puritanism or Catholicism to stay in that metaphor with the French Revolution. "Sexist" and "unchaste" basically mean the same thing: "not being ashamed of the desire to have sex for pleasure especially as a low-status man." No coalition with them.
 
Last edited:
A+ Effort Post. I mean there are some similarities with Incels and Radical Feminists. Both hate party culture and high expectations of their respective genders. In an ideal world, we could ally. I don't think that would ever happen though. Too unrealistic.
 
I'm not ethnic, I'm white. How can I be a traitor to something I'm not apart of?
Besides, I believe National Socialism should be the global standard, regardless of race. E.G; a predominately black country could adopt National Socialism, and encourage an increase in birth rates of desirable black traits, and enforce a moulded version of the 25 NS tenets, and base it around their race.
In National Socialism, ideally "Chadolf" takes 1 virgin wife, no sexual promiscuity for men either.
Traditionalism is not palingenesis.
How am I more redpilled than blackpilled? Looks=everything. But traditionalism can change that, and make it how it used to be.
Was there hypergamy in 1940s Germany? No.
Hypergamy in 2018? To the point even chadlites have to date at least 3 points lower.
It's fucking pointless to debate with you, you can't praise Lebensborn then claim that in your ideal world, Chadolf only impregnates one woman.
A+ Effort Post. I mean there are some similarities with Incels and Radical Feminists. Both hate party culture and high expectations of their respective genders. In an ideal world, we could ally. I don't think that would ever happen though. Too unrealistic.
They would never want to associate with us, but we could astroturf them into fighting things that they unknowingly agree about with us. This would focus their attention away from Bentham and towards Brad, Chad, Stacey and Becky.
 

Similar threads

highschoolcel
Replies
102
Views
4K
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
L
Replies
53
Views
3K
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
Pajeetsingh
Replies
2
Views
328
Lonelyus
Lonelyus

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top