Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Inceldom is the result of societal configurations, and they would still bring you suffering even if you "ascend"

subhuman

subhuman

Fuck it, we ball
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 9, 2022
Posts
11,520
Inceldom as a dichotomy between sex havers and virgins doesn't fully describe the rigid hierarchical nature of sexuality in the modern era. It has been pointed out that the term "ascend" is foid worship as it seems to imply you will reach a higher state of being once you have sex. It also kind of promotes self improvement cuckery because it provides the possibility of attainment of this higher plane of existence. However, if this is true then why do so many sex havers want to get in here? Why do so many former incels who "ascend" want to come back?

This is a diseased world, and inceldom isn't the main problem but rather a symptom of the disease. Think about it like this. As an incel you are literally defining yourself based on women. It's not an individual phenomon with linear causality but more of a web of relationships to all the different whores and chads in the sexual market. Even if you somehow manage to ascend with a drunk girl or betabux some used up whore, the hostile sexual climate that made you an incel is still going to exist, mostly unchanged since you are just one small person out of billions and thus exert an insignificant amount of influence over the system. You will still suffer from it's effects, except you aren't able to control these:
  • Devaluation of virginity and chastity: good look getting a virgin foid jfl. And she will never be able to love you if she had her most special sexual moment taken by another man. Too much sexual experiences in her past causes a splintering of desire, meaning she is unable to commit. You will always be compared to her previous partners.
  • Abolition of traditional gender roles: who is really going to be wearing the pants in your relationship? Men of times past understood that women are hypersocial creatures and conform to the values of the group. Therefore it was the utmost importance to keep them relegated to the private sphere to limit the influences on them. Now they are allowed and encouraged to whore out on social media, have jobs, pursue an education, go outside... they are whoring out their impressionable minds for everyone to get a part of.
  • Individualism: your partner used to be understood as your "soul mate" who "completed you". Now they are more of just a "friend who you have sex with". They are fundamentally self interested and don't care about pleasing you, only themselves.
  • Age of consent: the pool of available foids is limited to old hags and blown out whores. you won't get to experience the purity and intensity of the love of a fiery young girl, before the attractile drives start to wane and before she is fully corrupted by the degenerative influences of societal institutions
  • Transience: foids are encouraged to date around to get experience so they know what they like. Since they don't care about having a history of multiple partners, who is to say she won't eventually break up with you too? Also, if you are ugly you will still experience lookism and she will monkey branch to someone more attractive.
  • Agepill: you spent your best years as an incel and now you are old and your libido has waned and you don't get to enjoy foids. No refunds for the time you lost, I'm afraid
Overall, it would be a mistake to think ascending means you got the "good ending". No, by being born ugly you got the "bad ending". This has been confirmed by incels who ascend and report miserable conditions, and then they get cucked or she leaves and they are back to being incels forever. The system of sexual capitalism in today's world is a polarizing system with absolute winners and absolute losers. The distinction between incels and nearcels or normies is like the distinction between a NEET and a wageslave working a minimum wage job. If everyone kept encouraging the NEET to find employment, so he went and got some trash minimum wage job, is he really better off? Attractive people and women are like the aristocracy of our world, and low value men are the peasants. No matter what you do, you won't get to live that privileged lifestyle of the aristocracy because you don't have noble birth.

This is why I don't even try to ascend anymore. Fuck this gay Earth. I hate these modern foids. I'm not attractive enough to live a good life, and in the modern era life is hell for low value young men no matter what you do. The only thing this stupid era is good for is smoking weed, watching anime, playing vidya, and beating off to internet porn.
 
Last edited:
WB dude. Sticking your penis in a hole doesen't change you life. Sharing your life with a loving and caring partner does.
 
WB dude. Sticking your penis in a hole doesen't change you life. Sharing your life with a loving and caring partner does.
Love doesn't exist in this hostile climate of loose morals in our modern era. The era has chosen casual sex. So if you are a chad or foid you win, and if you're a low value young man you lose.
 
Love doesn't exist in this hostile climate of loose morals in our modern era. The era has chosen casual sex. So if you are a chad or foid you win, and if you're a low value young man you lose.
true, its rarer than it has ever been for the average male in 2023. Ascending in it's most basic form is NOT the salvation.
 
WB dude. Sticking your penis in a hole doesen't change you life. Sharing your life with a loving and caring partner does.
As if there are any females like the bolded text in my country and age bracket
 
Inceldom as a dichotomy between sex havers and virgins doesn't fully describe the rigid hierarchical nature of sexuality in the modern era. It has been pointed out that the term "ascend" is foid worship as it seems to imply you will reach a higher state of being once you have sex. It also kind of promotes self improvement cuckery because it provides the possibility of attainment of this higher plane of existence. However, if this is true then why do so many sex havers want to get in here? Why do so many former incels who "ascend" want to come back?

This is a diseased world, and inceldom isn't the main problem but rather a symptom of the disease. Think about it like this. As an incel you are literally defining yourself based on women. It's not an individual phenomon with linear causality but more of a web of relationships to all the different whores and chads in the sexual market. Even if you somehow manage to ascend with a drunk girl or betabux some used up whore, the hostile sexual climate that made you an incel is still going to exist, mostly unchanged since you are just one small person out of billions and thus exert an insignificant amount of influence over the system. You will still suffer from it's effects, except you aren't able to control these:
  • Devaluation of virginity and chastity: good look getting a virgin foid jfl. And she will never be able to love you if she had her most special sexual moment taken by another man. Too much sexual experiences in her past causes a splintering of desire, meaning she is unable to commit. You will always be compared to her previous partners.
  • Abolition of traditional gender roles: who is really going to be wearing the pants in your relationship? Men of times past understood that women are hypersocial creatures and conform to the values of the group. Therefore it was the utmost importance to keep them relegated to the private sphere to limit the influences on them. Now they are allowed and encouraged to whore out on social media, have jobs, pursue an education, go outside... they are whoring out their impressionable minds for everyone to get a part of.
  • Individualism: your partner used to be understood as your "soul mate" who "completed you". Now they are more of just a "friend who you have sex with". They are fundamentally self interested and don't care about pleasing you, only themselves.
  • Age of consent: the pool of available foids is limited to old hags and blown out whores. you won't get to experience the purity and intensity of the love of a fiery young girl, before the attractile drives start to wane and before she is fully corrupted by the degenerative influences of societal institutions
  • Transience: foids are encouraged to date around to get experience so they know what they like. Since they don't care about having a history of multiple partners, who is to say she won't eventually break up with you too? Also, if you are ugly you will still experience lookism and she will monkey branch to someone more attractive.
  • Agepill: you spent your best years as an incel and now you are old and your libido has waned and you don't get to enjoy foids. No refunds for the time you lost, I'm afraid
Overall, it would be a mistake to think ascending means you got the "good ending". No, by being born ugly you got the "bad ending". This has been confirmed by incels who ascend and report miserable conditions, and then they get cucked or she leaves and they are back to being incels forever. The system of sexual capitalism in today's world is a polarizing system with absolute winners and absolute losers. The distinction between incels and nearcels or normies is like the distinction between a NEET and a wageslave working a minimum wage job. If everyone kept encouraging the NEET to find employment, so he went and got some trash minimum wage job, is he really better off? Attractive people and women are like the aristocracy of our world, and low value men are the peasants. No matter what you do, you won't get to live that privileged lifestyle of the aristocracy because you don't have noble birth.

This is why I don't even try to ascend anymore. Fuck this gay Earth. I hate these modern foids. I'm not attractive enough to live a good life, and in the modern era life is hell for low value young men no matter what you do. The only thing this stupid era is good for is smoking weed, watching anime, playing vidya, and beating off to internet porn.
We will ascend by founding Inceldia and enforcing monogamy
 
High IQ post!

There is no end game or good ending for us incels. The only thing we can do is moneymaxx and afford better copes.
 
The system of sexual capitalism in today's world is a polarizing system with absolute winners and absolute losers. The distinction between incels and nearcels or normies is like the distinction between a NEET and a wageslave working a minimum wage job. If everyone kept encouraging the NEET to find employment, so he went and got some trash minimum wage job, is he really better off? Attractive people and women are like the aristocracy of our world, and low value men are the peasants. No matter what you do, you won't get to live that privileged lifestyle of the aristocracy because you don't have noble birth.
Good analogy OP. It really does seem to be this way for most people. Either you have abundance, or you have mediocre / little, or you have none. Most people remain in the same class situation for their entire life. So if you never really had much in the past, chances are you probably never will for the rest of your life

Nothing ever really changes concerning the patterns of human sexual relations. At best, it only becomes more extreme as fewer males slay more pussy, while more males slay less pussy. The people who frequently slay have always been this way since they realized fertility as teens. The people who rarely or never slay are likely to be this way for the rest of their life

To a certain degree, the game is rigged. The symptoms caused by social exclusion and disdain are persistent. Normies are robots; they aren't really different from each other in practice. With time it becomes easier to predict how new people will behave towards you based on previous experience. Even when you touch pussy, you're still prone to experience things that correlate with low-value status, due to its relation with wider systems of society and human culture
 
Last edited:
Excellent post. Ascension is such a misnomer, since for most it means getting a lucky lay once that doesn't really change one's life at all, or at most getting a girlfriend and constantly needing to keep up a good impression and stress about being cheated on or getting dumped. How many of those who "ascended" from inceldom ended up in a loving marriage? Scarcely any I bet.

Being a virgin is only one minor aspect of being incel. The more defining aspect is how one is treated by others throughout life. Especially by women, but also by other men. Since it's obvious now that most incels also have few to no friends and have dealt with loneliness for most of their life. It is such an abnormal and unhealthy thing to be so alone. No doubt it will drive many of us to an early grave.

Only in a sick and dying society can so many people end up like this. In the past even the lowest of men had relationships - a community, friends, typically a wife and kids as well. Being a man all alone is truly the lowest form of life.
 
The only thing we can do is moneymaxx and afford better copes.
This is not a good cope to me. Money beyond the minimum for a comfortable living doesn't really do much. Besides incels tend to earn much less due to the failo effect applied to career, and being too depressed to work hard. Unsurprisingly there are many studies showing a strong correlation between height, facial attractiveness and income.
 
This is not a good cope to me. Money beyond the minimum for a comfortable living doesn't really do much. Besides incels tend to earn much less due to the failo effect applied to career, and being too depressed to work hard. Unsurprisingly there are many studies showing a strong correlation between height, facial attractiveness and income.
There is always exceptions, the place where i work there are a couple of incels ( including me ) that just wageslavemaxx and moneymaxx. I am in my 20s but these guys are in their 30s. I personally don't know if i can cope till then or i will rope
 
lonely dumb and dumber GIF
 
Inceldom as a dichotomy between sex havers and virgins doesn't fully describe the rigid hierarchical nature of sexuality in the modern era. It has been pointed out that the term "ascend" is foid worship as it seems to imply you will reach a higher state of being once you have sex. It also kind of promotes self improvement cuckery because it provides the possibility of attainment of this higher plane of existence. However, if this is true then why do so many sex havers want to get in here? Why do so many former incels who "ascend" want to come back?

This is a diseased world, and inceldom isn't the main problem but rather a symptom of the disease. Think about it like this. As an incel you are literally defining yourself based on women. It's not an individual phenomon with linear causality but more of a web of relationships to all the different whores and chads in the sexual market. Even if you somehow manage to ascend with a drunk girl or betabux some used up whore, the hostile sexual climate that made you an incel is still going to exist, mostly unchanged since you are just one small person out of billions and thus exert an insignificant amount of influence over the system. You will still suffer from it's effects, except you aren't able to control these:
  • Devaluation of virginity and chastity: good look getting a virgin foid jfl. And she will never be able to love you if she had her most special sexual moment taken by another man. Too much sexual experiences in her past causes a splintering of desire, meaning she is unable to commit. You will always be compared to her previous partners.
  • Abolition of traditional gender roles: who is really going to be wearing the pants in your relationship? Men of times past understood that women are hypersocial creatures and conform to the values of the group. Therefore it was the utmost importance to keep them relegated to the private sphere to limit the influences on them. Now they are allowed and encouraged to whore out on social media, have jobs, pursue an education, go outside... they are whoring out their impressionable minds for everyone to get a part of.
  • Individualism: your partner used to be understood as your "soul mate" who "completed you". Now they are more of just a "friend who you have sex with". They are fundamentally self interested and don't care about pleasing you, only themselves.
  • Age of consent: the pool of available foids is limited to old hags and blown out whores. you won't get to experience the purity and intensity of the love of a fiery young girl, before the attractile drives start to wane and before she is fully corrupted by the degenerative influences of societal institutions
  • Transience: foids are encouraged to date around to get experience so they know what they like. Since they don't care about having a history of multiple partners, who is to say she won't eventually break up with you too? Also, if you are ugly you will still experience lookism and she will monkey branch to someone more attractive.
  • Agepill: you spent your best years as an incel and now you are old and your libido has waned and you don't get to enjoy foids. No refunds for the time you lost, I'm afraid
Overall, it would be a mistake to think ascending means you got the "good ending". No, by being born ugly you got the "bad ending". This has been confirmed by incels who ascend and report miserable conditions, and then they get cucked or she leaves and they are back to being incels forever. The system of sexual capitalism in today's world is a polarizing system with absolute winners and absolute losers. The distinction between incels and nearcels or normies is like the distinction between a NEET and a wageslave working a minimum wage job. If everyone kept encouraging the NEET to find employment, so he went and got some trash minimum wage job, is he really better off? Attractive people and women are like the aristocracy of our world, and low value men are the peasants. No matter what you do, you won't get to live that privileged lifestyle of the aristocracy because you don't have noble birth.

This is why I don't even try to ascend anymore. Fuck this gay Earth. I hate these modern foids. I'm not attractive enough to live a good life, and in the modern era life is hell for low value young men no matter what you do. The only thing this stupid era is good for is smoking weed, watching anime, playing vidya, and beating off to internet porn.
Very high IQ quality post OP.

We should strife for a simpler life. Stop giving a fuck. And live a life like Diogenes intended.
 
Very high IQ quality post OP.

We should strife for a simpler life. Stop giving a fuck. And live a life like Diogenes intended.
Hard to live like a Diogenes if you live in places where winters are long.
 
Attractive people and women are like the aristocracy of our world, and low value men are the peasants. No matter what you do, you won't get to live that privileged lifestyle of the aristocracy because you don't have noble birth.
You have an insightful IQ . Its a Hierarchy / Caste System . Either your Born the Lion that kills and Eats the Rat , or the Rat that Suffers just because .

LIFE IS LUCK
 
High IQ essay and great post.

But there's something you overlooked or missed.

As an incel you are literally defining yourself based on women. It's not an individual phenomon with linear causality but more of a web of relationships to all the different whores and chads in the sexual market.
Inceldom is a natural phenomenon that occurs in the animal kingdom with any sexual species that competes for mates. In any game there will always be winners and losers. The mating game is no different. It's a sad fact of reality that some competitors in the game are quite literally born to lose, while others are made to lose through forces outside of nature (this is emergent and secondary). For this reason, inceldom cannot be defined in any other way, except through nature.

Amongst humans there exists a distribution of sexual access and availability that is based on the sexual value of each individual human in each sex (so two distributions). This value is based on genetics first and foremost, but is also based on other markers of success and failure, depending on each sex. For men, the non-genetic success markers are status in the male hierarchy and access to resources - the former implying the latter (plus dominance), but the latter not necessarily being contingent on the former. For women, these non-genetic markers are chastity, age and submissiveness, with chastity being the winner by a very wide margin, followed by age in close second.

A low status male with limited or no access to resources is - to literally no one's surprise - on the left tail end of the male distribution. A unchaste and boorish female is also on the left tail end of the female distribution of sexual value.

The problem arises when you have cultural and societal forces that grossly skew these natural distributions of sexual value. The result is, well, something like the tinder pig girl experiment, and the emergence of things like the "juggernaut law." The gynocentric status quo has accentuated and amplified the natural inequalities that exist. Our current societal and cultural climate - in the West primarily - has allowed for this unnatural skewness of sexual value. In parts of the world that are not infected by Western feminism, wokeism, and every other destructive ideology, this skewness doesn't exist (at least to nowhere near the same degree, since Western influence is global and affects every country to varying degrees), and everyone's sexual value corresponds to their true worth.

We are gradually witnessing a slow regression to the mean with respect to the sexual value of females in the West, as less men are simping for blown out, post wall roasties and successful bachelors living the bachelor lifestyle, refusing to settle for low value females. But there is still a great degree of progress that remains to be had in restoring the natural distribution of sexual value.
 
Last edited:
Love doesn't exist in this hostile climate of loose morals in our modern era. The era has chosen casual sex. So if you are a chad or foid you win, and if you're a low value young man you lose.
Love never existed in any era. Dating apps are just bringing out the brutal truth.
 
you spent your best years as an incel and now you are old and your libido has waned and you don't get to enjoy foids. No refunds for the time you lost, I'm afraid
Brutal

Great post
 
based of you to steal my ""ascend"" but then you ignore me right after






it's over
 
All the reasons you explained were because of jew influence on the west. Every single one
 
This is why we need GetFucked
 
This is why I don't even try to ascend anymore. Fuck this gay Earth. I hate these modern foids. I'm not attractive enough to live a good life, and in the modern era life is hell for low value young men no matter what you do. The only thing this stupid era is good for is smoking weed, watching anime, playing vidya, and beating off to internet porn.
Same. I think I will just carry on gymcelling and escortmaxxing until my 40s and then kill myself. Nothing else seems worthwhile. Very good post btw
 
Real long term solutions are
a) large scale eugenics. Soon / already doable directly through things like embryo selection and gen editing. No one should have to be born with anything below 9/10 in looks, athletics, health, size, dick size, IQ, weight etc. Studies indicate that beauty does not strongly relativise so 9/10 does not become the new 5/10 but stays more at an 8/10 level. If everyone looks great not only does it increase your chance because you look better but it also means that you can try to choose the for girls you go for by w/e metric you want and aren't driven by natural instinct to go for the most beautiful but also most pampered and selfabsorbed whores on the planet. If everyone is attractive you can just select for personality and compability without ending up with a girl you like but don't find particularly attractive.

-> Problem: The generation that would have had to do this for us to live in such a utopia would have not seen any of the benefits themselfs. Used to be that eugenics to lift the lower classes up was a core leftist idea but that was swapped for social engeneering and evolution denial after WW2. Genetic inequality is the real underlying one and the modern left is not all that interested in addressing it.

b) personalised Sexbots. Probably coming during our lifetime, though also tied with the end of our species through ASI. So get one quickly once they are available.
 
I agree wholeheartedly.
 
Love doesn't exist in this hostile climate of loose morals in our modern era. The era has chosen casual sex. So if you are a chad or foid you win, and if you're a low value young man you lose.
Cope of the highest order. Love exist if you look like Chris Hemsworth or Jason Momoa but... But if yu don't look like them of course love doesn't exist.

Dude there are literally women who suicide becouse of an handsome man rejected them.

Stop the redpill bullshit that love doesn't exist. Love exist but for 8/10+ men, everything below are betabuxxing.
 
Last edited:
Inceldom as a dichotomy between sex havers and virgins doesn't fully describe the rigid hierarchical nature of sexuality in the modern era. It has been pointed out that the term "ascend" is foid worship as it seems to imply you will reach a higher state of being once you have sex. It also kind of promotes self improvement cuckery because it provides the possibility of attainment of this higher plane of existence. However, if this is true then why do so many sex havers want to get in here? Why do so many former incels who "ascend" want to come back?

This is a diseased world, and inceldom isn't the main problem but rather a symptom of the disease. Think about it like this. As an incel you are literally defining yourself based on women. It's not an individual phenomon with linear causality but more of a web of relationships to all the different whores and chads in the sexual market. Even if you somehow manage to ascend with a drunk girl or betabux some used up whore, the hostile sexual climate that made you an incel is still going to exist, mostly unchanged since you are just one small person out of billions and thus exert an insignificant amount of influence over the system. You will still suffer from it's effects, except you aren't able to control these:
  • Devaluation of virginity and chastity: good look getting a virgin foid jfl. And she will never be able to love you if she had her most special sexual moment taken by another man. Too much sexual experiences in her past causes a splintering of desire, meaning she is unable to commit. You will always be compared to her previous partners.
  • Abolition of traditional gender roles: who is really going to be wearing the pants in your relationship? Men of times past understood that women are hypersocial creatures and conform to the values of the group. Therefore it was the utmost importance to keep them relegated to the private sphere to limit the influences on them. Now they are allowed and encouraged to whore out on social media, have jobs, pursue an education, go outside... they are whoring out their impressionable minds for everyone to get a part of.
  • Individualism: your partner used to be understood as your "soul mate" who "completed you". Now they are more of just a "friend who you have sex with". They are fundamentally self interested and don't care about pleasing you, only themselves.
  • Age of consent: the pool of available foids is limited to old hags and blown out whores. you won't get to experience the purity and intensity of the love of a fiery young girl, before the attractile drives start to wane and before she is fully corrupted by the degenerative influences of societal institutions
  • Transience: foids are encouraged to date around to get experience so they know what they like. Since they don't care about having a history of multiple partners, who is to say she won't eventually break up with you too? Also, if you are ugly you will still experience lookism and she will monkey branch to someone more attractive.
  • Agepill: you spent your best years as an incel and now you are old and your libido has waned and you don't get to enjoy foids. No refunds for the time you lost, I'm afraid
Overall, it would be a mistake to think ascending means you got the "good ending". No, by being born ugly you got the "bad ending". This has been confirmed by incels who ascend and report miserable conditions, and then they get cucked or she leaves and they are back to being incels forever. The system of sexual capitalism in today's world is a polarizing system with absolute winners and absolute losers. The distinction between incels and nearcels or normies is like the distinction between a NEET and a wageslave working a minimum wage job. If everyone kept encouraging the NEET to find employment, so he went and got some trash minimum wage job, is he really better off? Attractive people and women are like the aristocracy of our world, and low value men are the peasants. No matter what you do, you won't get to live that privileged lifestyle of the aristocracy because you don't have noble birth.

This is why I don't even try to ascend anymore. Fuck this gay Earth. I hate these modern foids. I'm not attractive enough to live a good life, and in the modern era life is hell for low value young men no matter what you do. The only thing this stupid era is good for is smoking weed, watching anime, playing vidya, and beating off to internet porn.
Probably the highest IQ thread that has been posted in the last few months.

The game was over once you were born ugly. There's no wining in the sexual/dating market.

Better to cope with the things you like.
 
A unchaste and boorish female is also on the left tail end of the female distribution of sexual value.
Is there any book that explains this more in detail? That is going to be a good answer to the toasties who say virginity does not add to the value of women.

The funny thing is that since the 80's jewwood has been trying its best to show female virgins as losers. In the movies Clueless, mean girls, and so many other lame ass movies.

I guess it has been a long term plan for oyveypeople to profit from the increase of sluts.
 
Is there any book that explains this more in detail? That is going to be a good answer to the toasties who say virginity does not add to the value of women.
Not that I'm aware of, because it's my own expansion of the idea of SMV.

For men, this distribution is generally going to be left skewed, which means that most of the SMV of males is going to be concentrated around older men who have more money and status. For women, the distribution would closely resemble the graph of y=e^(-x), where the most SMV is concentrated on the left side. For both sexes, the x-axis is age and the y-axis is sexual value. Attractiveness (conventional and objective, or otherwise) is implicit in both distributions.

The funny thing is that since the 80's jewwood has been trying its best to show female virgins as losers. In the movies Clueless, mean girls, and so many other lame ass movies.
Virgin females goes against the feminist narrative of the strong, independent, and sexually liberated female. Female virginity is this seen as a relic of the old world patriarchy that must necessarily be abolished for the good of women in progressive society.

This brainwashing has brought us to peak clown world levels with respect to the absolute state of male-female relations and marriage in the West.

I guess it has been a long term plan for oyveypeople to profit from the increase of sluts.
Profits are a nice side effect, but the intended purpose is more insidious than mere profits, which is surface level, superficial and pedestrian as far as global control and influence is concerned.
 
Cope of the highest order. Love exist if you look like Chris Hemsworth or Jason Momoa but... But if yu don't look like them of course love doesn't exist.

Dude there are literally women who suicide becouse of an handsome man rejected them.

Stop the redpill bullshit that love doesn't exist. Love exist but for 8/10+ men, everything below are betabuxxing.
Too many users here believe this retarded nihilistic cope that love doesn't exist. It's just another form of nihilism which is just an edgy coping mechanism. "Others are born into wealth and enjoy their lives forever while I'm a poorcel? Doesn't matter because we all die. "
Meaning exists. Just not for everyone.
 
Too many users here believe this retarded nihilistic cope that love doesn't exist. It's just another form of nihilism which is just an edgy coping mechanism. "Others are born into wealth and enjoy their lives forever while I'm a poorcel? Doesn't matter because we all die. "
Meaning exists. Just not for everyone.
Love exists for good looking people only. Even in stories, fairy tales, movies and books love happens only between good looking people ( of course I didn't read all the stories but I mean trends ).
 
Stop the redpill bullshit that love doesn't exist
You misconstrue what I said. I didn't argue love doesn't exist. I said love doesn't exist within the confines of the dominant morality of the era. And you just proved my point.

There's a difference between love and infatuation. Love is present in a couple in their 60's that have been happily married for over 45 years, long after their looks have faded. Infatuation is foids killing themselves because a handsome guy rejected them.

True love cannot be dependent on looks, because it reduces all aspects of that person to just a commodified image that doesn't fully encapsulate their humanity. This is probably why the divorce rate is so high. People like you think love = looks, as if that wasn't just a simple affirmation of biologically driven instincts, and then when they get older or the initial infatuation wanes, they all get divorces.
Others are born into wealth and enjoy their lives forever while I'm a poorcel? Doesn't matter because we all die.
This is somewhat true actually. Only a fool would try to hold onto something inherently fleeting like life. Furthermore, it's a barrier that prevents people from fully embracing the reality of existence, and therefore life denying. In order to live authentically, it's necessary to embrace life's fleeting nature.
Meaning exists. Just not for everyone
I disagree. Objective meaning does not exist, because it would have to come from an external source, and there's not objective or universal perspective from which we can observe the world. Instead of looking for an inherent meaning, people should create their own meanings that are in line with their own unique values.
 
This is somewhat true actually. Only a fool would try to hold onto something inherently fleeting like life. Furthermore, it's a barrier that prevents people from fully embracing the reality of existence, and therefore life denying. In order to live authentically, it's necessary to embrace life's fleeting nature.
Not everyone dies. Aristotle is more alive than all of us combined. Rich and famous people never die as they will always be subjects of dicussion and sources of knowledge for generations to come. True death only happens to the bottom 90% of people.
I disagree. Objective meaning does not exist, because it would have to come from an external source, and there's not objective or universal perspective from which we can observe the world. Instead of looking for an inherent meaning, people should create their own meanings that are in line with their own unique values.
You cannot "create" your own meaning. The only way this can happen is to fool yourself into thinking that this is the real meaning of your life, when it's not. That's why nihilists don't commit suicide. The logical action after becoming a true nihilist is suicide as that would be the only action having any "meaning". People "create" meanings all the time in order to fool their brains into thinking that they're inherent meanings. People who truly believe that inherent meaning doesn't exist, are not alive anymore.
 
Love exists for good looking people only. Even in stories, fairy tales, movies and books love happens only between good looking people ( of course I didn't read all the stories but I mean trends ).
Exactly. Love is real thing, but it doesn't exist for average looking and below average looking men
 
Not everyone dies.
All that walk the earth have died.
Aristotle is more alive than all of us combined. Rich and famous people never die as they will always be subjects of dicussion and sources of knowledge for generations to come. True death only happens to the bottom 90% of people
Different context obviously.
You cannot "create" your own meaning
Any kind of morality is created by the observer, since they can only perceive of reality through their own subjective worldview. It’s just a question of whether someone is strong enough to create their own values or are lazy and accept values other people hand to them.
The only way this can happen is to fool yourself into thinking that this is the real meaning of your life, when it's not. That's why nihilists don't commit suicide. The logical action after becoming a true nihilist is suicide as that would be the only action having any "meaning". People "create" meanings all the time in order to fool their brains into thinking that they're inherent meanings. People who truly believe that inherent meaning doesn't exist, are not alive anymore
You can believe that there is no inherent meaning to life, but create your own meaning based on your own subjective worldview. Because there’s not any other way to view the world than your own. It doesn’t have to have inherent meaning, as the only external justification it needs is your own.
 
I had no idea. Interesting.

Oh.

Re: hi, argentina is white
Unintelligent_Anon
Png

Join Date: 2016-02-24
Post Count: 361
#190223047Wednesday, June 01, 2016 6:23 AM CDT
Nonsense. Let us recall that the Spic territories are a cesspool of Caucasoid-Amerindian hybridization. Coupled with the Polynesian DNA infusions, Argentine individuals are genetically impure(In addition to being intellectually-inferior to Caucasian individuals), and thus not "true" Caucasian individuals. The advantages of a mere sliver of Caucasoid DNA are quickly offset by the defective traits introduced via primitive tribal parasites. Do not feign supposed "adequacy"; it is nonexistent.
 
Oh.

Re: hi, argentina is white
Unintelligent_Anon
Png

Join Date: 2016-02-24
Post Count: 361
#190223047Wednesday, June 01, 2016 6:23 AM CDT
Nonsense. Let us recall that the Spic territories are a cesspool of Caucasoid-Amerindian hybridization. Coupled with the Polynesian DNA infusions, Argentine individuals are genetically impure(In addition to being intellectually-inferior to Caucasian individuals), and thus not "true" Caucasian individuals. The advantages of a mere sliver of Caucasoid DNA are quickly offset by the defective traits introduced via primitive tribal parasites. Do not feign supposed "adequacy"; it is nonexistent.
I find it very impressive that Argentina and even Brazil managed to be generally white countries.
 
When i was 18 was in love with a 14 year old but i felt guilty so i did nothing :cryfeels:
 

Similar threads

FuckNoNutNovember
Replies
23
Views
325
MassEffectKoala
MassEffectKoala
A
Replies
24
Views
497
AntibioticsBro
A
iraniancel
Replies
8
Views
203
SuperKanga.Belgrade
SuperKanga.Belgrade
P
Replies
12
Views
135
Papers Please
P
Enigmaz
Replies
4
Views
263
Starfish Vs Koala
Starfish Vs Koala

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top